1 / 53

Secondary Indexing in Phoenix

Secondary Indexing in Phoenix. SF HBase User Group – September 26, 2013 . James Taylor Phoenix Lead Software Engineer. Jesse Yates HBase Committer Software Engineer. Agenda. https://www.madison.k12.wi.us/calendars. About Indexes In Phoenix Immutable Indexes Mutable Indexes Demo!

raheem
Télécharger la présentation

Secondary Indexing in Phoenix

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Secondary Indexing in Phoenix SF HBase User Group – September 26, 2013 James Taylor Phoenix Lead Software Engineer Jesse Yates HBase Committer Software Engineer

  2. Agenda https://www.madison.k12.wi.us/calendars About Indexes In Phoenix Immutable Indexes Mutable Indexes Demo! Roadmap SF HUG – Sept 2013

  3. Phoenix • Open Source • https://github.com/forcedotcom/phoenix • “SQL-skin” on HBase • Everyone knows SQL! • JDBC Driver • Plug-and-play • Faster than HBase • in some cases SF HUG – Sept 2013

  4. Secondary Indexes Sort on ‘orthogonal’ axis Save full-table scan Expected database feature Hard in HBase b/c of ACID considerations SF HUG – Sept 2013

  5. Agenda About Indexes In Phoenix Immutable Indexes Mutable Indexes Demo! Roadmap SF HUG – Sept 2013

  6. Indexes In Phoenix • Creating an index • DDL statement • Creates another HBase table behind the scenes • Deciding when an index is used • Transparent to the user • (but user can override through hint) • No stats yet • Knowing which table was used • EXPLAIN <query> SF HUG – Sept 2013

  7. Creating Indexes In Phoenix • CREATE INDEX <index_name> ON <table_name>(<columns_to_index>…) INCLUDE (<columns_to_cover>…); • Optionally add IMMUTABLE_ROWS=true property to CREATE TABLE statement SF HUG – Sept 2013

  8. Creating Indexes In Phoenix CREATE TABLE baby_names(     name VARCHAR PRIMARY KEY,     occurrences BIGINT); CREATE INDEX baby_names_idx ON baby_names(occurrences DESC, name); SF HUG – Sept 2013

  9. Deciding When To Use • Transparent to the user • Query optimizer does the following: • Compiles query against data and index tables • Chooses “best” one (not yet stats driven) • Can index even be used? • Active, Using columns contained in index (no join back to data table) • Can ORDER BY be removed? • Which plan forms the longest start/stop scan key? SF HUG – Sept 2013

  10. Deciding When To Use ORDER BY not necessary since rows in index table are already ordered this way SELECT name, occurrences FROM baby_names ORDER BY occurrences DESC LIMIT 10; SELECT name, occurrences FROM baby_names_idx LIMIT 10 SF HUG – Sept 2013

  11. Deciding When To Use Uses index, since we can form start row for scan based on filter of occurrences SELECT name, occurrences FROM baby_names WHERE occurrences > 100; SELECT name, occurrences FROM baby_names_idx WHERE occurrences > 100; SF HUG – Sept 2013

  12. Deciding When To Use Override optimizer by telling it not to use any indexes Tell optimizer priority in which it should consider using indexes` SELECT /* NO_INDEX */ name FROM baby_names WHERE occurrences > 100; SELECT /*+ INDEX (baby_names baby_names_idx other_baby_names_idx) */ name,occurrences FROM baby_names WHERE occurrences > 100; SF HUG – Sept 2013

  13. Knowing which table was used EXPLAINSELECT name, occurrences FROM baby_names ORDER BY occurrences DESC LIMIT 10; CLIENT PARALLEL 1-WAY FULL SCAN OVER BABY_NAMES_IDX SERVER FILTER BY PageFilter10 CLIENT 10 ROW LIMIT SF HUG – Sept 2013

  14. Agenda About Indexes In Phoenix Immutable Indexes Mutable Indexes Demo! Roadmap SF HUG – Sept 2013

  15. Immutable Indexes Immutable Rows Much easier to implement Client-managed Bulk-loadable SF HUG – Sept 2013

  16. Agenda About Indexes In Phoenix Immutable Indexes Mutable Indexes Demo! Roadmap SF HUG – Sept 2013

  17. Mutable Indexes • Global Index • Change row state • Common use-case • “expected” implementation • Covered Columns/Join Index SF HUG – Sept 2013

  18. 1.5 years* SF HUG – Sept 2013

  19. Internals • Index Management • Build index updates • Ensures index is ‘cleaned up’ • Recovery Mechanism • Ensures index updates are “ACID” SF HUG – Sept 2013

  20. “There is no magic” - Every programming hipster (chipster) SF HUG – Sept 2013

  21. Mutable Indexing: Standard Write Path Client HRegion RegionCoprocessorHost WAL RegionCoprocessorHost MemStore SF HUG – Sept 2013

  22. Mutable Indexing: Standard Write Path Client HRegion RegionCoprocessorHost WAL RegionCoprocessorHost MemStore SF HUG – Sept 2013

