1 / 24

Environmental River Enhancement Programme (EREP)

Environmental River Enhancement Programme (EREP). An approach to addressing WFD hydromorphology issues in arterially drained channels in Ireland James J. King, Inland Fisheries Ireland. RRC meeting – Best Practise River Restoration Design and Construction, Lyndhurst, England

parley
Télécharger la présentation

Environmental River Enhancement Programme (EREP)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Environmental River Enhancement Programme (EREP) An approach to addressing WFD hydromorphology issues in arterially drained channels in Ireland James J. King, Inland Fisheries Ireland RRC meeting – Best Practise River Restoration Design and Construction, Lyndhurst, England 13 – 14.7.2011

  2. OPW channels make up 20% of channels in Ireland 11,504 km of Channel (90% <3m base width 2000km of channel maintained annually (EREP 5%/annum)

  3. Environmental River Enhancement Programme (EREP) • Walkover / Planning surveys • Capital Works strand • Enhanced Maintenance strand • Auditing of crews for implementation of environmental guidance notes • Monitoring Programme at selected sites

  4. Capital Works ‘Design & build’ appropriate ‘structures’ Import materials Instal fencing Enhanced Mtnce Use machine on-site to achieve ‘added-value’ Habitat retention Modify the long- and cross-section where channel bed permits EREP: 100 km of river works annually

  5. Fundamental Question: • What am I trying to do here? OR • What am I catering for?

  6. Capital Works Pre-requisites include: • Water quality • Channel gradient • No conveyance issues

  7. Capital Works delivery • OPW and IFI agree site • IFI design and supervise • OPW arrange land access • OPW order in materials • OPW undertake the ‘construction’ work instream and any fencing • IFI undertake any pre- and post- monitoring

  8. Construct 2 alternating stone deflectors Introduce a gravel spawning shoal which will be one channel width in terms of length. Flow Excavate a thalweg associated with the deflectors and place a single layer of broken stone or cobble on the bed of the thalweg.The thalweg should be 1/3 channel base width. Page 4 of 7

  9. Excavated thalweg through bedrock with large exposed boulders. Centrally excavated pool. Lateral scour pool. Stone deflector Anglers walkway Lateral scour pool. Paired stone deflector Page 5 of 6

  10. Page 7 of 34 A specification for particle size in introduced gravel shoals (for salmon) is available on page 113 of Channels and Challenges. The smallest particles (4mm – 8mm) are the least important in the mix. New paired stone deflector with associated pool and gravel shoal (see page 9 for specification). Remove this structure and reuse stone material in new paired deflector. Excavate a thalweg along this line which is circa 1/3 basewidth with a max depth of 0.5m Construct a deflector which is 1/3 basewidth Please note that from here d/s to location on page 31 some rock breaking may be required at intervals to achieve the objectives outlined. Flow

  11. Construct a series of alternating deflectors d/s to the first road bridge. These should be spaced ,at intervals, to keep the flow moving through the thalweg. Vary their spacing to accommodate local changes in bed gradient. See the appendix for deflector design ( page x of ). Excavate a thalweg circa 1/3 channel base width which will be 0.7m. in depth at low flows. Punctuate the thalweg with one pool between each pair of deflectors as illustrated. Individual pools should be centrally placed, be ½ channel base width in width , 3.5m. in length and have a maximum depth of 1.3m.. Place one boulder in the centre of each pool. Place a gravel spawning shoal at the tail of each pool and recommence the excavation of the thalweg towards the tail of each gravel shoal to “lead” the flow into the next pool. Gravel shoals should extend from the face of the deflector to the opposite bank. Ensure a depth of 40cm. In gravel shoals – see appendix for gravel size mix. Repeat this sequence downstream to the first bridge.See plan drawing of this proposal on the next page ( page4 of x). Gravel shoal Pool Thalweg Flow Page 3 of 10

  12. Schematic Plan of the works outlined on Page 3 of x. Deflectors Pools Flow Thalweg Boulders Gravel Shoals These will need to be circa 300mm. beneath the height of the deflectors. Page 4 of 10

  13. Enhanced Maintenance • NO pre-requisites • Conveyance improvement essential • Implementation of 10-point environmental guidance notes, as relevant • Chance for value-added work in maintenance

  14. Enhanced Maintenance Managing conveyance

  15. Enhanced Maintenance Managing conveyance

  16. 10. New Excavations in the channel: • 10.1 Excavate bed to form deeper pool areas and shallow riffles • 10.2 Overdeepen the channel along one side and place spoil on opposite side – particularly on curves and bends • 10.3 Use existing spoil to form SIMPLE low-level structures undertakelarge-scale new diggings in an agreed plan and only if channel bed is of suitable material

  17. 7.7.2011: C6/7/1 Overdig the bed – narrower, deeper inset channel

  18. 7.7.2011: C6/7/1 bedrock – use spoil to form low berms – narrower, deeper inset channel

  19. 10.2 Overdig in low gradient channels – not a lost cause!!! Place spoil this side Standard Trapezoidal form Overdig this side

  20. Major issues for design and delivery of EREP • Engineering imprimatur on any plan developed (peace of mind for all)

  21. Major issues for design and delivery of EREP • Landowner permissions for any access and import of materials

  22. Major issues for design and delivery • Clear plan as to “who-does-what-and-when”

  23. Major issues for design and delivery • Channel bed – gradient – water quality as issues

  24. Ends

More Related