1 / 11

Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement

Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement. Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. Busan – a new world of development. Diversity of actors. Diversity of forms of co-operation. Complementarity rather than competing with other resources for development

pia
Télécharger la présentation

Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation.

  2. Busan – a new world of development • Diversity of actors. • Diversity of forms of co-operation. • Complementarity rather than competing with other resources for development • Catalytic role of co-operation. • Unique value and nature of South-South co-operation.

  3. Who’s in? • 160 countries and territories • 45 international organizations • Developing countries • South-South co-operation providers • ‘Traditional’ donors • Private sector • Civil Society Organizations • Parliamentary organizations decentralized Entities, etc.

  4. 5 new indicators Country level data collection 10 Global indicators

  5. Overall data TOTAL ODA captured 2012/13 Submissions from DPG: AfDB, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, EU, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, UN, UK, USG and WB. Other providers: GAVI and the Global Fund. Reached out to: Abu Dhabi Fund, ABEDA, OPEC Fund, Saudi Fund, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, OPEC Fund for International Development and the BRICS. • Total ODA for Tanzania: USD 2,9 Bn. • Total for GoT:USD 2,2 Bn • Total MTEFs 2012/13:USD 2 Bn. • Total through other providers:USD 94 mil.

  6. Indicator 5:More Predictable Development Co-operation Increased ownership over development policies and reforms • More accurate recording of development co-operation funding in national systems • Better planning and allocation of resources within and across sectors • Better implementation of national development strategies over the medium term • Greater transparency and accountability

  7. Indicator 5a:Annual Predictability DP data submission Annualpredictability 2012/13: 81.7% 2005-2010:

  8. Indicator 5b:More Predictable Development Co-operation • Medium term predictability • 86% for 2013/14 • 64% for 2014/15 • 50% for 2015/16 GoT data submission

  9. Indicator 6:Aid on Budget GoT and DP data submission • Better ownership, alignment and accountability • Better knowledge of aid flows • Better alignment with priorities as outlined in the budget • More accurate and comprehensive budget reports • Greater transparency in reporting by providers • Parliaments have occasions to examine the aid modalities, activities and achievements Aid on budget 2012/13: 92.5% DP Average: 56%

  10. Indicator 9:Use of Country Systems DP data submission • 71.3% of ODA for GoT uses national systems. The percentage for the 4 sub-questions: • Use of national budget execution systems: 75% • Use of national financial reporting systems: 71% • Use of national audit systems: 81% • Use of national procurement procedures: 58%

  11. Timeframe • Early Oct: data cleaning and verification • Oct 17/10 at 11.00: Validation meeting ANSAF • Oct 31: Global deadline for submission

More Related