1 / 1

Working Group Check-in Review findings of field assessment.

National Standard Assessment & Revisions Roadmap. Formulate Revisions Proposal Develop first draft of field parameters, definitions and timetable. This draft will be informed by consultations, as needed, with: - discipline/topical experts - other taxonomy models

quincy
Télécharger la présentation

Working Group Check-in Review findings of field assessment.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. National Standard Assessment & Revisions Roadmap Formulate Revisions Proposal • Develop first draft of field parameters, definitions and timetable. This draft will be informed by consultations, as needed, with: - discipline/topical experts - other taxonomy models - database providers (GMS vendors and CDP) • Working Group reviews and revises draft. Working Group Kick-Off • Review roles and responsibilities. • Compare notes on NEA/federal, state and regional info needs. • Determine topics to float on field survey. Assess Extant Information • Quality of data submitted by SAAs/RAOs. • Coding variations voluntarily adopted by the field. • Information most frequently used/requested. • Definitional and reporting questions received from SAAs/RAOs. • Feedback received during TA and training. SAA/RAO Field Assessment • Uses of the Standard. • Needs, desires and problems. • Issues, fields or codes identified by the Working Group. • Implementation factors. Test Revisions Proposal • Share revisions proposal and implementation timetable with SAAs/RAOs. • Share with database providers. • Revise as needed. Is there sufficient field support for proposed changes? If yes... Working Group Check-in • Review findings of field assessment. • What additional info should inform revisions priorities? NEA Consultation • Identify priority info needs and areas of concern. • Identify where continuity is key. APPROVAL • NEA (Senior Deputy Chairman) • NASAA Board of Directors Notify SAAs and RAOs Preparation of Implementation Support Materials For use in modifying application forms, grants database systems, e-grant protocols, FDR procedures, etc. Are further efforts to assess the Standard warranted? If yes... Determine Revisions Priorities • Identify data elements to be added, removed or changed. • Identify additional information/input needed to formulate a proposal. Outline Revisions Procedure • Identify key steps. • Identify resources needed. • Identify working group. Must include NEA, NASAA, SAA and RAO representation. Implementation Assistance • Distribution of materials. • Wide promotion of changes. • Training and TA. System Modifications NEA, NASAA, SAAs, RAOs begin adjusting guidelines, databases, etc.

More Related