1 / 4

AEC’09 Session 1 Motivation, e-cloud Beam Observations & Simulations, Coating Requirements

AEC’09 Session 1 Motivation, e-cloud Beam Observations & Simulations, Coating Requirements. SPS ugrade plan, Elena Shaposhnikova Which SPS parts to be coated? Giovanni Rumolo J-PARC, Shigeki Kato SNS, Mike Plum Cesr -TA part 1, Mark Palmer Cesr -TA part 2, Jim Crittenden.

petula
Télécharger la présentation

AEC’09 Session 1 Motivation, e-cloud Beam Observations & Simulations, Coating Requirements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AEC’09 Session 1Motivation, e-cloud Beam Observations & Simulations, Coating Requirements SPS ugrade plan, Elena Shaposhnikova Which SPS parts to be coated? Giovanni Rumolo J-PARC, Shigeki Kato SNS, Mike Plum Cesr-TA part 1, Mark Palmer Cesr-TA part 2, Jim Crittenden

  2. discussion points • does TiN coating help? - not at all (SNS), a little (CESR-TA), a lot (PEP-II, KEKB) - J-PARC (no data yet), PSR – sometimes TiN helped - relative effect of scrubbing less strong for TiN - differences between e+ and e- at CESR-TA - benefit of TiN depends on bunch spacing & #bunches - SNS 3 years operation, no clear evidence for scrubbing in presence of controlled venting 2 or 3 times per year

  3. TE-wave measurements at cyclotron-resonance - handle with care! • how reliable are the predictions? • unexpected e-p instability at SNS, at 20% of design intensity with TiN coating, compared with predicted 130% w/o coating • SPS dump kicker with 50-ns bunch spacing? • FNAL MI e-cloud evolution during acceleration • SNS: effect of particles in gap? • SNS: problem with build up or with instability?

  4. SEY values after conditioning? • re-diffused component, “anti-dips” for TiN • mitigation by higher beam intensity • “magnetron effect” - CESR-TA experiment? • bremsstrahlung off beam protons

More Related