1 / 40

Sample-and-Hold (S/H) Basics

Sample-and-Hold (S/H) Basics. ZOH vs. Track-and-Hold (T/H). Zero acquisition time Infinite bandwidth Not realistic. T/2 acquisition time Finite bandwidth Practical. A Simple T/H (Top-Plate Sampling). MOS technology is naturally suitable for implementing T/H

Télécharger la présentation

Sample-and-Hold (S/H) Basics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sample-and-Hold (S/H) Basics

  2. ZOH vs. Track-and-Hold (T/H) • Zero acquisition time • Infinite bandwidth • Not realistic • T/2 acquisition time • Finite bandwidth • Practical

  3. A Simple T/H (Top-Plate Sampling) • MOS technology is naturally suitable for implementing T/H • The lowpass SC network determines the tracking bandwidth • Non-idealities: signal-dependent Ron, charge injection, aperture, etc.

  4. Tracking Bandwidth (TBW) • Tracking bandwidth determines how promptly Vo can follow Vi • Typically TBW is many times greater than the max signal bandwidth • What’s wrong with the concept of “linear filtering” if Ron is constant?

  5. Dispersion • Magnitude response • Non-uniform phase delay • Non-uniform group delay

  6. Dispersion • Waveform is not very sensitive to the lowpass magnitude response as long as the signal bandwidth is on the order of TBW • Waveform distortion is mainly due to non-uniform phase and group delays

  7. Signal-Dependent Ron • Signal-dependent Ron→ signal-dependent TBW → extra waveform distortion • Neither signal-dependent Ron nor dispersion is of concern if TBW is • sufficiently large (>> fin, depending on the target accuracy)

  8. Ideal T/H • Sufficient tracking bandwidth → negligible tracking error • Well-defined sampling instant (asserted by clock rising/falling edge) • Zero track-mode and hold-mode offset errors

  9. T/H Errors (Track Mode) • Finite tracking bandwidth → tracking error, T/H memory • Track-mode offset, gain error, and nonlinearity

  10. Acquisition Time (tacq) Short L, thin tox, large W, large Vov, and small Vi help reduce Ron

  11. T/H Errors (T-to-H Transition) • Pedestal error (often signal-dependent) resulted from switch turn-off • nonidealities (clock feedthrough and charge injection) • Aperture delay – the delay Δt b/t hold command and hold action • Aperture jitter – the random variation in Δt (i.e., sampling clock jitter)

  12. Switch Non-Idealities

  13. Pedestal Error of Top-Plate T/H Slow turn-off: Fast turn-off: Watch out for nonlinear errors!

  14. Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff of T/H Pedestal error: TBW: Therefore: Technology scaling improves T/H performance!

  15. Aperture Delay (Δt) • Fixed aperture delay is usually not of problem in a single-path T/H • Non-uniform aperture delays among time-interleaved T/H paths cause significant errors (Δt1, Δt2… are also called sampling clock skew)

  16. Aperture Jitter Ref: M. Shinagawa, Y. Akazawa, and T. Wakimoto, “Jitter analysis of high-speed sampling systems,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 25, issue 1, pp. 220-224, 1990.

  17. Aperture Jitter

  18. Aperture Jitter

  19. T/H Errors (Hold Mode) • Hold-mode droop caused by off-switch/diode/gate leakage • Hold-mode input feedthrough (i.e., due to capacitive coupling)

  20. Evaluating T/H Performance kT/C noise: T = 300K SNDR: Noise Distortion Jitter

  21. MOS S/H Techniques

  22. Simple Top-Plate Sampling • Pros • Simple, minimum number of devices • Potentially wideband, zero track-mode offset • Cons • Signal-dependent tracking bandwidth • Signal-dependent charge injection and clock feedthrough • Signal-dependent aperture delay (sampling point)

  23. Signal-Dependent Aperture Delay • Non-uniform sampling due to signal-dependent aperture delay causes distortion in top-plate S/H • Sharp clock edge and small Vin mitigate the delay variation

  24. Signal Distortion ← 2nd-order 

  25. CMOS Switch • Ron still depends on Vin and is sensitive to N/P mismatch • Large parasitic cap due to PMOS switch for symmetric Ron • Clock rising/falling edge alignment

  26. Clock Bootstrapping • Constant gate overdrive voltage VGS = VDD for the switch • Ron is not dependent on Vin to the first order (body effect?) • NMOS device only with less parasitic capacitance

  27. Clock Bootstrapping Ref: A. M. Abo and P. R. Gray, “A 1.5-V, 10-bit, 14.3-MS/s CMOS pipeline ADC,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, issue 5, pp. 599-606, 1999.

  28. Clock Bootstrapping (Φ=0)

  29. Clock Bootstrapping (Φ=1)

  30. Dummy Switch • Initial size of dummy chosen with the assumption of a 50/50 split of Qch; usually (W/L)dummy < ½(W/L)switch in practice • The nonlinear dependence of CI on Zi, CS, and clock rise/fall time makes it difficult to achieve a precise cancellation • Ф_ rising edge must trail Ф falling edge

  31. Balanced Switch + Dummy • TBW • Parasitics Ref: L. A. Bienstman and H. J. De Man, “An eight-channel 8 bit microprocessor compatible NMOS D/A converter with programmable scaling,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 15, issue 6, pp. 1051-1059, 1980.

  32. Fully-Differential T/H E.g. • All even-order distortions cancelled, including the signal-dependent aperture delay-induced distortion • Actual cancellation limited by P/N mismatch (1-10% typically)

  33. Bottom-Plate Sampling • AC-ground switch opens slightly earlier than input switches • Signal-independent CF and CI of switch Φe to the first order! • Input switch can be further bootstrapped • Typical for applications of more than 8-bit resolution • Less tracking bandwidth due to more switches in series • Signal swing at node X is not entirely zero!

  34. Sample-and-Hold Amplifier(SHA)

  35. Inverting SHA • Inverting, closed-loop gain determined by the ratio CS/CH • CMOS or bootstrapped switches are required when passing signals with large swing (where?)

  36. Inverting SHA (Track-Mode) • CF and CI are independent of Vin and cancelled differentially • Φ1e switch is equivalent to two switches of half channel length → faster, less CF and CI

  37. Inverting SHA (Hold-Mode) • CM? • DM? • For 1X gain (CS = CH), the feedback factor is about 1/2 • Floating switch Φ2 in hold-mode → flexible input common mode • Useful for single-ended to differential conversion

  38. Differential Mode DM half circuit  • DM charge transfer is complete

  39. Common Mode CM half circuit  • CM charge is not transferred!

  40. Flip-Around SHA • Non-inverting, 1X closed-loop gain • Close-to-unity feedback factor in hold mode • CF/CI independent of Vin and cancelled differentially

More Related