1 / 19

Bridging capital and social cohesion in an English village

Bridging capital and social cohesion in an English village. Roy Greenhalgh 12 th November, 2008. Context. A small English village of 900 inhabitants. Has a primary school, Anglican church, independent chapel, pub, community run shop and post office and village hall, and village field.

quail-johns
Télécharger la présentation

Bridging capital and social cohesion in an English village

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Bridging capital and social cohesion in an English village Roy Greenhalgh 12th November, 2008

  2. Context • A small English village of 900 inhabitants. • Has a primary school, Anglican church, independent chapel, pub, community run shop and post office and village hall, and village field. • Has a growing retired population with few young families and transitory professionals. Turnover of houses approx 5 to 7% p.a. • Has full range of semi-skilled workers (quarry and farming) through to senior management in multimillion private sector and security sector. • Mix of housing with 80% private, estate and housing association

  3. Purpose of the study • A gradual change in age of population leads to change in interest in joining/membership of voluntary local associations; • Despite a low rate of influx of young families, involvement in voluntary village associations proves difficult; • Village has a thriving, successful community owned and run village shop/post office. • Surfaced question is:- • Can small communities or informal groups with high social cohesion positively affect others with low social cohesion? If so, how?

  4. Study design • A case study • group numbers < 35 per group, therefore traditional quantitative approach inappropriate; • Traditional sampling approaches inappropriate .. scale too small; • Diffusion is an individual process; • Need to maintain all the characteristics of each individual; • A suitable philosophical approach is primarily “relational”; • Analytical method is to use Network Analysis. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, Ca, Sage. Scott, J. (1991). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London, Sage. Brown, S. L. (2007). "The adoption and implementation of a service innovation in a social work setting - a case study of family group conferencing in the UK." Social Policy and Society6(3): 321-332.

  5. The broad issues • “Social cohesion is a state of affairs .... amongst members of society as characterised by a set of attitudes and norms that include trust, a sense of belonging and willingness to participate and help as well as their behavioural manifestations” (p.290); • Bridging capital is outward looking, requiring a wide network of less dense relationships with far fewer multiplex strands ; • Bridging and bonding capital’s strength can be measured in terms of weak to strong ties (Granovetter); • Theorised that an increase in cohesion is brought about by an increase in deployment of bridging capital. Chan, J., H.-P. To, et al. (2006). "Reconsidering Social Cohesion : Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research " Social Indicators Research75: 273–302. Granovetter, M. (1973). "The Strength of Weak Ties." American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360-1380.

  6. Method • Relational – “qualitative plus” • Qualitative – questionnaires with supplementary semi-structured interviews to verify and extend known knowledge. • 3 organisations • Village shop – 31 members; • WI committee – 6 members; • Parish Council – 6 members . Cross, R. and A. Parker (2004). The Hidden Power of Social Networks. Boston, Mass, Harvard Business School Press. Borgatti, S. (2007). "structure of SNA questionnaires." from http://www.insna.org/. Wasserman, S. and K. Faust (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

  7. Method (2) • Indicators • A measure of :- • the network in which subjects lived; • the reciprocity between subjects; • the trust between subjects; • the manner in which social norms operated between subjects; • how social agency appeared to work. Leonard, R. and J. Onyx (2003). "Networking Through Loose and Strong Ties: An Australian Qualitative Study." Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations14(2). Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, Ca, Sage.

  8. The Questionnaires

  9. Response matrix

  10. The distribution of ties at level “I know very well” between helpers and supervisors Density = 0.18, SD =0.38 At level 2,3 & 4, Density = 0.94 With SD = 0.244.

  11. Frequency of working together, 1, 2 or monthly

  12. Distribution of shop helpers/supervisors who are members of and office holders in other village organizations

  13. Findings - shop workers • Cohesion amongst the shop workers is high (d=0.94); • Correlation between “How often do you work with these helpers?” with a subset (reply value of 2) of “How well do you know these helpers?” (r=0.34, sig <0.001) indicates a situation where staff can continue to get to know each other; • High network connectivity facilitates easy flow of resources throughout the network; • Ratio of strong ties to all ties (0.18:0.94) is healthy and shows there is no potential “lock-out” of new members; • There is a wide spread of involvement in other village organisations. Wellman, B. (1979). "The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers." American Journal of Sociology 84(5 ): 1201-1231.

