1 / 9

Crossover Design in a Modified Latin Square Design

Crossover Design in a Modified Latin Square Design. Irrigation Water Usage and Corn Growth over 6 Seasons in 4 Quadrants for 4 Irrigation Schedules

parley
Télécharger la présentation

Crossover Design in a Modified Latin Square Design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Crossover Design in a Modified Latin Square Design Irrigation Water Usage and Corn Growth over 6 Seasons in 4 Quadrants for 4 Irrigation Schedules D.D. Steele, E.C. Stegman, and R.E. Knighton (2000). "Irrigation Management for Corn in the Northern Great Plains, USA," Irrigation Science, Vol19, pp.107-114.

  2. Experimental Summary • Goal: Compare the effects of 4 Irrigation Schedules in terms of Water Usage and Corn Growth over 6 Seasons on 4 quadrants. • Irrigation Schedules/Methods: • A=Tensiometer & Infra-red, B&C=H2O Balance, D=CERES • Seasons: Years 1=1900 to 6=1995 • Quadrants: 1=SW, 2=SE, 3=NE, 4=NW • Modified Latin Square (Rows=Years,Cols=Quads): • Year 1: All Quadrants receive schedule A • Years 2-5: Traditional Latin Square • Year 6: Repeat of Year 5

  3. Design Summary/Data • Modifications allow for each treatment to follow each treatment (including itself) at least once, and for independent estimates of direct and carryover effects of approximately equal precision. • Effects to be estimated/tested: • Year (6 levels, 5 degrees of freedom) • Quad (4 levels, 3 degrees of freedom) • Direct Scheduling Effect (4 levels, 3 df) • Carryover Scheduling Effect (4 levels, 3 )df

  4. Statistical Model/Formulation Note that the indices (i,j) refer to year and quad. Only one schedule appears in each year/quad (see previous slide), and only one schedule appears in the previous year/same quad. There are no carryover effects in year 1.

  5. Matrix Form – Y = Xb + e Y X b

  6. Parameter Estimates Units: Water: Irrigation Totals (mm) Corn: Harvest yield (100s kg/hectare) “Extreme” Effects:

  7. Analysis of Variance • Goal: Test for Direct and Carryover Effects for Irrigation Methods. • Problem (often, as opposed to traditional Latin Square): Treatment Factors are not orthogonal. • Solution: Use Type I (Sequential) Sums of Squares • SS(Year|m) • SS(Quad|Year,m) • SS(TrtDirect|Quad,Year,m) • SS(TrtCarryover|TrtDirect,Quad,Year,m) • SS(TrtDirect|TrtCarryover,Quad,Year,m) • Due to Modified Latin Square, Direct and Carryover: • SS(TrtDirect|Quad,Year,m) = SS(TrtDirect|TrtCarryover,Quad,Year,m)

  8. Computation of Sums of Squares

  9. Results for Irrigation Data There is no evidence of direct or carryover effects with respect to water usage. Both type of effects are significant with respect to corn yield Note that SS(Irr Direct) and SS(Irr Carryover) are the same whether or they have been adjusted for the other, due to the modified design. In a traditional latin square, they would not have been

More Related