1 / 57

International Ocean Law

International Ocean Law. Jurisdiction Marine Pollution International Fishing. Why the Oceans Matter. 70% of the earth is covered in seas Food source Pollution assimilation – especially CO2 Shipping and transportation We know very little about the oceans. Jurisdiction.

rance
Télécharger la présentation

International Ocean Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. International Ocean Law Jurisdiction Marine Pollution International Fishing

  2. Why the Oceans Matter • 70% of the earth is covered in seas • Food source • Pollution assimilation – especially CO2 • Shipping and transportation • We know very little about the oceans

  3. Jurisdiction • Background principle • Freedom of the seas • Historically = free passage/ free fishing • “tragedy of the commons” • Customary limitation: territorial seas • 3 miles from coast • “cannon shot rule”

  4. Jurisdiction • Continental shelf • After World War II • United States asserted jurisdiction over natural resources and seabed of contiguous continental shelf • Other countries followed • Creeping jurisdiction + increasing disputes • UN Conference on the Law of the Sea 1958

  5. Jurisdiction • UNCLOS • United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea • 1982 signed • 1994 entered into force • (but many elements were already customary law by then!)

  6. Jurisdiction • UNCLOS – Jurisdiction • Ports • Territorial Seas • Contiguous Seas • Exclusive Economic Zones • High seas

  7. Jurisdiction

  8. Jurisdiction • UNCLOS – Jurisdiction • Ports = internal waters • Full national authority (with limited exceptions)

  9. Jurisdiction • UNCLOS – Jurisdiction • Territorial Seas = baseline to 12 nautical miles • Baseline = coast/harbor walls • Subject to dispute • Coastal state authority • = almost complete authority • Subject to right of innocent passage

  10. Jurisdiction • UNCLOS – Jurisdiction • Contiguous Seas = 12 to 24 nautical miles • “Limited” coastal authority • Except • Customs • Fiscal • Immigration • Sanitary legislation and regulations

  11. Jurisdiction • UNCLOS – Jurisdiction • Exclusive Economic Zones = 12-200 • Cover 30% of seas, 90% of commercial fisheries, and almost all minerals • Coastal states have sovereign right to explore, exploit, conserve and manage natural resources • May pass laws exercising these rights • May board, inspect and arrest crews on ships violating the laws

  12. Jurisdiction • UNCLOS – Jurisdiction • Exclusive Economic Zones = 12-200 • Coastal states shall ensure the conservation and utilization of their living marine resources • States shall take measures to prevent and reduce pollution • States shall avoid activities under their jurisdiction that cause damage to other States and their environments

  13. Jurisdiction • UNCLOS – Jurisdiction • Exclusive Economic Zones = 12-200 • But, in preventing pollution in their own jurisdiction, States shall avoid interfering with activities carried out by other States in their exercise of their rights

  14. Jurisdiction

  15. Jurisdiction • UNCLOS – Jurisdiction • Territorial v. EEZ jurisdiction – tension • Coastal state has regulatory jurisdiction over all sources of pollution in its territorial waters • In EEZ, pollution regulations must comport with generally accepted international standards – typically based on technical standards set by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) • Ship could be in compliance with IMO standards in EEZ, but violate State standards once in territorial waters

  16. Jurisdiction • UNCLOS – Jurisdiction • High seas – beyond 200 nautical miles • No national jurisdiction

  17. Jurisdiction • Innocent passage • All jurisdictional zones are subject to “innocent passage”= transit passage of vessels on the sea

  18. Jurisdiction • Innocent passage • Qualifications • Innocent passage does not protect • Any act of wilful and serious pollution in contravention of international law or • Any fishing activities • Coastal state may adopt laws limiting right in regard to conservation of living marine resources, preservation of environment, and control/reduction of pollution • But not based on design, construction, crew or equipment, unless based on international standards

  19. Jurisdiction • Coastal states v. flag states • Coastal states = countries with actual coastal territory • Have jurisdiction over ships when ships are in their territorial seas • Flag states = countries that license vessels to operate • Have jurisdiction over ships that fly their flags • Does not matter who owns the ship or what the nationality of the crew is – only relevant thing is the flag • May create problems if dealing with “flags of convenience”

  20. Oil Pollution

  21. Oil pollution • Oil pollution = most pervasive problem • 3,200 tankers per day • Huge: largest supertanker = 600,000 tons of oil • Line of fuel trucks 320 kilometers long

  22. Oil Pollution: The Notorious Spills Amoco Cadiz

  23. Oil Pollution: Operational Discharges If oil and ballast tanks are the same, emptying tanks will discharge oil – 0.4% of total cargo = 400 tons per voyage

