1 / 19

LACCD Building the Future

LACCD Building the Future. THOMAS HALL Director Facilities Planning and Development . Delivery Methods. Design Bid Build Design Build Lease-Leaseback CM at-risk Design Assist Job Order Contracting (JOC). Are we able to use Design Build?. STATUTORY AUTHORITY –

presley
Télécharger la présentation

LACCD Building the Future

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LACCDBuilding the Future THOMAS HALL Director Facilities Planning and Development

  2. Delivery Methods • Design Bid Build • Design Build • Lease-Leaseback • CM at-risk • Design Assist • Job Order Contracting (JOC)

  3. Are we able to use Design Build? • STATUTORY AUTHORITY – • California Community College Design Build • AB 1000, EC 81700 (September 18, 2002) • Pilot Program – • Enabling Legislation for Cal Community College Design Build • Project Value Threshold Minimum of $10 Million • SB 614(October 11, 2007) • Reducing Project Value Threshold to $2.5 Million • Extends Sunset Provision

  4. Design-Bid-Build Design-Bid-Build • TIME – Long, Non-Concurrent Activities in Schedule (Scope, Design, Bid, Award) • QUALIFICATIONS - Low Bid Award Solely on Price – Any Responsive Bid Must be Selected • RISK - Owner responsible for Errors and Omissions in the Design • COOPERATION - Most Adversarial – Incentive to Identify Weaknesses by Contractor • ADMINISTRATION - High Administrative Burden – Change Order Requests and RFIs • OWNERS INVOLVEMENT – Required but not onerous

  5. Design Build TIME – Many Concurrent Activities in Schedule and reduced overall duration QUALIFICATIONS – Best Value Selection based on Qualifications, Innovation, References and Price RISK - Design Builder responsible for Errors and Omissions/ Coordination (Party Most In Control) COOPERATION - Less Adversarial – Incentive Develop Quality Documents Early and Coordinate ADMINISTRATION - Low Administrative Burden – Change Order Requests and RFIs minimized OWNER INVOLVEMENT - Requires a greater commitment of owners time

  6. DESIGN / BUILD TEAM • Includes • A/E • Contractor • Sub-Contractors • Hired Through • RFP • Low Bid • Design Competition • Did not use a bridging document • Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP)

  7. Definition – “Best Value” BEST VALUE – A selection process based on predetermined criteria that may include Price, Design, Past Performance, Ability to Perform the Work, or other criteria as defined in the RFQ or RFP.

  8. Request for Proposals Selection Scoring: • Price – 35% • Design Excellence – 35% • Project Management – 15% • Outreach – 10% • Safety – 5%

  9. LACCD Design Build Process • Step 1 – Team Prequalification • Qualifications Based creation of prequalified pools by project type • Step 2 – Project Specific Shortlisting • Relevant Pool invited to submit for specific projects and shortlisted by relevant experience, references and personnel • Step 3 – Request for Proposals • Design Competition amongst shortlisted teams for final award

  10. Completed Design Build Projects • Trade Technical College Project • 1 Structure • 900 Car Parking Garage • Southwest College Project • 6 Structures • Facilities Maintenance and Operations • Student Services Building • Field House • Parking Structure • Stadium • Sheriff’s Office

  11. Trade Tech Experience • First Design Build Project • Two Proposals – Design Competition • Parking Structure Cost • Original Budget - $13 million • Final Cost - $12 million • Project Completion • Projected – 18 months • Delivered – 14 months

  12. Trade Tech - Points to Note • Formal Partnered Process • Strong Aesthetic Value • Difficulty in Close Out

  13. Southwest Experience • Reduced Cost Per Square Foot • $450 using traditional methods • $200 actual with design-build • Significant Speed Advantage • 6 buildings in 18 months • Startling Transformation

  14. Southwest – Points to Note • $63 million project cost • Fast Track – 18 months • DSA review issues

  15. PROJECTS WELL-SUITED FORDESIGN / BUILD • COST MORE THAN $2.5 MILLION • NO, OR LIMITED, SITE ISSUES • NOT TECHNICALLY COMPLEX ???? • REPETITIVE IN NATURE • BUDGET CONSTRAINTS PRESENT • TIME CONSTRAINTS PRESENT

  16. DESIGN / BUILD ADVANTAGES • TEAM WORK ENHANCED WITH ONE TEAM • GUARANTEED PRICE HELPS CONTROL COST • GMP PROVIDES NO INCENTIVE FOR CHANGE ORDERS • MAJOR TIME SAVINGS OPPORTUNITIES

  17. DESIGN / BUILD DISADVANTAGES • SCHEDULE AND BUDGET CONSTRAINTS MAKE FOCUS ON QUALITY DIFFICULT • GMP OFFER MAY NOT COME WITHIN AVAILABLE BUDGET • SIGNIFICANT STAFF TIME REQUIRED TO MAKE DECISIONS FOR D/B TEAM • ARCHITECT IS NOT INDEPENDENT

  18. Contact Information • Thomas Hall • thall@laccd.edu • Phone 213-891-2119

More Related