1 / 30

Hadron Physics with PANDA

Hadron Physics with PANDA. QCD well understood at high Q 2 Emergence of eff. DoF at low Q 2 Study of the strong interaction in the transition region P henomena appear that are hard to predict from QCD : e.g. confinement, nature of hadrons, hadronic masses….

qamra
Télécharger la présentation

Hadron Physics with PANDA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hadron Physics with PANDA • QCD well understood at high Q2Emergence of eff. DoF at low Q2 • Study of the strong interaction in the transition region • Phenomena appearthat are hard to predict from QCD: e.g. confinement, nature ofhadrons, hadronic masses… J. Pumplin et al., JHEP 0207 (2002) 012

  2. How Do We Study the Hadrons? • Hadron Structure: Hard (virtual) photons, typically accessed via leptons, allow us to measure the constituents- Generalized parton distribution- Drell-Yan processes- Time-like form factor of the proton • Hadron Spectroscopy:Excitation spectrum accesses rare quark/gluon configurations- Search for glueballs, hybrids, molecules, tetraquarks … - Baryon spectroscopy- In-medium effects • Hadron Interactions: Pion/Kaon reactions, as well as Hyperons and Hypernuclei provide information about the strong force- Double hypernuclei

  3. Hadron Structure with Electromagnetic Probes

  4. Time-Like &Space-Like EM Form Factors SL Space-like • Constraints: • GEp(0)=1 • GMp(0)=μp • GEp(4mp²)= GMp(4mp²) • Asymptotics • |GE,M(q²)| ~ (q²)-² e- e- TL Time-like q2<0 p e- q2>0 e+ p+p  e++e- + X Unphysical region p p p _ Real FFs Complex FFs _ 0 q2 e+p e+p p+p ↔ e++e- 3.52 (GeV/c)2 • (Phragmén-Lindelhöftheorem) • Imaginary part of Time-Like form factors vanishes for q²→+∞

  5. Time-Like& Space-Like EM Form Factors electron scattering annihilation pp e+e- q2 > 4mp2 - e+e- pp (BES, Novosibirsk, PANDA) e- scattering ( Jlab…. A2/Mainz) 100 From S. Pacetti, arXiv:1012.1232v1 Spacelike 10-1 Timelike p GM/μp unphysical 10-2 10-3 -10 30 20 10 -30 0 -20 Dispersion relations: q2 < 0

  6. ProtonEM FormFactorsin Time-LikeRegion _ Cross-sections: pp → e+e- - 4mp2 _ angular distributions: pp →e+e- FENICE+DM2 (e+e-) - BABAR: (e+e-pp) - (pp) E835 LEAR (pp) Geff • Geff: large error bars above 13 (GeV/c)2 • |GE/GM| : • Inconsistent data abovethreshold • Lack of precise data above 5 (GeV/c)2 -

  7. Extract Time-Like |GE| and |GM| for proton up to 14 (GeV/c)2 from lepton angular distributions in pp e+e- reaction and measureGeff up to 30 (GeV/c)2 - Goal of PANDA Measurements - • Two major challenges: • Decrease of sensitivity to GE withincreasing q2 • Hugehadronic background •  (pp +-) /  (pp e+e-) ~ 106 - -

  8. Counting Rate and Sensitivity to |GE| ~120 days, L = 2x1032cm-2s-1 Lint=2 fb-1 Statisticalerrorsonly GE=0 GE=GM GE=3GM M. Sudolet al. EPJA 44 (2010) 373 Ntot=1.1 106 Ntot=64000Ntot=2000

  9. _ q2 = 8.21 (GeV/c)2 2.4 106 s(p+p-)/s(e+e-) 1.5 105 cosqCM Rejection of pp +-Background parametrization of CERN data for p p → +- s < 6 (GeV/c)2 : Legendre polynomial fits s > 6 (GeV/c)2 : countingrules (Ong et Van de Wiele, IPNO-DR-08-01) or Reggetrajectories (idem, EPJA46 (2010) 291). - - pp π+π- New measurements of p p → +- will be provided by PANDA (also important for pQCD mechanism studies) - ? s(p+p-)/s(e+e-)

  10. Courtesy of S. Pacetti E. Tomasi-Gustafsson and M.P. Rekalo, PLB504,291 E. Tomasi-Gustafsson, arXIv:0907.4442 Geff PANDA < 1% ~10% ~23% ~50% Phragmèn-Lindelöf theorem ? Time-Like Form Factor Measurement with PANDA : Estimates of Precision L=2 fb-1 Sudol et al. EPJA 44 (2010) 373 PANDA BES BES pQCD ?

