1 / 25

Accurate Projection of Small-Scale Raster Datasets

Accurate Projection of Small-Scale Raster Datasets. 21 st International Cartographic Conference 10 – 16 Aug 2003 Durban, South Africa. Accurate Projection of Small-Scale Raster Datasets. E. Lynn Usery, USGS, Mid-Continent Mapping Center, Rolla, MO

portia
Télécharger la présentation

Accurate Projection of Small-Scale Raster Datasets

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Accurate Projection of Small-Scale Raster Datasets 21st International Cartographic Conference 10 – 16 Aug 2003 Durban, South Africa

  2. Accurate Projection of Small-Scale Raster Datasets • E. Lynn Usery, USGS, Mid-Continent Mapping Center, Rolla, MO • Jeong Chang Seong, Northern Michigan University, Marquette, MI • Dan Steinwand, Science Applications International Corp., EROS Data Center, Sioux Falls, SD • Michael P. Finn, USGS, MCMC, Rolla

  3. Outline • Motivation • Objectives • Approach • Methods • Results • Conclusions

  4. Motivation – What is the Problem? • Projection of global datasets with conventional GIS software results in error • Errors affect global models and invalidate results

  5. Objectives • Develop a dynamic projection for raster data • Determine methods to measure error and apply error correction • Develop a better categorical resampler • Develop an system to support map projection selection

  6. Approach • Empirical Testing • Compute exact areas in spherical coordinates and replicate cell-by-cell in projected data • Develop error theory using horizontal and vertical scale factors • Develop a categorical resampler with user selection of output pixel on down-sampling • Design and Implement a Decision Support System

  7. Empirical Testing • Multiple Datasets • Global land cover, 30 arc-sec • Global Life (ecological) Zones, ½ degree • Global vegetation, 1 degree • Multiple Projections • Eckert IV • Hammer • Sinusoidal • Mollweide • Goode Homolosine • Wagner IV • Robinson (non-equal area)

  8. Empirical Test ResultsUse of Commercial GIS Software • Software is not always reliable for global projection • Some projections do not run to completion • Inverse projection results in extension of raster areas to 0-degree lines • Repeat areas at edges of projection • Computation times extensive

  9. Michael P. Finn: Mollweide from Commercial Software

  10. Mollweide from USGS mapimg

  11. Dynamic Projection of Raster Cells • Compute areas of pixels in geographic coordinates • Map each raster line to appropriate area • Result is accurate for computation and analysis, but each raster line has different size

  12. Areas of Single Pixels Computed from Spherical Coordinates (in meters2)

  13. Error Theory and ModelingBest projection for global scale • Criteria • It shouldn’t lose pixel values when a local-scale dataset is projected to the global-scale projection • It shouldn’t lose pixel values when a dataset in the global-scale projection is projected at a very accurate local-scale projection • Efficient storage

  14. Reprojection accuracies between global and local projections

  15. Accuracy increase due to the change of skew angle

  16. Error Theory and Modeling Summary • Scale factor model explains most pixel value changes • The change of pixel values occurs regardless of pixel resolutions • Significant change as category numbers increase • Significant change due to skewing

  17. Categorical Resampling • Down-sampling to larger pixel size • aggregating multiple input pixels to one output pixel • Nearest neighbor selects one pixel value • Many pixels involved • use simple statistical methods to determine output image pixels based on the area the pixel coverage in the input image

  18. Extreme Downsampling and Reprojection with the Nearest Neighbor

  19. Extreme Downsampling and Reprojection with the New Algorithm

  20. Decision Support System for Map Projection Selection • Global, continental, regional (10 ° min) • Preserve shape, area, compromise • Data type – raster or vector • User input determines projection selection

  21. Conclusions • Projection of global raster data is a significant problem • Area preservation in raster data is possible for computation and analysis, not for display • A scale factor model accounts for most error and shows the sinusoidal projection to preserve areas better than others • Categorical resampling with modal categories yields better results than nearest neighbor methods • A Decision Support System is needed and now available

  22. Addition Information • Available at: • http://mcmcweb.er.usgs.gov/carto_research/projection/index.html • E-mail: mfinn@usgs.gov

  23. Accurate Projection of Small-Scale Raster Datasets 21st International Cartographic Conference 10 – 16 Aug 2003 Durban, South Africa

More Related