1 / 24

”Oljenæringens samfunnsansvar – et innlegg om holdninger, verdier og bedriftsfilosofi”

”Oljenæringens samfunnsansvar – et innlegg om holdninger, verdier og bedriftsfilosofi” Desemberkonferansen 2008 Gro Skaaren-Fystro, TI Norge gskaaren@online.no. Corruption Perception Index 2008. Hva skyldes fallet på årets indeks?. Økt bevissthet om korrupsjon i Norge

pooky
Télécharger la présentation

”Oljenæringens samfunnsansvar – et innlegg om holdninger, verdier og bedriftsfilosofi”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ”Oljenæringens samfunnsansvar – et innlegg om holdninger, verdier og bedriftsfilosofi” Desemberkonferansen 2008 Gro Skaaren-Fystro, TI Norge gskaaren@online.no

  2. Corruption Perception Index 2008

  3. Hva skyldes fallet på årets indeks? • Økt bevissthet om korrupsjon i Norge • Det blir ikke gjort nok verken i offentlig eller privat sektor for å bøte på problemet

  4. Examples of corruption in Norway • Vannverksaken • Oslo Kommune-saken • Drammen Kommune-saken • Gardermoen-saken • Mannesmann/Statoil-saken • UNICEF-saken • Røde Kors-saken • Statoil/Horton-saken • Veritas-saken • Ullevål-saken • Finance Credit • OVDS-saken • SINTEF-saken • Vinmonopolet • Legeerklæringer • Matvarekjedene • Forsvaret • Midtåsen-saken • Båtsertifikat-saken Listen er mye lenger…..

  5. Sectors most prone to bribery • Public works/construction • Arms and defence • Oil and gas • Real estate/property • Telecoms • Power generation/transmission • Mining Source: TI Bribe Payers Index

  6. PROMOTING REVENUE TRANSPARENCY

  7. What is the Project about? Transparency can change resource curse in to a blessing Project Objectives: • To measure revenue transparency performance and diagnose areas for improvement. • To develop broad standards for revenue transparency. • To support the use of the revenue transparency standards and measures of performance by companies, rating agencies, investors, government regulators and civil society.

  8. Companies Report Method • Desk study • Based on publicly available information • Increased coverage: 42 companies in 21 countries of operation • Indicators (framework): made adjustments to first one but kept comparability • Addressed feedback from first iteration: context, refine questions, id N.A. • Developed special SOE section • Increased Anti-Corruption • Participatory: early company engagement in • Method refinement • Data validation

  9. Project Governance • Reference ( Advisory ) Group • Partners (TI,PWYP,RW) • Industry Associations/Companies • Governments • Investors • Rating Agencies • EITI Secretariat • Experts (industry, measurement, etc.) • Working Group ( max 15 participants) • TI • Project Partners • Measurement Experts • Industry Associations of Company Reps / Governments Rep • Country implementers • EITI Secretariat • Expert Task Forces for concrete tasks • Project Management ADVICE MULTISTAKEHOLDER GUIDANCE MULTISTAKEHOLDER

  10. The questionnaire

  11. COMPANIES REPORT 2007: COMPANY COVERAGE (per Home Country) Gazprom, Rosneft, Lukoil Nexen, Talisman Petro Canada, BP, BG Statoil CNPC, CNOOC, Petrochina, Sinopec Shell Total Kazmunaingaz Amerada Hess, Exxon Mobile, Chevron, Devon, Conoco Philips, Marathon Inpex Repsol NIOC ONGC Eni Sonatrach KPC Pemex Qatar Petronas Aramco Pedevesa NNPC Pertamina GEPetrol SNPC Sonangol Petrobras BHP Billiton, Woodside

  12. Ifcomparissonswere valid...

  13. Looking at our more detailed results and with respect to IOCs and NOCs outside their home jurisdictions, discrepancies are significant between public policy and actual performance disclosure… Good policy and performance Better performance than policy Some policy, some performance Performance Better policy than performance Poor performance disclosure Policy IOCs and NOCs outside their home jurisdictions

  14. …whereas policy appears to matter less with NOCs operating at home. Good policy and performance Performance Medium to good performance, irrespective of policy Poor policy and performance Policy NOCs home operations

  15. Based on our report, our long-term objective should be to move companies from official policy up to actual performance… Performance Policy IOCs and NOCs outside their home jurisdictions

  16. …and to make disclosure of payments a standard element in disclosure of operations… IOCs and NOCs outside their home jurisdictions Operations Payments

  17. Recommendations • Oil and gas companies should proactively report in all areas relevant to revenue transparency on a county-by-country basis. • Home governments and appropriate regulatory agencies should require revenue transparency reporting for the operations of their companies at home and abroad. • Governments from oil and gas producing countries should urgently introduce regulations that require all companies operating in their territories to make public all information relevant to revenue transparency. • Regulatory agencies and companies should improve the accessibility, comprehensiveness and comparability of reporting on all areas of revenue transparency by adopting a uniform global reporting standard.

  18. Challenges • First integrated and systematic approach to companies: no body said it was easy. • Creating and sustaining engagement with stakeholders is challenging: tradeoffs, courage, the meaning of collaborative approach. • Delicate exercise of power balancing: keeping perspective, the meaning of multi-stakeholder approach; dynamics within the actors.

  19. Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) • Lansert av Tony Blair i 2002 • EITI fastsetter internasjonale og aktørspesifikke åpenhetsstandarder innenfor utvinnings-industrien • Internasjonalt multi-stakeholder initiativ som involverer • Betalere av inntekter (selskaper) • Mottakere av inntekter (myndigheter) • Brukere av informasjon (sivilsamfunnet) • Giverland • IMF, Verdensbanken, EBRD • Investorer

  20. EITI-kriteriene • Regulær publisering av alle materielle betalinger fra olje-, gass- og gruveselskaper til myndighetene og alle inntekter myndighetene mottar fra olje-, gass- og gruveselskaper. • Alle betalinger og inntekter (som nevnt over)skal være gjenstand for en kredibel og uavhengig revisjon hvor internasjonale regnskapsstandarder blir benyttet. • Betalinger og inntekter skal sammenstilles av en uavhengig administrator som benytter internasjonal regnskapsstandard. Administratorens konklusjoner skal publiseres.

  21. EITI-kriteriene 4. Kriteriene gjelder alle selskaper også statseide selskaper. 5. Det sivile samfunn skal være aktive som deltager i utformingen, overvåkningen og evalueringen av prosessen og skal også bidra i den offentlige debatten. 6. En offentlig og finansiell bærekraftig arbeidsplan for alle punkter nevnt over skal fremlegges av myndighetene. Arbeidsplanen skal inkludere målbare størrelser, en tidsplan for implementering og en vurdering av mulige kapasitetsbeskrankninger. .

  22. Business Principles for Countering Bribery • Selskapet skal forby bestikkelser i alle former enten direkte eller indirekte. • Selskapet skal iverksette et anti-korrupsjonsprogram .

  23. Elementer i et anti-korrupsjonsprogram • Gjøre ansatte kjent med relevante lovbestemmelser som gjelder for korrupsjon både hjemme og i aktuelle land • Innfør etiske retningslinjer og følg opp med kurs og opplæring, • Etabler internkontroller og rutiner for å avdekke uregelmessigheter • Innfør et kontaktpunkt for varsling – gjerne eksternt • Undersøk korrupsjonsrisiki i aktuelle markeder

More Related