1 / 63

(Long baseline) Interferometric studies of multiple stars

(Long baseline) Interferometric studies of multiple stars. Overview. Stellar Interferometry and the ESO paradigm Advances in modeling Application to SB2s Challenges and rewards of multiple stars Using interferometry Interferometry with VLTI. Overview. Stellar Interferometry

ranit
Télécharger la présentation

(Long baseline) Interferometric studies of multiple stars

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. (Long baseline) Interferometric studies of multiple stars

  2. Overview • Stellar Interferometry and the ESO paradigm • Advances in modeling • Application to SB2s • Challenges and rewards of multiple stars • Using interferometry • Interferometry with VLTI

  3. Overview • Stellar Interferometry • Interferometers of the world and the ESO paradigm • What is an interferometer • Responses to simple models (direct problem) • Aperture synthesis and imaging • Visibility functions in the aperture plane • Advances in modeling • Application to SB2s • Challenges and rewards of multiple stars • Using interferometry • Interferometry with the VLTI

  4. Interferometers of the world VLTI Keck CHARA NPOI IOTA COAST SUSI GI2T PTI

  5. What is an interferometer? http://sim.jpl.nasa.gov/interferometry/Demo

  6. Definition of Complex Visibility V = (Pmax – Pmin ) / (Pmax + Pmin )

  7. Poly-chromatic fringes

  8. Stellar interferometer Van Cittert – Zernike Theorem The complex degree of coherence measured by an interferometer baseline is equal to a single spatial frequency of the Fourier transform of the object brightness distribution.

  9. Responses to simple models • Point source (“unresolved”) º constant • Uniform disk • Elliptical disk • Limb darkened disk • Binary (and higher multiples) • Gaussian = Gaussian

  10. Uniform disk

  11. Elliptical disk Transform (u,v) coord. Fourier transform strip brightness distribution van Belle et al. (2001)

  12. Limb darkened disk Wittkowski et al. (2003)

  13. Binary Mark III

  14. Aperture Synthesis Earth’s rotation changes a baselines orientation and projected length relative to the source. Thus, with a multi- element interferometer, an aperture much larger than that of a single telescope can be synthesized.

  15. Phase closure The atmosphere corrupts the visibility phase by adding random phase offsets above each aperture. The sum of the phase in a closed triangle of baselines is free of atmospheric effects and therefore equal to that of the object.

  16. Aperture plane visibility functions • Equal magnitude binary • Resolved component in binary • Faint secondary vs resolved primary • Triple star

  17. Visibility functions (1) Equal magnitude double star.

  18. Visibility functions (2) Wide equal magnitude double star with resolved component.

  19. Visibility functions (3) Wide double star with faint secondary and resolved primary.

  20. Visibility functions (4) Triple system, unresolved components.

  21. Overview • Stellar Interferometry and the ESO paradigm • Advances in modeling • Interferometric data • Combining spectroscopic and interferometric data • Application to SB2s • Challenges and rewards of multiple stars • Using interferometry • Interferometry with VLTI

  22. Fit of (ρ, θ)

  23. Atlas (Pleiades) Hipparcos distance: 118.3 +/- 3.5 pc From orbital parallax: 132 +/- 4 pc (ELODIE,CORALIE,FEROS + KOREL) Zwahlen et al. 2004 (MARK III, NPOI)

  24. b Centauri (B1III + B1III) M= 9.1 (14.4) Davis et al. 2005 (SUSI) Ausseloos et al. 2002

  25. Aperture synthesis and orbital motion Mark III single night obervation Motion of P=4d secondary in one night.

  26. Visibility fitting (Iota Peg: Boden et al. 1999)

  27. ο Leonis combined fitting Elements Physical parameters

  28. Fundamental stellar parameters (z Aurigae) Bennett et al. 1996

  29. Overview • Stellar Interferometry • Advances in modeling • Application to SB2s • Precision of masses • Orbital parallaxes • Footprints in the HR diagram • Challenges and rewards of multiple stars • Using interferometry • Interferometry with the VLTI

  30. Precision of masses

  31. Orbital Parallaxes

  32. Footprints in the HR diagram

  33. Overview • Stellar Interferometry • Advances in modeling • Application to SB2s • Challenges and rewards of multiple stars • Field of view issues • Hierarchical model • Orbit orientations • Using interferometry • Interferometry with the VLTI

  34. Interferometry of triple stars h Vir (Hummel et al. 2003)

  35. Orbital motion in h Virginis Images from NPOI data (Hummel et al. 2003)

  36. Orbits in h Virginis P = 4794 d P = 71 d

  37. Hierarchical Model Format Stellar parameters Orbital elements

  38. Reference orbits of Aa and Ab to B. M(Aa) / M(Ab) = 1.27 +/- 0.09 From spectroscopy: M(Aa) / M(Ab) = 1.33 +/- 0.02 Mass ratio from astrometry

  39. Stellar masses for h Virginis Aa-Ab is double lined: Obtain all three masses with spectroscopy. Determine relative orbit orientations by identifying ascending node

  40. h Virginis physical parameters

  41. Overview • Stellar Interferometry and the ESO paradigm • Advances in modeling • Double-lined spectroscopic binaries • Challenges and rewards of multiple stars • Using interferometry • Interferometers as telescopes • Interpretation of interferometric data (inverse problem) • Interferometry with VLTI

  42. Interferometers as telescopes • Photometric field of view • Interferometric field of view • Broadband aperture synthesis • Sparse sampling does not allow model independent imaging • Sensitivity: it’s the correlated flux! Courtesy of Tyler Nordgren

  43. Photometric field of view Mizar A (V=2.3) with B (V=4.0) at 14” (Mark III)

  44. Interferometric field of view 12 Persei observed on Oct 9, 2001 with the CHARA Array, K’-band, 330m baseline, separation 40 marcsec Mark 3 (Oct 8, 1992)

  45. Interferometric field of view b CrB (NPOI)

  46. Broadband aperture synthesis h Peg (NPOI) h Peg

  47. Overview • Stellar Interferometry and the ESO paradigm • Advanced modeling • Double-lined spectroscopic binaries • Challenges and rewards of multiple stars • Using interferometry • Interferometry with VLTI • Layout • Instrumentation

  48. Interferometry with the VLTI

  49. Existing VLTI instruments • VINCI: 2-channel (H & K) fiber 2-beam combiner • Commissioning only • MIDI: R=30-260 (8 – 13μ) 2-beam combiner • offered to astronomers first in P73 • AMBER: R= 35 – 14000, JHK, 3 telescope combiner • First offered for P76

  50. MIDIoverview MIDI Overview MIDI [D/F/NL; PI: Heidelberg] Paranal:November 2002 First Fringes with UTs:December 2002 Mid IR instrument (10–20 mm) , 2-beam, Spectral Resolution: 30-260 Limiting Magnitude N ~ 4 (1.0Jy, UT with tip/tilt, no fringe-tracker) (0.8 AT) N ~ 9 (10mJ, with fringe-tracker) (5.8 AT) Visibility Accuracy 1%-5% Airy Disk 0.26” (UT), 1.14” (AT) Diffraction Limit [200m] 0.01”

More Related