1 / 34

Modulation formats for digital fiber transmission

Eric Tell 050329 . Modulation formats for digital fiber transmission. Outline. Fiber performance limitations WDM Optical vs. radio communication Optical modulators Modulation formats Amplitude shift keying Duo-binary signalling Optical single sideband signalling

reegan
Télécharger la présentation

Modulation formats for digital fiber transmission

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Eric Tell 050329 Modulation formats for digital fiber transmission

  2. Outline • Fiber performance limitations • WDM • Optical vs. radio communication • Optical modulators • Modulation formats • Amplitude shift keying • Duo-binary signalling • Optical single sideband signalling • Simulation/experimental results • Summary

  3. Fiber performance limitations • Fiber Loss • Chromatic dispersion • different refractive index for different wavelengths • Fiber non-linearities

  4. Chromatic dispersion • Distance limit ~1/(bit rate)² • Example: Single mode fiber @1550nm • chromatic dispersion: 17ps/km-nm • dispersion limited distance: ~100km @10Gbit/s • comparable to loss limit • EDFA => increased loss-limited distance • Chromatic dispersion becomes the limiting factor in single mode long-haul fibers! • We want to decrease the bandwidth for a given datarate!

  5. Wave Division Multiplexing • Decreased channel spacing leads to interchannel interference and makes it difficult to compensate for fiber nonlinearities • Narrower subchannels would be nice...

  6. WDM (cont'd) • In a high capacity link the whole EDFA spectrum is filled with subchannels • The bandwidth of each subchannel is proportional to its bit rate • Total fiber capacity is given by the spectral efficency: (bitrate per channel)/(channel spacing)

  7. WDM (cont'd) • In a practical case using NRZ a spectral efficiency of 40% can be reached Power spectral density of NRZ

  8. WDM (cont'd • More GB/s per channel does not increase total bandwith, however • It results in fewer channels to manage • Increased channel spacing decreases some non-linear distortions • BUT to reach higher spectral efficiency a format with narrower spectrum for a given bandwidth is needed (while at the same time not increasing other impairments)

  9. How can this be achieved? • M-ary Amplitude Shift Keying (ASK) • Duo-binary signaling • Optical Single Sideband (OSSB)

  10. Comparison to radio systems • Much of the same theory can be applied, except • Carrier frequency is different • 1550 nm => 194 Thz • The available components are different • no coherent detection (no PLLs) • The channel is different

  11. Component imperfections • Modulators are nonlinear • difficult to achieve pure AM • PIN photo detectors responds to optical power rather than electrical field amplitude (“square envelope”) • Dispersion introduces a frequency dependent phase shift • “intensity-modulated” approaches are used

  12. Optical Modulators • Direct modulation • directly modulate the drive current of a semiconductor laser • Absorbtion modulation • Modulate the absorption spectrum of reverse-biased diod placed in front of the laser • Faster and more linear than direct modulation (60 GHz) • The Mach-Zender (MZ) modulator • modulation my adding phase shifted signals

  13. Optical modulators (cont'd) • Direct modulators and absorption modulators directly modulates the optical power, but will also generate phase modulation • The MZ modulator is more flexible and can generate different kinds if modulation other than NRZ/RZ/ASK

  14. The MZ modulator contacts V1(t) waveguide LiNbO3 Ein/2 Ein Eout γEin/2 V2(t)

  15. MZ modulator transfer function With γ=1 this can be rewritten as: Amplitude modulation Phasemodulation (chirp) With v1(t)=-v2(t) we remove the phase modulation and get:

  16. MZ modulator biasing “Normal bias”: “Bias at extinction”:

  17. MZ modulators - observations • These modulators are only linear in a small region • A problem for other than RZ/NRZ signaling • There must normally be an unmodulated carrier in order to use non-coherent detection

  18. M-ASK • Less bandwidth • More power needed for a given BER • non-linearities become limiting in long-haul DWDM systems • More complicated (analog and digital) electrical circuits • Possibly useful in multi-mode dispersion limited systems e.g. 10 Gbit/s Ethernet

  19. Duo-binary signaling • Introduce correlation between consecutive symbols • A special case of partial response signaling:

  20. Duo-binary signaling • Add consecutive symbols => three signal levels -1,1,1,-1 MZ modulator -2,0,2,0

  21. AM-PSK Duo-binary • Problem: Normally impractical to handle three levels • Solution: Use 0,E,-E • The detector will detect two levels 0 and E² • By precoding these two levels will correspond to 0 and 1 • a.k.a Amplitude Modulated Phase Shift Keying (AM-PSK) duo-binary signaling

  22. AM-PSK duo-binary system 0,0,1,0,1 1,-1,-1,1,1 map 1 xor 1,1,0,1,0 0,1,1,0,0 0,0,-2,0,2 Precoder MZ modulator biased at extinction 0,0,-E,0,E 0,0,E2,0,E2 |x|2 Photo detector (fiber)

  23. Optical Single Sideband (OSSB) • Observation: The frequency spectrum is symmetrical • Implication: Half of it can be filtered out to save bandwidth => Single Sideband Transmission! • Used e.g. in TV

  24. Subcarrier OSSB • In conventional subcarrier modulation the subcarrier appears on both sides of the optical carrier • Dispersion causes a phase shift between the two signals, which depends on the distance • At certain points the entire signal is canceled out!

  25. Subcarrier OSSB (cont'd) (decided to skip the equations: Optical fiber communications IVB, eq.16.30-16.36)

  26. Creating an SSB signal • Two ways • Use a filter (half the energy is lost) • Use the Hilbert transform • known as a Hartley modulator

  27. Hartley modulator SSB signal: Baseband signal:

  28. Optical SSB modulator “Approximation” of SSB signal: Hilbert transform a(t) â(t) Optical carrier OSSB signal MZ Amplitude modulator Phase modulator

  29. Simulation results: ASK/duo-binary Dispersion induced receiver sensitivity degradation for Gbit/s signalling

  30. More practical issues… • ASK • Nees more power => non-linearities limiting • Duo-binary • Needs extra filtering • Optical dispersion compensation could be an alternative • 225 km @10Gbit/s 1550 nm has been reached

  31. Experimental results: OSSB Experimental receiver sensitivity degradation vs. fiber length @ 10Gbit/s, BER=10-9

  32. DWDM • “Normal” NRZ • 40% spectral efficiency over 150 km • Duo-binary AM-PSK • 100% over 100 km • OSSB • 66% over 300 km

  33. Summary • Distance between repeaters is limited by either of • Fiber loss • Chromatic dispersion • Fiber non-linearities • With the advent of EDFA chromatic dispersion has become the limiting factor in long-haul systems

  34. Summary (cont’d) • We want to limit the bandwidth in order too • Reduce the effects of chromatic dispersion • Reach higher spectral efficiency in DWDM systems • Two potential methods: • Duo-binary signaling • Optical single sideband • Both methods could potentially halve the bandwidth • None of the methods are currently used in commercial systems, but there are some promising experimental results

More Related