1 / 14

MCWG Update to WMS

MCWG Update to WMS. 2/9/2010. Agenda Items. Exposure / Collateral Status Update 1/26 MCWG/CWG Joint Meeting Potential NPRR to enable expiring CRRs to offset PTP bid credit exposure 1/31 MCWG/SEWG Joint Meeting

palma
Télécharger la présentation

MCWG Update to WMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MCWG Update to WMS 2/9/2010

  2. Agenda Items • Exposure / Collateral Status Update • 1/26 MCWG/CWG Joint Meeting • Potential NPRR to enable expiring CRRs to offset PTP bid credit exposure • 1/31 MCWG/SEWG Joint Meeting • Potential NPRR to be issued by ERCOT to expedite the invoicing and payment period for real time • Other • 2/16 Due Date: Comments on the standard Guarantee and Letter of Credit form are due • 2/3 Due Date: CWG is updating the roster and accepting membership applications • ERCOT discretion exercised to decrease TPE and E1 for Operating Days 2/2 – 2/9 • Next MCWG Meeting scheduled for 2/23

  3. Exposure / Collateral Update Nodal Total Potential Exposure reported by ERCOT as of 12/31/2010 remains less than Zonal Estimated Aggregate Liability (TPE = ↓22% since 10/31) Collateral Posted has increased since 10/31 Cash/LOCs ↑169% Guarantees ↑15% Net Impact – Secured MPs are posting 5.7xTPE vs. 2.3xEAL Unsecured Credit Limits have increased Dollar % ∆ = ↑213% Dollar / CPTY ∆ = ↑18MM from $13MM # MPs ↑+6 from 20 Note – Exposure reported does not include DAM Credit Exposure nor CRR Auction Credit Exposure as calculated in Section 4 and 7 of the Protocols Source: Finance And Audit Committee Meeting Materials, ERCOT Market Credit Status, Sept 2010 – January 2011

  4. 2011 MCWG Goals

  5. DAM Point-to-Point Credit Exposure Goal - Determine if DAM PTP Obligations can be offset with CRRs • Summary of Drafted NPRR language that would: • Clarify TPO credit exposure calculations for combined cycles • Clarify PTP credit exposure calculations as implemented pre go-live • Right size credit for DAM Energy Only Bid Curves to equate to the maximum exposure rather than total area of bid curve • Right size credit for DAM PTP bids where a qualified expiring CRR offsets potential cleared DAM exposure by reducing credit by PTP Bid Price • CRR Offset Qualification Summary • MP provides Counter-Party ID, the CRRAH ID, and the CRR ID with the PTP Obligation bid • PTP Bid submitted before 0X00 of the Day-Ahead • Same Source/Sink Pair, term, ∑ Q CRR ≥ ∑ Q PTP • Next Step – Submit NPRR with Urgent Status

  6. Examine Forms of LOCs and Guarantees • F&A requested a review of the Guarantee Agreement to ensure that the standard form document adequately protects ERCOT’s and Market Participants’ interests • Provide Chad Sealy with any initial questions, comments or suggested modifications to the existing language on standard Letter of Credit Agreement or Standard Guarantee Agreement by Close of Business, Wednesday, February 16, 2011

  7. Reduce Real Time invoice timelines & Real Time collateral requirements Considerations discussed on 1/26 and 1/31: Issue one Invoice per sub-QSE per business day on Operating Day +10 for RT versus Operating Day +14 to +20 for RT • Credit factors: • Increase the frequency for which RT invoices impact OUT • Enable Market Participants to reduce posting requirements via issuing early PMTs • Reduce # of unbilled RT days completed and settled from 4 to 10 days • Reduce payment due date from 5 days to 3 days • Review # days referenced in ADTE while taking forward exposure into consideration • A multiple of 36x was discussed in comparison to the current multiple of 40x • Reduce # of unbilled statements referenced within AIL • Reduce Completed and Settled references due to expedited invoice cycle • Potentially reduce time gap between ADTE and DALE values • TBD - Reductions in unsecured risk limits to reduce default risk

  8. 2/2 -2/9 ERCOT Discretion DAM Revisions • E1 Revisions • For Operating Days 2/4 & 2/5 ERCOT revised Energy Only Bid credit requirements by decreasing Market Participant’s E1 values to 70% of calculated E1 values • Uth %ile (i.e. PTP RT OTM risk) • For Operating Days 2/5 - 2/8 ERCOT revised the uth %ile from the 90th %ile to the 80th %ile TPE Revisions • AIL Revision for Operating Days 2/2 – 2/9 • As of 2/2: 7 forward days discounted to 100% (0.667 x 150% =100%) • As of 2/3: 7 forward days discounted to 5% (0.05 x 150% =0.075%) • ADTE Revision on 2/18 • 2/2 will be removed from the ADTE calculation on 2/18 • DALE • Feb 4th DALE will be frozen till Feb 9th • After Feb 9th DALE calculations will exclude Operating Days Feb 3rd and Feb 4th

  9. Appendix • PTP and CRR Settlement Example • Reason for CRR Offset • Real Time Settlement Information • Bid Curve Exposure Example

  10. Forward Hedge pre DAM: Resource Position 10 MWh Load Position 10 MWh CRR Position (Bus-Zone) 10 MWh DAM Transaction and Exposure: PTP DAM Bid(w/ Uth%ile =$5) PTP Bid Details: Q= 10MWh , P= $50 , Bus-Zone DAM Credit Exposure =[Max[ 0, Pbid] + Uth%ile ] * Qbid= $50 + $5] * 10MWh = $550 Net Day Ahead Risk to ERCOT versus Collateral Requirement Ex: Posting Requirements related to a QSE representing load and generation Net Position 0 MWh Settlements & Invoices post DAM: (Zone SPP = $100; GenBus SPP = $50) @ Resource = $50 * 10MWh = $500 @ Zone = $100 * -10MWh = $-1000 @ CRR = [$100-$50] * 10MWh = $500 $550 Collateral vs. $0 DA Settlement • Note:(1) Expiring CRR Offsets PTP Bid • (2) DAM Credit Exposure over estimates potential for cleared risk Net Exposure $0.00

  11. Risk Aversion ExampleHB_South to LZ_South Data from the 48 Hour South PTP Disclosure Report Market Participants that are risk adverse to real time congestion risk, may bid aggressively for PTPs in DAM to ensure the continuation of a CRR hedge that expires in the DAM Data from the 48 Hour South Disclosure Report identifies that market participants were bidding up to $230 / MWh for a PTP in the DAM, even when the DAM Settlement Price averaged near $0 Real time risk avoided can be illustrated by the congestion observed between HB_South and LZ_South on operating days 1/12 and 1/13 Real Time Congestion Risk

  12. Nodal Invoicing – Current State

  13. Nodal Invoicing – Proposed

  14. DAM Bid Example & Clearing Price Max Price Exposure Example DAM Energy Only Bid Curve calculations overlook maximum risk 10 • 10MW 5x16 NZ @ $10 • 500MW 5x16 NZ @ $2 • 600MW 5x16 NZ @ $1 • PCleared = $1/MWh ; 1,110MW Awarded Max Exp = $1/MWh A $100 2 Bid Price ($/MW) B $1020 1 C $1110 10 510 1110 Quantity (MW) Max Exposure = $1110 Area Under Curve = $4510

More Related