  11. Geff < 1% ~10% ~23% ~50% Time-Like Form Factor Measurement with PANDA : Estimates of Precision L=2 fb-1 -VDM: F. Iachello et al., PLB43, 171 (1973) …extended VDM, PRC66, 045501 (2002) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson et al., EPJA24 (2005) 419 Sudol et al. EPJA 44 (2010) 373 PANDA PANDA BES BES PANDA willbring Precisedetermination of |GE|and | GM | up to 14 (GeV/c)2 Geff up to 30 (GeV/c)2 : transition towardsperturbative QCD pQCD ?

  12. 2 Contributions and Radiative Corrections Rosenbluth method Important role of 2 exchange and radiative corrections • Advantage of annihilation reactions pp e+e- The e+ ande-angular distributions are measured in the sameexperiment • PANDA measurements are sensitive to oddcos  terms d/dcose ~ A (1+ b cosesin2 e + c cos2e+..) withb=5% or more (M. Sudol et al EPJA 44(2010) 373). Polarization measurements ? No C-odd terms contribution C-odd terms contribution _

  13. Hadron Spectroscopy with Antiproton Annihilation

  14. Why Antiprotons? • difficult to make • BUT: • gluon rich process • gain ~2 GeV in annihilation, reduced momentum transfer • all fermion-antifermion quantum numbers accessible • very high resolution in formation reactions • high angular momentum accessible

  15. c.f. Only JPC = 1-- allowed in e+e- (to 1st order) _ Particle production in pp collisions Formation: _ _ All JPC allowed for (qq) accessible in pp

  16. Example: χc1,2 • Invariant mass reconstruction depends • on the detector resolution ≈ 10 MeV Formation: Resonance scan: Resolution depends on the beam resolution E760@Fermilab ≈ 240 keV PANDA ≈ 30 keV

  17. Charmonium Spectroscopy _ • open questionsbelow DD threshold: widths, branching • new „XYZ“ states (Belle, BaBar, CLEO, CDF, D0, …) • newdegreesoffreedom: molecules, tetraquarks, gluonicexcitations? • conventionalstatesabove DD • highLstates: access in pp but not in e+e- _ _

  18. New Charmonium-like Discoveries in addition to many more open charm states

  19. How can PANDA contribute? ε = 32 % S/N = 2 • simulation studies for several channels and √s: • J/ψπ+π-,J/ψπ0π0, χcγJ/ψγγ, J/ψγ, J/ψη, ηcγ • direct formation in pp: line shapes ! • d target: pn with p spectator tagging, e.g. Z-(4430) _ _ C. Hanhartet al., PRD 76 (2007) 034007 E. Braaten, M. Lu, PRD 77 (2008) 014029 J/yp+p- _ _ _ D0D0p0 D0D*0 D0D*0 ≈ 100 events/day ≈ 40 events/day S/N =25 J/yp+p-

  20. Beyond standard quark configurations • QCD allows much more than what we have observed: Exotics: Baryons Mesons may have JPC not allowed for qq _ Courtesy C. Hanhart

  21. _ Exotics production in pp collisions • Production: all JPC accessible Hybrids JPC exotic Exotic JPC would be clear signal G.Bali, EPJA 1 (2004) 1 (PS)

  22. Open charm: The Dsspectrum • newnarrowstates Ds*(2317) and Ds*(2460) seenbyBaBar, Belle, CLEO • massessignificantlylowerthanquark model expectation • statesare just below DK and D*K threshold • interpretationunclear: DK/D*K molecules, tetraquarks, chiraldoublers, …? D. Besson et al., Phys. Rev. D68, 032002 (2003) B. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 242001 (2003) B. Aubert et al. (BaBarCollab.), Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 032007

  23. Ds0*(2317) Theoretical Predictions

  24. Method: Threshold Scan • reaction: • excitation function only depends on m and Γof Ds(2317) • experimental accuracy determined by beam quality (Δp, σp/p), not by detector resolution

  25. Simulation Results: Energy Scan Msum = Mmiss(Ds) + M(Ds) G = 100 keV

  26. Hadron Interactions: Double Strange Hypernuclei

  27. Production Mechanism and Detection Strategy

  28. Instrumentation

  29. The PANDA Collaboration 517 Members from 67 Institutes 18 Countries Australia, Austria, Belarus, China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Poland, Romania, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, The Netherlands, USA, UK

More Related