1 / 31

LDP 101: Closing the Upcoming Leadership Gap through Leadership Development Programming

LDP 101: Closing the Upcoming Leadership Gap through Leadership Development Programming. Megan Brogger, M.A. Katie Olson, M.A., L.P.P. John Fennig, Ph.D., L.P. DRI Consulting St. Paul, MN. Context. Federal Government 60% of all federal workers eligible to retire by 2016

quade
Télécharger la présentation

LDP 101: Closing the Upcoming Leadership Gap through Leadership Development Programming

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LDP 101:Closing the Upcoming Leadership Gap through Leadership Development Programming Megan Brogger, M.A. Katie Olson, M.A., L.P.P. John Fennig, Ph.D., L.P. DRI Consulting St. Paul, MN

  2. Context • Federal Government • 60% of all federal workers eligible to retire by 2016 • Includes 28% of all senior leaders • Significant leadership gap exists due to past hiring practices • Recruitment and retention • Private Sector • 50 – 75% of senior management eligible for retirement by 2010* • 97% report significant leadership gaps* • *Source: HayGroup

  3. Context • Over one-half of organizations have NO succession plan, knowledge transfer plan, replacement strategy • Existing plans often focus on technical KSAOs • Fewer focus directly on leadership KSAOS • Good news about the recession • Leadership programming is a proven and achievable approach to filling leadership gaps

  4. Goals • Provide information on best practices in leadership development programming • Describe successes and challenges in providing leadership programming in a federal government organization, the US Army Corps of Engineers

  5. The Client:United StatesArmy Corps of Engineers(USACE)

  6. USACE History • 1775 Continental Congress est. Corps of Engineers • First task: build Bunker Hill fortification • 1802 West Point founded - US Military Academy to prepare engineers for USACE

  7. USACE History • 1906 San Francisco earthquake • 1914 Panama Canal completion

  8. USACE History • 1942 Alaska Highway • 1884 Washington Monument

  9. USACE History • 1936 Flood Control Act • Recognized Corps as federal flood control agency • 1942 Manhattan Project • Construction of production facilities

  10. USACE History • 1936 Hoover Dam completed • 1945 – 1952 Reconstruction of Japan

  11. Who Is USACE? USACE Organization Distribution Civilian /Military HQ in DC: 799 /48 HQUSACE Division HQ: 861/26 SES Divisions (9) Districts (45) Districts: 27,757/259 Real Estate (33) MILCON (26) OCONUS (8) Civil Works (38) Civilians: Uniformed: 32,973 FTE 587 Authorized

  12. US Army Corps of Engineers • Since the early 1990s, “pockets” within USACE have offered LDPs • By 2000 about half (N = 20) of the USACE organizations had LDPs • In 2006, Engineering Requirement that all organizations within USACE would have 4-tiered LDPs • Since 2001, DRIC has consulted in >20 year-long LDPs in 7 USACE organizations

  13. Best Practices (BPs) in Leadership Development Programming

  14. Typical Scenario • Shortages at manager, senior manager, direc-tor, and senior leader levels (down 15 – 20%) • Impact of stimulus package • Need to develop leaders from employees hired on technical bases • LDPs seen as ways to • increase the pool of internal leadership candidates • reduce gaps in leadership skills • grow leaders more quickly

  15. The Handout • Strategy • Enablers • Design • Components • Content • Outcomes • Handout: • - Are we doing this? • Keep as is or • make changes?

  16. Best Practices - Strategic • Business strategy drives the goals, objectives, and content of the LDP • Organizational needs assessments provide LDP goals and outcomes • Needs assessments uncover the leadership competencies on which LDPs are based

  17. Best Practices - Strategic • LDPs are integrated into broader talent management/ workforce development effort Graphic: SHRM

  18. Best Practices - Enablers • Senior leaders voice and demonstrate genuine commitment ($$$) to the LDP • Participation is voluntary • Selection process is rigorous • Participants come from across the organization and a variety of disciplines

  19. Best Practices - Design • One size does not fit all; Customize • Formal program structure • Use a classroom format • Meet regularly • Establish a curriculum • Sessions are spaced, not massed • Formal program provides the structure upon which to hang other components

  20. Best Practices - Design • Use appropriate time spans appropriate to different types of KSAOs • Components are integrated, cohesive and internally consistent • Assure transfer of training; Require practice and reporting back; Avoid “one-shot,” stand- alone workshops

  21. Best Practices - Design • Transfer of Training via Action Learning • Prework • Training and in-session practice • Real world practice with on-the-job support • Reporting back on successes and challenges • Continued practice • Utilization assignments

  22. Best Practices - Components • Include both cohort & individual components • Assess individual leadership style and preference as baseline; Use results for developmental purposes only • 360 degree surveys, based on org’s leadership competencies are “the most useful element …” in LDPs • Especially when paired with Individual Action Plans

  23. Best Practices - Components • LDP Projects are Win-Win • Provide opportunities for action learning • Contribute to organizational outcomes • Use of External Coaches • Internal Formally-Structured Mentoring Program

  24. Best Practices - Components • Books and Readings • Facilitated Discussion of Case Studies • Rotational/Developmental Assignments • Structured Reflection – most useful and most disparaged

  25. Best Practices - Content • Content varies across organizations • Content should be driven by organizational needs assessment • Will increasingly include strategy, change, work-life balance, and developing others

  26. Best Practices - Content THEN • “Just in case” – broad, general approach • Focus on individual leadership • Transactional leadership NOW • “Just in time” – relates to current business environment • Focus on relationships and interactions • Transformational & authentic leadership

  27. Best Practices - Content • Relates to org needs & assessment/360 results • Includes Emotional Intelligence • Provides training on derailers and how to avoid them

  28. Best Practices - Outcomes • Disposition toward decisiveness and action • Effects = Whole person, not just the work person • Increased success of the organization in accomplishing its mission • Enhanced retention of employees

  29. Best Practices - METRICS • Vary between not having any and $ estimate • Most common are turnover, professional progress, career trajectory • Typically, Kirkpatrick’s Levels 1, 2, 3; not 4 • Many orgs are comfortable with informal and qualitative approaches

  30. Best Practices - METRICS • Require a long-term vision since dividends may not be realized for years. • Valid and reliable LDP outcome metrics are the wave of the future

  31. Questions?

More Related