1 / 14

FARM LINK in Nebraska: Peer-to-Peer Conservation Buffer Extension That Works

FARM LINK in Nebraska: Peer-to-Peer Conservation Buffer Extension That Works. Scott J. Josiah, David Shelton, Rod Wilke and Tom Franti University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Factors Inhibiting Conservation Buffer Adoption. Lack of knowledge, confusion on gov’t programs

quilla
Télécharger la présentation

FARM LINK in Nebraska: Peer-to-Peer Conservation Buffer Extension That Works

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FARM LINK in Nebraska: Peer-to-Peer Conservation Buffer Extension That Works Scott J. Josiah, David Shelton, Rod Wilke and Tom Franti University of Nebraska-Lincoln

  2. Factors Inhibiting Conservation Buffer Adoption • Lack of knowledge, confusion on gov’t programs • Lack of knowledge of conservation practices needed on-farm • Current TT approaches not very effective • Reluctance to deal with government bureaucracy

  3. FARM LINK • Improves information delivery to landowners • Personal, “high touch” approach • One-on-one attention • On-farm • Capitalizes on peer pressure

  4. Program Design • Small watershed focus • Foster “buzz” for more rapid spread among residents • Agents are temporary contractors • January – March • Conduct “cold” calls, follow-up on-farm visits with aerial photos (minimum 2 hours/visit) • Minimum # of visits • On-farm visit ($30), $0.30/mile, & $100 bonus if producer signs FSA contract • Training in buffer benefits, design, government programs and “sales techniques”

  5. FARM LINK Agent Selection Criteria • Local, full-time producer without livestock • Has stream • Well-respected, recognized as producer & leader • Farm site indicates “progressiveness” • Believes in promoted technology, and in program • Strong conservation ethic • Active leadership in ag organizations • Motivated, positive, people-person, good communicator

  6. The Program Coordinator • Find & secure the “right” agents • Assists with training • Provides on-going supervision, monitoring • Monitors Agent productivity, solves problems • Processes intent forms, pay claims • Links project and government agencies • Sign up new producers, & encourage previous contacts to contract with NRCS/FSA

  7. The Farm Visit • Review producers conservation buffer (& other conservation) needs & opportunities • Use aerial photo to identify opportunities • Review government programs available to producer • If interested, producer signs intent form • Agent links producer to agency (NRCS/FSA)

  8. Program Impacts • 42 on-farm contacts, 28 (66%) signed intent forms • 11 contracts executed with NRCS/FSA • 66 acres of buffers to be installed • 26 additional on-farm contacts by Coordinator, 26 signed our intent form, 16 signed FSA intent forms • Sustainable capacity building: Creates local buffer “experts”– become “go-to” people post-project • Former Agents continue strong links to Extension & landowners

  9. More Program Impacts • Agent cost per project contact: $33 • Agent cost per executed FSA contract: $125 • Much more effective way to convey information – directly addresses government program confusion • “You have given more information to me in this visit than I have ever gotten leaning across the counter at the NRCS office”. A Shell Creek producer. • Refunded to continue in current area and expanded to new watershed • Provides opportunity to identify other needed conservation practices

  10. Program Inhibitors • County level NRCS employees often did not follow-up on FARM LINK contacts/intent forms • Overloaded with many other programs to administer • Concerned that on-farm visits could be construed as discriminatory to farmers not visited • Producers had to travel (several times) to FSA office to complete forms • Producers must know exactly what they want • No opportunity to ID other conservation practices • Several Farm Link agents did not work as expected • Difficult to find producers with desired Agent attributes

  11. Keys to Program Success • Choose the right agents • Provide adequate training • Provide close monitoring of Agent progress • Proactive – goes to the farmer, doesn’t wait for the producer to come to the office • Initial contact from neighbor, not agency • Promote awareness + adoption (not just awareness) • Via intent form • Emphasize commitment • High touch, personalized approach by respected neighbors • Structured to overcome reluctance to deal with government bureaucracy

  12. Future Challenges • Finding the right people • Improve agency processing of intent forms • Expand program over larger geographic areas • Expand program to cover a range of conservation practices

  13. Questions?

  14. Credits This project was made possible with funding from theUSDA-CSREES

More Related