1 / 10

Physicalnet: Cross-network Applications for Multi-user Sensor and Actuator Networks

Physicalnet: Cross-network Applications for Multi-user Sensor and Actuator Networks. Pascal A. Vicaire (pascal@cs.virginia.edu) John A. Stankovic (stankovic@cs.virginia.edu) University of Virginia. Goals. Programming sensor network applications from any PC connected to the Internet

prince
Télécharger la présentation

Physicalnet: Cross-network Applications for Multi-user Sensor and Actuator Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Physicalnet: Cross-network Applications forMulti-user Sensor and Actuator Networks Pascal A. Vicaire (pascal@cs.virginia.edu) John A. Stankovic (stankovic@cs.virginia.edu) University of Virginia

  2. Goals • Programming sensor network applications from any PC connected to the Internet • Global / cross-network applications => Access rights • Multi-user => Conflict resolution • Ease of programming => Discovery and manipulation of large sets of nodes => Heterogeneity => Mobility => Compatibility

  3. Global accessibilty Physicalnet is a Service Oriented Architecture Each node has a unique global identifier Nodes are not tied to a particular geographical location Physicalnet Users Negotiators Gateways Service Providers

  4. Access rights All Physicalnet services are composed of states and events For each service: Localization rights For each state: Reading rights Writing rights Priority For each event: Idem Physicalnet Temperature Sensor Access Right Table | Priority | Location | Sensor | Rate John | 1 | L | RW | RW Mike | 2 | L | RW | R- Peter | 3 | - | RW | RW Tom | 4 | - | -- | --

  5. Conflict resolution Service specific resolvers to manage conflicts between user requirements Examples: First come first serve OR, AND operators Highest priority Minimum Access to actual state value within application Physicalnet Users Negotiator Requirement Table App. Service State/Event Args A1 temp1 samplingPeriod 10s A2 temp1 samplingPeriod 15s A3 temp1 samplingPeriod 20s Resolver Service State/Event Args temp1 samplingPeriod 10s Towards Service Providers (Sensors / Actuators)

  6. Programming API Large sets Cross networks Dynamic sets heterogeneous sets Mobility Compatibility Physicalnet

  7. FireAlarm Application: Code Size:~80 lines of code Installation time:~15s for 36 nodes distributed across 2 remote networks Average responsiveness: ~3s Preliminary Results:

  8. Conclusion • Our goal is to create a framework to facilitate the programming of cross-network applications of multi-user sensor and actuator networks. • Our solution uses a service oriented architecture that supports node heterogeneity, node mobility, access rights, conflict resolution mechanisms. • It provides a high level java API to specify programs using dynamic logical sets of nodes.

  9. Thank You! Questions? Pascal A. Vicaire (pascal@cs.virginia.edu) John A. Stankovic (stankovic@cs.virginia.edu)

  10. Global accessibility => Access rights Resolution? Specification? Mechanisms? Multiple users => Conflict resolution Resolution? Specification? Mechanisms? Ease of programming => Discovery and manipulation of large sets of nodes => Sets that span multiple networks => Heterogeneous sets of nodes => Mobility => Compatibility with other service oriented architectures Why is it Difficult?

More Related