1 / 19

Handling Complex Decisions in the Development of New Drugs in Pharmaceutical Firms

Handling Complex Decisions in the Development of New Drugs in Pharmaceutical Firms. Cassimon, Engelen and Yordanov. FUR XII , LUISS, Roma , Italy, 22-26 June 2006. Valuation of pharma companies.

rafael
Télécharger la présentation

Handling Complex Decisions in the Development of New Drugs in Pharmaceutical Firms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Handling Complex Decisions in the Development of New Drugs in Pharmaceutical Firms Cassimon, Engelen and Yordanov FUR XII, LUISS, Roma, Italy, 22-26 June 2006

  2. Valuation of pharma companies • Financial analysts typically split the value of a pharmaceutical company in three building blocks: (i) existing marketed products; (ii) new products in the mid to late stage of development (phase II and III of the clinical testing); (iii) early R&D. Valuation is problematic with current models

  3. Real option characteristics of projects • Financial option: right (not an obligation) to buy or sell a certain asset at specific moments at a predetermined price • What are real options? • Recognizing the project itself or certain components as options • A project is an option, whereby the company obtains the right to all future FOCFs the project generates, in exchange for a predetermined price (investment cost of the project) • Different types of real options • Growth options, options to delay, etc.

  4. Real option approach to R&D • Benefits of real option approach compared to traditional models: • Can handle operational flexibility with respect to investment decisions • Abandonnement, delay or adjustment of projects, e.g. stop R&D of particular drug • Takes into account the strategic value of a project because of its interdependence with future projects • R&D give option to follow-up projects • Real option models are better suited to value R&D

  5. I large project FOCF success Follow-up project? Pilot project start t T failure Real option value (ROV) typical: NPV < 0 Typical example of a growth option Project’s value = NPV(pilot) + ROV (follow-up)  if >0, then invest

  6. Extending the growth option Growth option Extension to multiple growth options Sequential option Application to a ‘regulated’ sequential option Sequential drug development option

  7. Discovery (2-10 years) Preclinical Testing Laboratory and animal testing Clinical Phase I 20-80 healthy volunteers used to determine safety and dosage Clinical Phase II 100-300 patient volunteers used to look for efficacy and side effects Clinical Phase III 1000-5000 patient volunteers used to monitor adverse reactions to long-term use FDA Approval Additional Post- Marketing Testing The drug approval process years 3 7 10 14 0

  8. Opening the R&D black box

  9. fundamental research Development of a new drug commercialisation approval by government NPV1 success clinical test phase 3 clinical test phase 2 success failure NPV2 success clinical test phase 1 failure pre-clinical test phase success failure success failure success failure failure

  10. R&D on new drug as a chain of options (a)first option– decision to start preclinical phase; (b)second option– decision to start first clinical trial phase; (c)third option –decision to start second clinical trial phase; (d)fourth option– decision to start third clinical trial phase; (e) fifth option–decision to file for regulatory approval; (f) sixth option – decision to launch the new drug on the market.

  11. How to value this chain of real options? • Chain of real options in drug development can be seen as a case of compound option models • Geske (1979) – 2-fold compound option (option on an option) • R&D of new drug – 6-fold compound option • We use the extended n-fold compound option model of Cassimon et al. (2004) • Programmed in Matlab

  12. Case-study Xandee Biochemical, Ltd.

  13. INS-84 JR-32 FR-242 DIVE-4 MF-164 interim products Its research and product portfolio commerciali- zation preclinical clinical I clinical II clinical III FDA approval • MV of product portfolio is the sum of: • assets in place (interim products) • unexercised compound growth options (pipeline)

  14. Valuation of R&D and product portfolio

  15. Option ti Ki V n-fold COV Panel A – Product JR-32 ( = 0.81; wacc = 23%) – Preclinical phase 1 1.5 8.3 2 2.5 29.1 3 4 55.7 4 6.5 14.1 5 8 50.6 81.7 30.4 Panel B – Product INS-84 ( = 0.64; wacc = 18%) – Preclinical phase 1 3 15.8 2 4 48.5 3 6 96.4 4 8.5 25.3 5 10.5 107.2 72.7 15.6 Details of its drug development pipeline Legend: ti is the maturity date for the compound call option Ci (expressed in years), Ki is the exercise price for the compound call option Ci,; V is the current value of the underlying project;  is the instantaneous standard deviation of the project return; wacc is the risk-adjusted discount rate of the project and COV is the compound option value based on the corresponding n-fold compound option model. Ki,, V, I and COV in million USD.

  16. Panel C – Product FR-242 ( = 0.78; wacc = 21%) – Clinical I phase 1 0.5 10.2 2 2 33.7 3 5 8.3 4 6.75 60.0 65.8 19.4 Panel D – Product DIVE-4 ( =0.63; wacc = 18%) – Clinical III phase 1 2 8.5 2 3.5 29.4 61.1 33.4 Panel E – Product MF-164 ( = 0.46; wacc = 15%) – Approval phase 1 1 25.2 43.8 16.2 Details of its drug development pipeline Legend: ti is the maturity date for the compound call option Ci (expressed in years), Ki is the exercise price for the compound call option Ci,; V is the current value of the underlying project;  is the instantaneous standard deviation of the project return; wacc is the risk-adjusted discount rate of the project and COV is the compound option value based on the corresponding n-fold compound option model. Ki,, V, I and COV in million USD.

  17. Decomposition of its market value • 39% of its MV comes from early stage R&D • 86% of its MV comes from drug development pipeline • Only 14% of its MV comes from existing products

  18. Conclusions • Product portfolio of a pharmaceutical firm consists of exercised (assets in place) and unexercised (growth opportunity) real options • Real option component can be valued using generalised n-fold compound option models • Benefits: • possible to decompose MV of product portfolio in different components linked to specific phases of drug development process • Better insight in different value blocks of pharmaceutical firm (over the full range of phases of drug development)

  19. If you have … comments or suggestions, proposals for research collaboration, or proposals for consulting work, … please contact us at: p.engelen@econ.uu.nl Peter-Jan Engelen Utrecht University, Vredenburg 138 3511BG Utrecht, Netherlands Contact information

More Related