1 / 6

PMIPv6 Extension for Multicast draft-asaeda-multimob-pmip6-extension-06

81 st IETF, July 2011, Quebec City, Canada . PMIPv6 Extension for Multicast draft-asaeda-multimob-pmip6-extension-06. Hitoshi Asaeda Pierrick Seite Jinwei Xia. Protocol Extensions. Multicast traffic aggregation Set up bi-directional GRE tunnel ( M-Tunnel ) between LMA and MAG

quiana
Télécharger la présentation

PMIPv6 Extension for Multicast draft-asaeda-multimob-pmip6-extension-06

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 81st IETF, July 2011, Quebec City, Canada PMIPv6 Extension for Multicastdraft-asaeda-multimob-pmip6-extension-06 Hitoshi Asaeda Pierrick Seite Jinwei Xia

  2. Protocol Extensions • Multicast traffic aggregation • Set up bi-directional GRE tunnel (M-Tunnel) between LMA and MAG • M-tunnels are dedicated to multicast data and message transmission between LMA and MAG and shared by all MNs at the MAG • Mobility support (i.e. seamless handover) • Scenario 1: With Policy Profile • When MN’s subscribing channel list is always maintained • Scenario 2: With multicast extended PBU/PBA • Use DeReg PBU and PBA having multicast channel information (PBU-M/PBA-M) • Scenario 3: With other fast handover mechanism, e.g., multicast extended CXTP • draft-vonhugo-multimob-cxtp-extension-00 81st IETF, July 2011

  3. Background • Both LMA and MAG act as PIM-SM routers • Support both ASM and SSM • Incoming IF on LMA/MAG is selected by an RPF lookup algorithm given by PIM • No tunnel convergence problem • Support local routing • Friendly with source mobility • No multicast protocol changes 81st IETF, July 2011

  4. Changes from -05 • Simplify the scenario • No use case for MLD proxy • Split CXTP extension into Dirk’s draft • Instead, DeReg PBU is extended to notify subscribing multicast channel information • Adopt GRE for M-Tunnel • Distinguish unicast transmission over IPv6-IPv6 LMA-MAG tunnel (according to Sri’s comment) • GRE key is negotiated with RFC5845 or statically • Editorial changes 81st IETF, July 2011

  5. Multicast Packet Format in M-tunnel IPv6 header (src= LMAA, dst= Proxy-CoA) /* Outer Header */ GRE header /* Encapsulation Header */ IPv6 header (src= S, dst= G) /* Inner Header */ Upper layer protocols /* Packet Content */

  6. Conclusion • This draft provides the extension for PMIPv6 with PIM-SM • The way to move forward • Go ahead with this story? • Split into two drafts? • “PMIPv6 multicast support with PIM-SM and M-Tunnel” • Intended status: Informational or BCP or Proposed Standard • “(P)BU/(P)BA extension for multicast handover” • Intended status: Proposed Standard 81st IETF, July 2011 6

More Related