1 / 11

Changes from -07 to -08

Changes from -07 to -08.

penelope-herman
Télécharger la présentation

Changes from -07 to -08

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Changes from -07 to -08 • ISSUE 11 (and 23):Should clarifying text indicate that the Confirmed candidates, chosen by the standard process, as opposed to mid term appointments, be expected to serve at least 2 years.312a313,316> The term of a confirmed candidate selected according to the> mid-term vacancy rules may be less than 2 years, as stated> elsewhere in this document.>

  2. ISSUE 8:Is text making it explicit that the maximum assignable term is 3 years needed?315c319< may assign a term greater than 2 years in order to ensure the---> may assign a term of not more than 3 years in order to ensure the321,323c325,327< and those sitting) to which it may assign a term greater than 2< years to ensure that all such members will not be reviewed at the< same time.---> and those sitting) to which it may assign a term of not more than> 3 years to ensure that all such members will not be reviewed at> the same time.

  3. ISSUE 25:There is a mention here of a liaison from the ISOC board. But, there in section 4.3 there is a list of NOMCOM members that indicates how they are selected, and the ISOC liaison is not listed.621c621< volunteers, 2 liaisons, and an advisor.---> volunteers, 3 liaisons, and an advisor.> 644a645,647> The Internet Society Board of Trustees may appoint a liaison to> the nominating committee at its own discretion.755,758c758< 9. The Internet Society Board of Trustees may appoint a liaison to< the nominating committee.< < 10. An advisor is responsible for such duties as specified by the---> 9. An advisor is responsible for such duties as specified by the

  4. ISSUE 9:"all members" wording implies everyone must agree. What is the intent here? Is it "must be approved by a quorum of the committee according to its established voting mechanism"? Note: similar wording appears elsewhere.625,627c625,627< committee. The addition must be approved by all members of the< committee according to its established voting mechanism.< Advisors participate as individuals.---> committee. The addition must be approved by the committee> according to its established voting mechanism. Advisors> participate as individuals.632,634c632,634< approved by all members of the committee according to its< established voting mechanism. Liaisons participate as< representatives of their respective organizations.---> approved by the committee according to its established voting> mechanism. Liaisons participate as representatives of their> respective organizations.1031,1032c1031,1032< the committee. The rule must be approved by all members of the< committee according to its established voting mechanism.---> the committee. The rule must be approved by the committee> according to its established voting mechanism.

  5. ISSUE 7:The above implies to me that the NOMCOM is required to find a replacement for a resignation, but is not for a recall. Shouldn't the NOMCOM be allowed to also not replace resignations? I.e, I assume that the NOMCOM would have the option of filling or not filling any NOMCOM opening, regardless of how it occurs.1129,1134c1129,1134< If a voting volunteer member is recalled the committee may< choose to proceed with only 9 voting volunteers at its own< discretion. In all other cases the Chair must repeat the random< selection process including an announcement of the iteration< prior to the actual selection as stated elsewhere in this< document.---> If a voting volunteer member is recalled, regardless of the> circumstances, the committee may choose to proceed with only 9> voting volunteers at its own discretion. In all other cases the> Chair must repeat the random selection process including an> announcement of the iteration prior to the actual selection as> stated elsewhere in this document.

  6. ISSUE 5:Section 5, Point 12 suggests that the committee consult with the sitting members of the IAB and IESG. I think that consultation with WG chairs should be suggested.1224c1224,1225< Directors.---> Directors, and working group chairs, especially those in the> areas with open positions.

  7. ISSUE 4:The recall section makes no provision or even suggestion that the Recall Chair verify the putative signers.1477a1478,1482> The IETF Secretariat is responsible for confirming that each> signatory is qualified to be a voting member of a nominating> committee. A valid petition must be signed by at least 20> qualified signatories.>

  8. Editorial • ISSUE 6:1923,1924c1923,1925< 2. No person should serve on both the IESG and the IAB concurrently,< except the IETF Chair who serves on both bodies by definition.---> 2. No person should serve both on the IAB and as an Area Director,> except the IETF Chair whose roles as an IAB member and Area> Director of the General Area are set out elsewhere. • ISSUE 12:349c353< First, when there is only one official nominating committee the---> First, when there is only one official nominating committee, the

  9. ISSUE 13:538c542< As of the publication of this document the current mechanism is---> As of the publication of this document, the current mechanism is • ISSUE 18:587,588c587,588< three meetings) after the next nominating committee's term< begins.---> three meetings), i.e., the IETF meeting after the next> nominating committee's term begins.

  10. ISSUE 14:650c653< committee unless otherwise specified.---> committee unless otherwise specified in this document. • ISSUE 15:692c695< may appoint a temporary substitute.---> may appoint a temporary substitute for the Chair position. • EDITORIAL CHANGE NOT LISTED ANYWHERE:1610,1611c1610,1611< all times except that the only voting volunteers vote on a< candidate selection.---> all times except that only voting volunteers vote on a candidate> selection.

  11. ISSUE 16:733,738c733,741< or issues to the Chair of the nominating committee immediately.< If they can not resolve the issue between themselves liaisons< must report the issue to their respective bodies. If their< respective body agrees that there is an issue the liaison must< report it according to the dispute resolution process stated< elsewhere in this document.---> Liaisons from the IESG, IAB, and Internet Society Board of> Trustees (if one was appointed) are expected to review the> operation and executing process of the nominating committee and> to report any concerns or issues to the Chair of the nominating> committee immediately. If they can not resolve the issue> between themselves, liaisons must report the issue to their> respective bodies. If their respective body agrees that there> is an issue the liaison must report it according to the dispute> resolution process stated elsewhere in this document.769c769< can not resolve the issue between themselves the prior year's---> can not resolve the issue between themselves, the prior year's1153c1153< between themselves the prior year's Chair must report it---> between themselves, the prior year's Chair must report it

More Related