1 / 17

Expanding Clinical Services in Iowa Pharmacies: A Multi-Case Study

This study examines the changes made by Iowa pharmacies to expand their clinical services, using the SEIPS work system model. It identifies strategies for success and obstacles faced in value-based programs.

pereza
Télécharger la présentation

Expanding Clinical Services in Iowa Pharmacies: A Multi-Case Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Work System of Value-Based Programs in Pharmacy: A Multi-Case Study Joel Hoyman, Samantha Johnson, Matti Mason & Michael Parisi-Mercado Preceptor: Dr. Bill Doucette

  2. Background • Evolution of pharmacy in Iowa • Change in the role of the pharmacist • Iowa Pharmacy Association (IPA) New Practice Model • Community Pharmacy Enhanced Services Network (CPESN) Iowa • Focus on providing clinical services • Lower payments forcing pharmacies to seek other revenue streams • Purpose: discuss changes that pharmacies across the state of Iowa have made to expand their offering of clinical services • Utilize the System Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) work system model • Focus on 5 work system areas • Tools & technology, people, tasks, organization, environment

  3. Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) work system model

  4. Objectives • Determine how many pharmacies utilizing the New Practice Model or members of CPESN have addressed changes in their work system to be successful in this new value-based program. • i.e. : changes to provide new services, technology, staff organization • Identify strategies these pharmacies used that aided in their success, as well as what obstacles may have impeded their success in the new program. • i.e.: medication therapy management (MTM) , immunizations, Medication Synchronization (MedSync)

  5. Methods • Qualitative study • List of pharmacies • IPA New Practice Model Participants • CPESN Iowa Members • 106 pharmacies contacted • Letter via email • Recorded phone interview with willing pharmacy participants • Utilized an interview guide • Semi-structured interview focused on five work system areas of interest • Interviews transcribed, coded • Matched responses to work system area

  6. Case 1 Tools & Technology • Eye-Con Pill Counter • Dispensing software: ComputerRx • Documentation: ComputerRx • Looking at utilizing Prescribe Wellness as well Tasks • Medpacks • MedSync • Immunizations • MTMs • Adherence Packaging People • 1 clinical pharmacist, 1 staff pharmacist • New Practice Model pharmacy Chain Pharmacy 700-800 Rx/week Pharmacists: 2 Technicians: 3 Population: 60,000

  7. Case 1 Environment • Private counseling room • Also utilized for immunizations, long-acting injections • Transition of care program with local hospital • Good physician--pharmacist relationships Organization • Technician-run adherence packaging • Emails, quarterly reviews Chain Pharmacy 700-800 Rx/week Pharmacists: 2 Technicians: 3 Population: 60,000

  8. Case 2 Tools & Technology • Eye-Con Pill Counter • Refill App • Central Fill • Documentation: Patient Reporting Software Tasks • MedSync • ReadyRefill • Adherence Packaging • Immunizations • MTM People • One new experienced tech hired; mostly just trained current employees. • New Practice Model Pharmacy Chain Pharmacy 1500 Rx/week Pharmacists: 3 Technicians: 4 Population: 8,000

  9. Case 2 Environment • Private Counseling/Immunization Room • Great physician--pharmacist relationship • Local hospital main clinic will often call with drug questions, etc. Organization • Memos, bi-annual meetings • More counseling on refills than in the past • Face-to-face patient interaction/communication • Techs checking prescriptions frees pharmacists Chain Pharmacy 1500 Rx/week Pharmacists: 3 Technicians: 4 Population: 8,000

  10. Case 3 Tools & Technology: • ScriptPro robot • Electronic faxing • Omnifiller for MedSync program Tasks: • MedSync • Adherence packaging • Immunizations • Point of care testing • Shared duties between pharmacists • Technicians involved in inventory management, entering and filling prescriptions, answering phone People: • No new hires • No changes in staffing or scheduling Independent Pharmacy Prescriptions: 2,000 per week Pharmacists: 4 Technicians: 5 Population: approximately 24,000

  11. Case 3 Environment: • Room with table and chairs where they provide immunization • Consultation area Organization: • Not enough communication when informing of changes • Will implement monthly meetings Independent Pharmacy Prescriptions: 2,000 per week Pharmacists: 4 Technicians: 5 Population: approximately 24,000

  12. Case 4 Tools & Technology: • Parata Robot • Eye-Con Pill Counter • Phone system automatically calls patients when prescriptions are ready • Using QS1, not very MTM friendly Tasks: • MedSync • MTM’s • Free Vitamin Program for children People: • Recently hired a pharmacist • In charge of MTM’s • Technicians do the bulk of the MedSync Independent Pharmacy 1,400 Rx/wk Pharmacists: 3 Technicians: 8 Pop. 4,000

  13. Case 4 Environment: • Standard counseling area • New room for immunizations and private counseling • Prescribers call at any time of the day Organization: • Technicians are in charge of all portions of filling except checking • Doing much more calling patients than in the past Independent Pharmacy 1,400 Rx/wk Pharmacists: 3 Technicians: 8 Pop. 4,000

  14. Results 8 Pharmacies responded & completed an interview • 5 independent • 3 chain Initial Findings: • Multiple clinical services offered: MTMs, MedSync, Immunizations • Many are giving more responsibilities to technicians • Not many changes in staffing *still in progress*

  15. Strengths & Limitations Strengths: • Coded interviews in pairs • Use of a proven conceptual framework • Use of semi-structured interviews • Sample of pharmacies from the CPESN and IPA New Practice Model should be more progressive. Limitations: • Wasn’t face-to-face, on-site • Limited sample size • Didn’t do a checkback process • Different people did interviews

  16. Next Steps • Write a case report for each case • More thorough comparisons • Develop quantitative approach • Survey questions • Gain larger study population

  17. questions?

More Related