1 / 20

Joining forces for food security – Linking earth observation and crowd-sourcing

Joining forces for food security – Linking earth observation and crowd-sourcing. Markus Enenkel Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation Vienna University of Technology Email: markus.enenkel@geo.tuwien.ac.at.

purity
Télécharger la présentation

Joining forces for food security – Linking earth observation and crowd-sourcing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Joining forces for food security – Linking earth observation and crowd-sourcing Markus EnenkelDepartment of Geodesy and Geoinformation Vienna University of Technology Email: markus.enenkel@geo.tuwien.ac.at SatelliteSoilMoisture Validation andApplication Workshop, Amsterdam, 10-11 July 2014

  2. Outline • The User Perspective • Soil Moisture vs. Droughts/Food Insecurity • POETS (Python Earth Observation Tools) • The Role of Mobile Applications • Conclusion markus.enenkel@geo.tuwien.ac.at

  3. Outline • The User Perspective • Soil Moisture vs. Droughts/Food Insecurity • POETS (Python Earth Observation Tools) • The Role of Mobile Applications • Conclusion markus.enenkel@geo.tuwien.ac.at

  4. Biophysicalparameterretrieval, dataassimilation, modelling, etc. Exosphere Microwave Remote Sensing (ofSoilMoisture) Thermosphere Mesosphere Remote Sensing Stratosphere ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Trophosphere Google Maps, etc. Traditional Decision-Making ofAidOrganizations

  5. Outline • The User Perspective • Soil Moisture vs. Droughts/Food Insecurity • POETS (Python Earth Observation Tools) • The Role of Mobile Applications • Conclusion markus.enenkel@geo.tuwien.ac.at

  6. Droughts vs. Food Security • Most complex of all natural disasters; Slow-onset • No general definition of drought • No physically measurable variable • Two different fields of research (no “IPCC” for food security) • Large gap between scientific findings and decision-making • Satellite technologies (soil moisture)far from complete exploitation

  7. The Issue of Drought Management ? Past Future Future

  8. SATIDA (Satellite Technologies for Improved Drought Risk Assessment) In a nutshell: • 18 months; Funded by Austria Research Promotion Agency • Collaboration of researchers from different disciplines • Main objective: Test and visualize the added-value of satellite-derived datasets and seasonal forecasts • Link drought risk to socio-economic vulnerability via mobile applications (smart phones, tablets) • www.satida.net

  9. markus.enenkel@geo.tuwien.ac.at

  10. Outline • The User Perspective • Soil Moisture vs. Droughts/Food Insecurity • POETS (Python Earth Observation Tools) • The Role of Mobile Applications • Conclusion markus.enenkel@geo.tuwien.ac.at

  11. POETS (Python Open Earth Observation Tools)

  12. Outline • The User Perspective • Soil Moisture vs. Droughts/Food Insecurity • POETS (Python Earth Observation Tools) • The Role of Mobile Applications • Conclusion markus.enenkel@geo.tuwien.ac.at

  13. The Role of Mobile Applications • Access to monitoring and forecasting datasets • Collection of socio-economic information • Full exploitation of smart phone features • Questions focus on level of malnutrition, food basket, access to resources, etc. • Field test in Ethiopia and the Central African Republic with Doctors without Borders in 2015 markus.enenkel@geo.tuwien.ac.at

  14. Mobile Applications

  15. Outline • The User Perspective • Soil Moisture vs. Droughts/Food Insecurity • POETS (Python Earth Observation Tools) • The Role of Mobile Applications • Conclusion markus.enenkel@geo.tuwien.ac.at

  16. Conclusion (I) • Simple data access and clear visualization are vital • Added-value: Increased lead time for logistics, HR, pro-active operational planning • Decision-makers need information about environmental AND socio-economic conditions • Mobile apps help to relate index-outputs to conditions on the ground (validation) • Smart phones create a feeling of ownership markus.enenkel@geo.tuwien.ac.at

  17. Arrowspointingupindicateworsedroughtconditions in thefuture

  18. Conclusion (I) • Vital: Simple data access and clear visualization • Added-value: Increased lead time for logistics, HR, pro-active operational planning • Decision-makers need information about environmental AND socio-economic conditions • Mobile apps help to relate index-outputs to conditions on the ground (validation) • Smart phones create a feeling of ownership markus.enenkel@geo.tuwien.ac.at

  19. Conclusion (II) • Mobile applications need a robust back-end • They must as well work online/offline • EO can be powerful when capacities and limitations are identified and explained to the user (non-generic approach) • Solutions need to be developed with, not for users • Approaches like the EODC are promising, if they manage to create a network markus.enenkel@geo.tuwien.ac.at

  20. History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme. Mark Twain

More Related