1 / 21

Project 2: Study of Separated Flow in a Low- Pressure Turbine*

Project 2: Study of Separated Flow in a Low- Pressure Turbine*. Joshua Combs, Aerospace Engineering, Junior, University of Cincinnati Devon Riddle, Aerospace Engineering, Senior, University of Cincinnati ASSISTED BY: Michael Cline, Graduate Research Assistant

primo
Télécharger la présentation

Project 2: Study of Separated Flow in a Low- Pressure Turbine*

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Project 2: Study of Separated Flow in a Low- Pressure Turbine* Joshua Combs, Aerospace Engineering, Junior, University of Cincinnati Devon Riddle, Aerospace Engineering, Senior, University of Cincinnati ASSISTED BY: Michael Cline, Graduate Research Assistant Dr. Kirti Ghia, Faculty Mentor *Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Grant ID No. DUE-0756921

  2. Project Goals • Goal 1: Understand the phenomenon of flow separation on streamlined bodies. • Goal 2: Understand methodologies for analyzing and controlling flow separation.

  3. Objectives • Objective 1: Investigate characteristics of the low-pressure turbine. • Objective 2: Explore methods of flow separation and control. • Objective 3: Disseminate findings in a technical report.

  4. Motivation • Reduce engine weight (COST!!) i.e. use fewer blades • Increases the amount of work done by each blade • Adverse pressure gradient and low Reynolds number induces flow separation thereby decreasing low-pressure turbine (LPT) efficiency • Must CONTROL flow in LPT to reduce flow separation

  5. Terminology Adverse Pressure Gradient (APG): Pressure increases in the flow direction John Anderson, Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, 5th • Flow Separation: Detachment from body surface Michael Cline, 2012 AY-REU Program

  6. Terminology continued Reynolds Number (Re): Dimensionless quantity representing the ratio of inertial forces to viscous forces • Indicates whether flow is laminar or turbulent Re ≈ 10e6 Transition Region: Zone between laminar and turbulent flow Re ≈ 10e5 John Anderson, Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, 5th Boundary Layer (BL): Thin viscous region adjacent to the body

  7. Flow Control Methods Two main categories: Active BL Suction Synthetic Jet Plasma Actuator Passive Trip Wire Vortex Generators Roughness …There are others, these are just to name a few

  8. Passive Control Tripwire • Promotes transition from laminar BL to turbulent BL • Increases momentum to overcome APG Vortex Generator • “Re-energizes” BL • Delays flow separation (Top-Bottom): “Drag Reduction on Aerodynamic Shapes with Ground Effect”, http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/aerodynamics/q0228.shtml

  9. Active Control Plasma Actuators • Adds momentum through a body force. • Proven to reattach flow effectively; no fluid injection Professor Wei Shyy University of Michigan

  10. Types of Plasma Actuators • Single Dielectric Barrier Discharge (SDBD) Plasma Actuators • Glow Discharge Actuators • Plasma Synthetic Jet Actuators

  11. Single Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuators • Widely utilized • Desirable features for use in air at atmospheric pressures • Active airfoil leading edge separation control • Control airfoil dynamic stall • Bluff body flow control • Boundary layer flow control • Internal and external flow applications. • Effective at high subsonic, transonic, and supersonic Mach numbers • Two electrodes separated by dielectric barrier material. • One electrode on aerodynamic surface exposed to air • Covered electrode encapsulated in dielectric material • Voltage is applied igniting the DBD • Unique: sustain large volume discharge at atmospheric pressure without arcing. Self limiting. • Flow control created through generated body force vector field mixing with the external flows momentum.

  12. Experiment using SDBD actuators • Cylinder • Side image of the smooth flow closely attached to the cylinder. • Close up on the flow behind the cylinder. Wake is minimized. Professor Wei Shyy University of Michigan

  13. Experiment using SDBD actuators continued • Cylinder • Side image of flow without the use of SDBD. • Close up on the flow behind the cylinder. Wake is large and out of control. Professor Wei Shyy University of Michigan

  14. Plasma Synthetic Jet Actuator • Designed for flow control that consists of an annular electrode in quiescent and flat plate boundary layer flows. • SJA formed from the working flow of the system • Name came from: • Circular plasma region produced on the actuation generates vertical zero-net mass flux (synthetic) jet. • Actuator pulses forming a starting vortex ring. • Advects ahead of jet and secondary vortex rings near actuator surface. • Pulsing frequency is varied, creating multiple vortex rings • Vortex ring interactions • Increases peak velocity • Increases streamwise extent of the jet.

  15. Experiment using Synthetic Jet Actuators • Investigating plasma actuators and synthetic jets to develop a plasma flow control device that is more effective. • Observed varied pulse frequencies and jet characteristics • Peak velocity • Steady operation of the actuator without pulse frequencies • Constant velocity

  16. Experiment using Synthetic Jet Actuators continued • Both graphs show the streamwise distribution of local maximum mean axial velocity • Peak velocity pulsing at 10 Hz • Optimum time of operation is less than 24 ms • Interesting observation being that it never returns to zero velocity • Suggests optimum operational frequency closer to 10 Hz.

  17. Computational Fluid Dynamics • Method of analyzing fluid mechanics with theoretical and experimental techniques • Utilizes algorithms and numerical methods to solve and analyze fluid flow problems • Computer carries out the calculations of time dependent interactions between the body and the fluid

  18. …Future Work • Generate “baseline” results for the LPT • Learn how to model flow and implement into ANSYS Fluent (CFD software) • Learn to used programming languages required for CFD (i.e. C++)

  19. 19 Timeline

  20. Questions?

  21. References • http://projei.tistory.com/47 • Huan, Junhui, Separation Control Over Low Pressure Turbine Blades Using Plasma Actuators, University of Notre Dame, 2005 • Hilbert, Brian F., Drag Reduction on Aerodynamic Shapes with Groudn Effect, Clarkston University, 2011 • Xiaoping Xu, Zhou Zhou, Ruijun Fan, JunliWang, Investigation of Active Flow Control on Aerodynamic Performance of HALE UAV Airfoil, Second International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation, 2010 • Shin, J., Narayanaswamy, V., Raja, L.L., Clemens, N.T., "Characterization of a Direct-Current Glow Discharge Plasma Actuator in Low-Pressure Supersonic Flow," AIAA Journal, Vol. 45, No. 7, pp. 1596-1605, 2007.

More Related