1 / 71

Lean Operations

Lean Operations. Initiated by Japanese automaker Toyota. Adopted in USA by the aerospace industry in 1990’s Some turnaround times were lowered by 30-50%. Maintenance productivity improved by 25-50% Improved performance in all four dimensions in Plants and Supply Chains

remington-ronnie
Télécharger la présentation

Lean Operations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lean Operations • Initiated by Japanese automaker Toyota. Adopted in USA by the aerospace industry in 1990’s • Some turnaround times were lowered by 30-50%. Maintenance productivity improved by 25-50% • Improved performance in all four dimensions in Plants and Supply Chains • Plant: any singly owned, independently managed and operated facility (i.e., manufacturing site, service unit, storage warehouse) • Supply Chain: a network of interconnected facilities with diverse ownership, and flows of information and materials between the facilities (i.e., raw materials suppliers, finished goods producers, wholesalers, distributors, retailers)

  2. What is an Ideal Process? Synchronization + Efficiency Process Synchronization: The ability of the process to meet customer demand in terms of their quantity, time, quality and location requirements. • Exactly whatis needed (not wrong or defective products) • Exactly how much is needed (neither more or less) • Exactly when it is needed (not before or after) • Exactly where it is needed (not somewhere else) Process Efficiency: Measured in terms of the total processing costs. Less cost, more efficient!!. At the lowest cost

  3. The Process ideal: Synchronization & Efficiency • Just-In-Time (JIT) • When the four “just rights” come together— • Action is taken only when it becomes necessary!!! • In Manufacturing - production of only necessary flow units in necessary quantities at necessary times!!! • Synchronized Networks: • Outflow of one process is the inflow to another process!!!! • Requires precise matching of supply & demand • All stages are required to be tightly linked with flow of information and product • Ideally – the processing stages are achieved for lowest possible cost!!!!

  4. Waste and Its Sources • ANYTHING LESSTHAN IDEAL PERFORMANCE IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT!!! • Low Efficiency = High Processing Costs Defective products, high inventories, delays, stock outs Lack of Synchronization

  5. Buzz-words for managing and achieving efficiency within a plant • Other names connected to lean operations; JIT production, Zero inventory program, Synchronous manufacturing, Agile manufacturing, Toyota Production System (TPS)

  6. Waste and Its Sources Waste: producing inefficiently, producing wrong or defective products, producing in quantities that are too small/large, delivering early/late • Sources of Waste: • Producing defective products • Producing too much product • Carrying inventory • Waiting due to unbalanced workloads • Unnecessary processing • Unnecessary worker movement • Transporting materials

  7. Waste Reduction • Short term strategies: • Cycle & Safety inventories • Safety capacity • Non-Value adding activities (transportation, inspection, rework, process control) • Long term strategies: • Improve the overall processes • Build in flexibility, predictability, stability to eliminate temporary fixes. i.e., Reduce setup costs to make it more economical to produce small batches.

  8. The River Analogy • The boat can sail in shallow water (lean operations) if we are able to find ways to remove the imperfections on the river bottom!!! FG FM WIP Defects Defective Materials Long Setups Machine Breakdowns Long Lead Times Unsuitable Equipment Uneven Schedules Unreliable Suppliers Absenteeism Rigid Work Rules Inefficient Layouts

  9. Four Objectives of Lean Operations Improve process flows (Process Synchronization) • Efficient plant layout • Smooth flow of materials and information Increase process flexibility (Process Synchronization) • Low equipment changeover times • Cross-functional training Decrease process variability (Process Synchronization) • Flow rates • Processing times • Quality Minimize processing costs (Process efficiencies) • Eliminate non-value adding activities

  10. Efficiency/Synchronization for mass production:Henry Ford’s Rouge, Michigan plant • Totally integrated with – steel mill, glass factory, machine tools, electrical systems, assembly line, well-trained (well-paid) workers • Minimal time & cost • Everything in place except product variety!

