1 / 19

Number of eclipsing binaries vs. transiting planets: preparation of follow-up observations

Number of eclipsing binaries vs. transiting planets: preparation of follow-up observations. Tristan Guillot (OCA), Frédéric Pont, Maxime Marmier, Didier Queloz (Obs. Genève). & A. Garnier, F. Fressin, E. Matter, P. Mathias (OCA), M. Vannier (ESO), S. Aigrain (Cambridge),

rasul
Télécharger la présentation

Number of eclipsing binaries vs. transiting planets: preparation of follow-up observations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Number of eclipsing binaries vs. transiting planets:preparation of follow-up observations Tristan Guillot (OCA), Frédéric Pont, Maxime Marmier, Didier Queloz (Obs. Genève) & A. Garnier, F. Fressin, E. Matter, P. Mathias (OCA), M. Vannier (ESO), S. Aigrain (Cambridge), C. Moutou (LAM), M. Auvergne (LESIA)

  2. Motivations • Background eclipsing binaries (BEBs) represent a major source of confusion for planet detection • This is especially the case when looking for small planets (~10-3 luminosity drop) • We need numbers! • # of expected transiting planets • # of expected BEBs • Fraction of BEBs that can be discriminated directly from a lightcurve analysis (including the “color” information) • For the others, what are the observations that are most appropriate • We need test cases! • List of events (with all the stars in the mask) • Realistic lightcurves with instrument noise CoRoTWeek8

  3. # events towards the gal. center About 130 BeB 1 CCD only background eclipsing binaries target planets target binaries background planets CoRoTWeek8

  4. COROTlux: Principle Create a synthetic stellar field Add double, triple stars Add planetary companions Create COROT masks Determine contributions to each mask For each mask, calculate 150 days lightcurve including: -Eclipses & transits -Stellar variability -Photon & instrumental noises www.obs-nice.fr/guillot/corotlux CoRoTWeek8

  5. Ingredient 1: the stellar field • Presently: randomly generated • Magnitude counts based on the Besançon model (BM) and direct observations • Mass-radius-luminosity relations: • Previously used MS relations • Now based on fits from a corrected BM • Present calculations underestimate the crowding, overestimate the # of target stars / CCD • Giant stars are not included • Fields are much more homogeneous than in reality • Future improvements: • Direct use of the star list generated by the BM • Work in progress (E. Matar & P. Mathias) • Use real observations • (e.g. data from M. Deleuil, C. Moutou, H. Deeg) CoRoTWeek8

  6. Ingredient 2: binaries & ternaries • Presently: based on Duquennoy & Mayor (1991) • Distribution of orbits • Distribution of mass ratios • Are the # of BeBs sensitive to these hypotheses? • Yes! • Future improvements: • Test using the OGLE data • (Work by F. Pont) • After launch: Use COROT data to check the models CoRoTWeek8

  7. Ingredient 3: the planets • Mass-radius relations: • Quite uncertain: • Can be fitted to the presently known transiting planets • but depends on the presence of a core & its mass, & on tidal, atmospheric effects • This is an essential result to be obtained from COROT • Distributions of orbits & masses: • 1st possibility: • use known radial velocity surveys results • hence, consider only massive planets (Saturn mass) • 2nd possibility: • Known RV planets for large masses+ a large # of Uranus-sized planets (-Ara like) • Distribution of mass ratios • 3rd possibility: • Use theoretical predictions • e.g. Ida & Lin (2003) CoRoTWeek8

  8. Outcome: a list of events • What should be relatively accurate: • # of planets of the mass of Saturn and above • # of eclipsing binaries • What we don’t know: • # of small planets (below Saturn’s mass) • A list of events in the mask • Physical parameters to be included: • Position and shape of the mask in the CCD • For all stars with ∆m5 to 10: • their position in the mask (or outside) • their magnitude • their color • their binarity • Position within the mask • Needs to be combined to realistic instrumental noise • Test detection algorithms CoRoTWeek8

  9. Add stellar noises (Cambridge, Italy) List of expected events (BeBs, transits...) (OCA, Geneva/ESA...) Add instrumental noises (LAM, LESIA) List of lightcurves (LAM) Test detection algorithms (LAM, Geneva/ESA, Cambridge, DLR, IAS, IAC, OCA...) A possible pipeline for preparatory follow-up work Preparatory observations of COROT fields (LAM, IAC...) Distributions of radii, BeBs, planetary transits...etc from known surveys (Geneva/ESA, OCA...) Prepare follow-up observations (LAM, Geneva/ESA, Cambridge, DLR, IAS, IAC, OCA...) CoRoTWeek8

  10. Sub-giants Giants Super Earth

  11. Fiducial case for binary distribution + Ida-Lin planet distribution background eclipsing binaries target planets

  12. Pure gaussian binary distribution + RV planet distribution background eclipsing binaries target planets

More Related