  14. Involvement of supervisors and helpers in other village organisations

  15. Findings – WI committee • Network values for the committee show high cohesion (d=0.99) and in-out degree at 1.0 for all officers; • High trust and high reciprocity exist, with good “obligation debtedness”; • High involvement in other village organisations, with equally high officer membership; • Local branch have regular group and national meetings with opportunities to bridge to out-of-village WI organisations; • Some committee members do “bridge” to non-WI organisations in and out of village. Coleman, J. S. (1988). "Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital." American Journal of Sociology94: 95-120.

  16. Conclusions • Successful bridging has been an individual social activity; • Bridging is risky; • Most bridgers are professional class in-comers; • Initial moves were to develop vulnerable weak-weak ties; • Some weak-weak ties have changed into stronger ties; • It is the learned professional skills that have been the basis for bridging skills.

  17. References (1) • (2003). "Ethical Guidelines." Retrieved 21 Sept. , 2007, from www.the-sra.org.uk. • Beauvais, C. and J. Jenson (2002). Social Cohesion: Updating the State of the Research. Ottawa, Canadian Policy Research Networks. • Beauvais, C. and J. Jenson (May 2002). Social Cohesion: Updating the State of the Research. Ottawa, Canadian Policy Research Networks. • Borgatti, S. (2007, 24 September 2007). "A question re your paper "Towards ethical guidelines for network research".” • Borgatti, S. (2007). "structure of SNA questionnaires." from http://www.insna.org/. • Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett, et al. (2002). UCInet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Vsn 6. Harvard, MA:, Analytic Technologies. • Bryman, A. and D. Cramer (1994). Quantitative Data Analysis for Social Scientists. London, Routledge. • Chan, J., H.-P. To, et al. (2006). "Reconsidering Social Cohesion : Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research " Social Indicators Research75: 273–302. • Churchill, E. F. and C. A. Halverson (2005). "Social Networks and Social Networking." IEEE Internet Computing September - October: 14-19. • Coleman, J. S. (1988). "Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital." American Journal of Sociology94: 95-120. • Cross, R. and A. Parker (2004). The Hidden Power of Social Networks. Boston, Mass, Harvard Business School Press. • Fent, T., P. Groeber, et al. (2007). "Coexistence of Social Norms based on In- and Out-group Interactions." ACS - Advances in Complex Systems10(2 ): 271-286.

  18. References (2) • Granovetter, M. (1973). "The Strength of Weak Ties." American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360-1380. • Granovetter, M. (1983). "The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited." Sociological Theory1: 201-233. • Hampton, K. and B. Wellman (2001). "Long Distance Community in the Network Society: Contact and Support Beyond Netville." American Behavioral Scientist 45: 476-495. • Jenson, J. (1998). Mapping Social Cohesion: The State of Canadian Research. Ottawa, Canadian Policy Research Networks. • Krackhardt, D. and M. Kilduff (2002). "Structure, culture and Simmelian ties in entrepreneurial firms." Social Networks 24 279–290. • Lauman, E. O., P. V. Marsden, et al. (1989). The Boundary Specification Problem in Network Analysis. Research Methods in Social Network Analysis. L. C. Freeman, D. R. White and A. K. Romney. Fairfax, Va., George Mason University. • Leonard, R. and J. Onyx (2003). "Networking Through Loose and Strong Ties: An Australian Qualitative Study." Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations14(2). • Onyx, J. and P. Bullen (2000). "Measuring social capital in five communities." The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science36(1): 23-42. • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone. New York, Simon & Schuster. • Rajulton, F., Z. R. Ravanera, et al. (2007). "Measuring Social Cohesion: An Experiment using the Canadian National Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating." Social Indicators Research80: 461-492.

  19. References (3) • Rousseau, D. M., S. B. Sitkin, et al. (1998). "Not too different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust." Academy of Management Review23(3): 393-404. • Scott, J. (1991). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London, Sage. • Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London, Sage. • Smith, A. and L. Sparks (2000). "The role and function of the independent small shop: the situation in Scotland." The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research10(2): 205-226. • Wallace, M. and A. Wray (2006). Critical reading and writing for postgraduates. London, Sage Publications. • Wasserman, S. and K. Faust (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. • Wellman, B. (1979). "The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers." American Journal of Sociology 84(5 ): 1201-1231. • Wellman, B. (1983). "Network Analysis: Some Basic Principles." Sociological Theory1: 155-200. • Williams, C. (2003). "Harnessing Social Capital: Some Lessons from Rural England." Local Government Studies29(1): 75-90. • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, Ca, Sage.

More Related