  11. 10.4.1 Improving Process Architecture: Cellular Layouts • Process Architecture: the network of activities and resources • One method: • FUNCTIONAL LAYOUTS • Different product types follow different routings through the resource pools…enabling each flow unit to be sent to any available station in the pool.

  12. Output A B Product 1 Input C D Product 2 10.4.1 Review of Process Architectures: Job Shop Functional Layout: Resources that perform the same function are physically pooled together– JOB SHOPS

  13. 10.4.1 Improving Process Architecture: Cellular Layouts • Alternate to Process-based Functional Layout: CELLULAR LAYOUT All workstations that perform successive operations on a given product are grouped together to form a “CELL”

  14. 10.4.1 Improving Process Architecture: Cellular Layouts Product 1 A B C Input Output Example: Henry Ford’s Assembly Line for the Model T

  15. Facilitates synchronous flow of information and materials between processing stations Physical proximity of cells reduce transportation of flow units Moves small batches of flow units quickly Encourages teamwork & cross functional skill development Improved communication between stations Improves synchronization where each station produces parts only if the next station needs them Easier to recognize and report problems Quicker ability to correct defects Improving Process Architecture: Cellular Layouts + + ADVANTAGES

  16. Resources are dedicated to specific cells Resources cannot be used by other cells Lose advantage of resource pooling Worker incentives must be “team” oriented, not individual performance based REMEDIES: Use flexible resources that are cross functional Peer pressure to control productivity of team members 10.4.1 Improving Process Architecture: Cellular Layouts - - DISADVANTAGES

  17. Push Strategy • Push Production: Input availability triggers production where emphasis is on maximization of resource utilization (as long as there is work) • Planning Tool is Material Requirements Planning (MRP) • MRP: End-Product demand forecasts are “exploded” backwards to determine parts requirements at each station • PUSH works well if and only if • All information is accurate • Forecasts of finished goods are correct • There is no variability in processing times • Otherwise, it will disturb the planned flow, and destroy synchronization throughout the process!!

  18. Pull Strategy • Push Production: Where demand from a customer station triggers production. Each station produces only on demand from its customer station • The demand is actually “downstream” • PULL works well if and only if • There is a well-defined customer/supplier process. • The process can produce the quantity needed only when signaled to do so by its customer

  19. SUPPLY PUSH: Input availability triggers production Supplier Process Customer Inputs Outputs DEMAND PULL: Output need triggers production Supplier Process Customer Inputs Outputs Information Flow: Material Flow: 10.4.2 Improving Information & Material Flow: Demand Pull

  20. 10.4.2 Improving Information & Material Flow: Demand Pull • Demand Signaling: Customer needs a way to signal (inform) the supplier of its need. • Customer’s demand starts a chain reaction – • For withdrawals and replenishments of intermediate parts • EOQ-ROP system is a “Pull” system where ROP triggers production at the supplier and EOQ determines the quantity produced

  21. 10.4.2 Improving Information & Material Flow: Demand Pull • Synchronized Pull: When the delivery of parts are in sequence • [Suppliers must have greater ability and capability to achieve a synchronized pull effectively]

  22. 10.4.3 Improving Process Flexibility: Batch-Size Reduction • Each station must know HOW MUCH TO PRODUCE AT A TIME • Level Production: where small quantities are produced frequently to mach customer demand [i.e., if demand is 10000 sedans and 5000 SUVs, the production would call for producing 2 sedans and then 1 SUV, and then repeat the sequence] • Changeover Costs and Batch Reduction:Goal of level production is reduction of changeover costs (fixed setup or transportation costs of each batch) • I.E. In auto production expensive parts like seats are produced in batches of one, wipers in larger batches • Study the Changeover process to: use special tools to speed it up, customize some machines, keep some machines already set up. • Consider “small-batch” production

  23. 10.4.4 Quality at Source: Defect Prevention & Early Detection • Defective flow units increase average flow time and cost!!! • WHY? • It necessitates inspection and rework!!! • Anticipate and then Compensate for the problem: • Hold extra safety inventory in the buffer • This increases avg. flow time and cost • Plan and control Quality: • Prevent defects for occurring in the first place • Detect and correct them as soon as they appear

