1 / 15

Working Smarter, Not Harder with the Georgia Alternative Assessment

Working Smarter, Not Harder with the Georgia Alternative Assessment. January 2011. Norms. Please turn cell phones to silent/vibrate Only one person at a time talking Active participation Positive language Cooperative work. SCORING DIMENSIONS.

rebekkah
Télécharger la présentation

Working Smarter, Not Harder with the Georgia Alternative Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Working Smarter, Not Harderwith the Georgia Alternative Assessment January 2011

  2. Norms • Please turn cell phones to silent/vibrate • Only one person at a time talking • Active participation • Positive language • Cooperative work

  3. SCORING DIMENSIONS The GAA portfolio entries are scored for four discrete dimensions. A separate score is assigned for eachof three of the dimensions– • Fidelity to Standard, • Context, and • Achievement/ Progress • The fourth dimension, Generalization, is scored once across the entire portfolio.

  4. Scoring Rubric Review

  5. Fidelity to Standard assesses the degree to which the student’s work addresses the grade-level standard to which it is aligned. • Does the instructional activity demonstrate a clear connection to the standard and element? • Is the student work focused on academic content at a very introductory level considering the student’s grade level? • Is the student work focused on academic content at or approaching the student’s grade level? • Does the student work address all aspects of the element?

  6. Entry level Does not address Academic content At or approaching grade-level expectations A score of ‘1’ will receive an ‘Emerging’ rating. A score of ‘2’ could receive an ‘Established’ rating – if all other scores are ‘2’ or higher.

  7. Context assesses the degree to which the student work exhibits the use of grade-appropriate materials in a purposeful and natural/real-world application. • Are all the materials grade appropriate? • Is the instructional activity a purposeful means through which the student can learn and demonstrate what they know and can do? • Is the student working in a simulated (practice) situation? (Almost all classroom instruction is considered “simulated.”) • Is the student working in a real-world (following a list to purchase groceries) or natural situation(working in the general education classroom on the same activity as general education peers)?

  8. Not purposeful Purposeful Simulated application Purposeful Natural/real-world application

  9. Progress is Essential Evidence can show progress in a variety of ways: • an increase in accuracy; (2) an increase in the complexity of instructional tasks; and/or (3) an increase in independence through a decrease in the type and frequency of prompting.

  10. PROGRESS

  11. Is it clear to a total stranger looking at the evidence and entry sheet what the progress is?

  12. What is generalization? • Generalization assesses the student’s opportunity to apply the learned skill in other settings and/or with various individuals in addition to the teacher or paraprofessional. • In what meaningful settings is the student performing the activities? (The setting should be purposeful for the instructional task.) • With whom and in what way is the student interacting during the standard-based instructionalactivity?

  13. GENERALIZATION 0 1 2 3 Over entire portfolio

  14. Documenting Evidence • Use the same nouns & verbs that are in the standard and element in writing annotations and task descriptions • USE THE CHECKLISTS • Page 14 - 31

  15. Norms for Portfolio Review • Materials and discussions should be considered confidential • Comments, suggestions are made in a positive manner • Listen to comments/questions with an open mind

More Related