1 / 4

AIPLA LICENSING AND MANAGEMENT OF IP COMMITTEE

AIPLA LICENSING AND MANAGEMENT OF IP COMMITTEE. October 26, 2012. David Leichtman. Rates Technology v. Speakeasy et al: The Issues Left Open. Is A Court Entered Order And Stipulation Necessary Before The Parties Can Contract Around Lear ?.

peyton
Télécharger la présentation

AIPLA LICENSING AND MANAGEMENT OF IP COMMITTEE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AIPLA LICENSING AND MANAGEMENT OF IP COMMITTEE October 26, 2012 David Leichtman

  2. Rates Technology v. Speakeasy et al: The Issues Left Open Is A Court Entered Order And Stipulation Necessary Before The Parties Can Contract Around Lear?

  3. Rates Technology v. Speakeasy et al: The Issues Left Open Must There Have Been Discovery On Invalidity Before The Parties Can Contract Around Lear?

  4. Rates Technology v. Speakeasy et al: The Issues Left Open Would An Enhanced Royalty, In Lieu Of A “No Challenge” Clause Be An Acceptable Way To Contract Around Lear? If So, Under What Circumstances? Pre-Litigation Settlement? Post-Litigation Settlement? Consent Decree Required? Discovery on Invalidity Required?

More Related