  24. Oil Pollution: Operational Discharges

  25. Oil pollution impacts • Impacts vary depending on type of oil • Different chemical compounds • Natural seeps are different from refined oils • Bacteria eat oil from natural seeps • Location, species, depth, etc., all matter

  26. Oil Pollution Early Treaties • International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution of Sea by Oil (OILPOL) • First – no discharges within 50 miles of coast • Then – no discharges unless • Proceeding en route • Discharge = less than 1/15,000 of capacity • Rate = less than 60 liters per mile • Distance = more than 50 miles from land • Neither worked

  27. Oil Pollution Treaty: MARPOL 73/78 • Covers operational discharges, spills, and unintentional releases

  28. MARPOL 73/78 • General requirements • States will establish international rules and standards • “flag states” shall adopt laws for the prevention and reduction of pollution from vessels flying their flags • Coastal states may adopt regulations to prevent pollution • May apply them to vessels during innocent passage, so long as they don’t hinder innocent passage

  29. Oil pollution • MARPOL – 3 elements • Mandatory discharge standards • Construction, design, equipment, and manning specifications (CDEM) • Navigation standards

  30. MARPOL 73/78 • MARPOL – 3 elements • Mandatory discharge standards • = limits on discharges • Operating procedures for washing tanks and ballast water • Port States must provide reception facilities

  31. MARPOL 73/78 • MARPOL – 3 elements • Construction, design, equipment, and manning specifications (CDEM) • New ships must have segregated ballast tanks • Other requirements for filters • New ships need double hulls

  32. Design Standards: Example

  33. MARPOL 73/78 • MARPOL – 3 elements • Navigation standards in special areas • Special areas – oceanographical/ecological condition • Need special protection and standards • Examples: Mediterranean Sea, Baltic Sea, Black Sea, Red Sea, Gulf • No discharge allowed

  34. Does MARPOL 73/78 work?

  35. MARPOL 73/73 • MARPOL – Compliance • Specific tanker standards • Reporting and documentation requirements

  36. MARPOL 73/78 • MARPOL – Compliance • Specific tanker standards • Tankers > 150 tons • Ships > 400 tons • Must get International Oil Pollution Prevention (IOPP) Certificate – shows that ship meets technical standards • Surveys at least every 5 years + intermediate inspection • IOPPs issued by international classification societies • Not States • Is this good or bad?

  37. MARPOL 73/78 • MARPOL – Compliance • Specific tanker standards • If ship doesn’t meet applicable standards and ship owner/operator does not take corrective action, IOPP withdrawn and Port state notified

  38. MARPOL 73/78 • MARPOL – Compliance • Reporting and documentation requirements • Oil Record Book • Records every ballasting/discharge • Loading of oil • Transfer of oil • Etc.

  39. MARPOL 73/78 • MARPOL – Compliance • Certification societies • Private companies • Often have different standards • What risks? • Pseudo-IOPPs

  40. MARPOL 73/78 • MARPOL – Compliance • Oil book and self-reporting • What risks? • What opportunities?

  41. MARPOL 73/78 • MARPOL – Compliance • Oil book and self-reporting • What risks? • Would you report every time you drove over the speed limit? • What opportunities? • Passengers – garbage discharges • Crew – “magic pipes”

  42. MARPOL 73/78 – “Magic Pipe”

  43. Oil Pollution: Sources of Spills

  44. Oil pollution enforcement: flag states v. coastal states • Flag states • Vessel is part of a flag state’s territory or nationality • Flag states can enforce against flagged vessel’s violations • Except coastal state authority is more powerful in territorial seas

  45. Oil pollution enforcement: flag states v. coastal states • Coastal states • May use territorial authority to enforce against flagged vessels in their territorial seas, so long as they don’t infringe on innocent passage

  46. Oil pollution enforcement: flag states v. coastal states • Port states • Jurisdiction based on presence of vessel in port • Port v. Coastal: • Coastal state jurisdiction – if pollution occurs in coastal waters, state acts as coastal state • If the only connection is based on ship’s presence, then state acts as port state

  47. Oil pollution enforcement: MARPOL • IOPP certificates • Port state may inspect to verify a valid IOPP exists • Port state may detain ship until ship can proceed to sea without presenting unreasonable threat of harm to marine environment if • clear grounds for believing ship doesn’t conform to IOPP or that IOPP is not valid, • Clear grounds for believing master or crew is not familiar with procedures • If ship doesn’t have IOPP, ok to inspect

More Related