  23. Mutable Indexing Indexer Region Coprocessor Host Builder Codec WAL Updater WAL Durable! Index Table Indexer Region Coprocessor Host Index Table Index Table SF HUG – Sept 2013

  24. Index Management public interface IndexBuilder{ public void setup(RegionCoprocessorEnvironmentenv); public Map<Mutation, String> getIndexUpdate(Put put); public Map<Mutation, String> getIndexUpdate(Deletedelete); } Lives within a RegionCoprocesorObserver Access to the local HRegion Specifies the mutations to apply to the index tables SF HUG – Sept 2013

  25. Why not write my own? • Managing Cleanup • Efficient point-in-time correctness • Performance tricks • Abstract access to HRegion • Minimal network hops • Sorting correctness • Phoenix typing ensures correct index sorting SF HUG – Sept 2013

  26. Example: Managing Cleanup • Updates can arrive out of order • Client-managed timestamps SF HUG – Sept 2013

  27. Example: Managing Cleanup Index Table SF HUG – Sept 2013

  28. Example: Managing Cleanup SF HUG – Sept 2013

  29. Example: Managing Cleanup SF HUG – Sept 2013

  30. Example: Managing Cleanup SF HUG – Sept 2013

  31. Example: Managing Cleanup SF HUG – Sept 2013

  32. Managing Cleanup History “roll up” Out-of-order Updates Point-in-time correctness Multiple Timestamps per Mutation Delete vs. DeleteColumn vs. DeleteFamily Surprisingly hard! SF HUG – Sept 2013

  33. Phoenix Index Builder public interfaceIndexCodec{ public void initialize(RegionCoprocessorEnvironmentenv); public Iterable<IndexUpdate> getIndexDeletes(TableState state); public Iterable<IndexUpdate> getIndexUpserts(TableState state); } Much simpler than full index management Hides cleanup considerations Abstracted access to local state SF HUG – Sept 2013

  34. Phoenix Index Codec SF HUG – Sept 2013

  35. Dude, where’s my data? Ensuring Correctness SF HUG – Sept 2013

  36. HBase ACID • Does NOT give you: • Cross-row consistency • Cross-table consistency • Does give you: • Durable data on success • Visibility on success without partial rows SF HUG – Sept 2013

  37. Key Observation “Secondary indexing is inherently an easier problem than full transactions… secondary index updates are idempotent.” - Lars Hofhansl SF HUG – Sept 2013

  38. Idempotent Index Updates • Doesn’t need full transactions • Replay as many times as needed • Can tolerate a little lag • As long as we get the order right SF HUG – Sept 2013

  39. Failure Recovery • <property> • <name>hbase.regionserver.wal.codec</name> <value>o.a.h.hbase.regionserver.wal.IndexedWALEditCodec</value> • </property> • <property> • <name>hbase.regionserver.hlog.reader.impl</name> • <value>o.a.h.hbase.regionserver.wal.IndexedHLogReader</value> • </property> • Custom WALEditCodec • Encodes index updates • Supports compressed WAL • Custom WAL Reader • Replay index updates from WAL SF HUG – Sept 2013

  40. Failure Situations Any time before WAL, client replay Any time after WAL, HBase replay All-or-nothing SF HUG – Sept 2013

  41. Failure #1: Before WAL Client HRegion RegionCoprocessorHost WAL RegionCoprocessorHost MemStore SF HUG – Sept 2013

  42. Failure #1: Before WAL Client HRegion RegionCoprocessorHost WAL No problem! No data is stored in the WAL, client just retries entire update. RegionCoprocessorHost MemStore SF HUG – Sept 2013

  43. Failure #2: After WAL Client HRegion RegionCoprocessorHost WAL RegionCoprocessorHost MemStore SF HUG – Sept 2013

  44. Failure #2: After WAL Client HRegion RegionCoprocessorHost WAL WAL replayed via usual replay mechanisms RegionCoprocessorHost MemStore SF HUG – Sept 2013

  45. “Magic” Server-short circuit Lazy load columns Skip-scan for cache Parallel Writing Custom MemStore in Indexer Caching HTables Pluggable Index Writing/Failure Policy Minimize byte[] copy (ImmutableBytesPtr) SF HUG – Sept 2013

  46. Agenda About Indexes In Phoenix Immutable Indexes Mutable Indexes Demo! Roadmap SF HUG – Sept 2013

  47. Demo SF HUG – Sept 2013

  48. Agenda About Indexes In Phoenix Immutable Indexes Mutable Indexes Demo! Roadmap SF HUG – Sept 2013

  49. Roadmap Next release of Phoenix Performance improvements Functional Indexes Other indexing approaches (Huawei, SEP) SF HUG – Sept 2013

  50. Open Source! Main: https://github.com/forcedotcom/phoenix Indexing: https://github.com/forcedotcom/phoenix/tree/mutable-si SF HUG – Sept 2013

More Related