1 / 12

• Major development of infrastructure safety • Major development of cost reduction

• Major development of infrastructure safety • Major development of cost reduction. - from 1 reduced annual fatality / 100 million EURO to 1 reduced annual fatality / 5 million EURO. 20:1 in cost effectiveness. Effectiveness from 20% to 90% in general.

quinlan-carver
Télécharger la présentation

• Major development of infrastructure safety • Major development of cost reduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. • Major development of infrastructure safety • Major development of cost reduction

  2. - from 1 reduced annual fatality / 100 million EURO to 1 reduced annual fatality / 5 million EURO 20:1 in cost effectiveness

  3. Effectiveness from 20% to 90% in general

  4. Injury prevention in a system´s approach - Concentrate on fatal/serious injuries instead of accidents • Use energy transfer as link between infrastructure, speed • vehicle safety and restraint use

  5. Two perspectives on infrastructure safety - The individual´s desire to drive on a safe road • The society´s role to protect as many as possible

  6. Infrastructure safety rating must isolate the role of infrastructure from other factors • Statistical figures cannotdo that • Road Protection Score might do that

  7. Road Protection Score is only relevant when: • The vehicle is safe • The use is safe (sober, restrained, no speeding) EURO-RAP must stress this

  8. A Higher Road Protection Score can be achived in two different ways • By modifying the infrastructure • or • By reducing speed limits • (or both) EURO-RAP must support both ways

  9. EURO-RAP should stimulate innovations - not guide design

  10. In general – Sweden (SNRA), positive to an infrastructure safety rating scheme • Objective • In a system´s approach • Rating qualities – not specific design

  11. EURO-RAP can: • Increase the public understanding of infrastructure safety • Increase the public understanding of vehicle safety, speed • and other relevant factors • Increase the understanding of system safety among traffic • engineering, automotive industry and political system

  12. The maximum speed where the vehicle can protect a restrained occupant is: • 70 km/h in a frontal impact • 50 km/h in a side impact - 30 km/h in a pedestrian impact • Anything beyond these speeds involves • infrastructure treatments

More Related