  24. 10.4.4 Quality at Source: Defect Prevention & Early Detection • Defect Prevention • Careful design of both product and process • Simplification & standardization • Mistake-proofing (poka yoke) • Parts are designed to halt automatically when defective units are fed into them (parts are designed to minimize chances of incorrect assembly) • Defect Visibility • Early detection/corrections more effective & economical

  25. 10.4.4 Quality at Source: Defect Prevention & Early Detection • Defect visibility (cont’d) • Early detection helps tracing to the source • Contribution to better synchronization and lower costs • Early detection requires constant vigilance and monitoring!! • Decentralized Control • Employees must be empowered with authority and the means to identify & correct problems at the local level

  26. 10.4.4 Quality at Source: Defect Prevention & Early Detection • Decentralized Control (cont’d) • In typical plants, line workers don’t feel the responsibility, motivation or security to point out problems. • BEST STRATEGIES OF LEAN OPERATIONS ARE: • Preventing problems through better planning • Highlighting problems as soon as they occur • Delegating problem solving to the local level

  27. 10.4.5 Reducing Processing Variability: Standardization of Work Maintenance, and Safety Capacity • Reduce Variability: • Standardize work at each stage and specify it clearly • Advantages to Standardization: • Reduces variability from changing personnel • Reduces variability from one production cycle to the next • Makes it easier to identify sources of waste that can be eliminated

  28. 10.4.5 Reducing Processing Variability: Standardization of Work Maintenance, and Safety Capacity • Lean Operations try to: • Minimize carrying safety inventory due to increased flow time • Maintain somesafety capacity as production against variability • These could be extra machines, workers, overtime • These forms of safety capacity should be flexible so that it can be used as needed!!

  29. 10.4.6 Visibility of Performance • A company needs to “see” (measure) process performance from the customer’s perspective • I.E. Time per call • Measure Percentage of Customers that had a problem resolved with one call • Actual performance (along with expectations) should be visible at each work cell • Not for punishment, but to provide quick feedback for corrective action

  30. 10.4.7 Managing Human Resources: Employee Involvement • SYNCHRONIZATION WITHIN A PLANT REQUIRES: • Cooperation • Contribution • Commitment Elton Mayo’s “Hawthorne Experiments” at Western Electric showed that: • Research has shown that workers involved in the decision-making process are better motivated and productive

  31. 10.4.7 Managing Human Resources: Employee Involvement In Companies with Lean Operations: • Workers are cross-trained to provide the company with flexible workers. • Workers are in work teams in cells and may perform certain managerial duties such as material ordering, hiring, scheduling • Great importance on recruiting and training of workers

  32. 10.4.8 Supplier Management: Partnerships • Outsourcing: Provides a flexible alternative to producing in-house • BUT- - - purchased materials account for a major portion of product cost and are a major source of quality problems!! • Lean approach: • Choose only a few capable suppliers • Cultivate cooperative, long-term relationships

  33. 10.4.8 Supplier Management: Partnerships • In Lean Operations: • Suppliers are an extension of the plant • Processing without inventories or quality inspection • Synchronization requires defect-free material • Frequent deliveries, small batches • Supplier’s process be able to produce small quantities on demand

  34. 10.4.8 Supplier Management: Partnerships • YOU ARE TREATING THE SUPPLIERS AS PARTNERS

  35. 10.4.1 – 10.4.8 SUMMARY • Lean Operations aim to sustain continuous flow processing in an economical manner: • Synchronize material and information flows • Increase flexibility • Reduce variability • Decrease processing costs

  36. Chapter 10 • Lean Operations: • Process Synchronization and Improvement • Questions??

  37. Operations Management: Lean Operations (JIT) Module • MBPF House Manufacturing Game • The transition to Lean Ops • The Paradigm of Lean Operations: The ideal • Methods for synchronization & waste reduction • Increasing visibility for continuous improvement • Approaching the ideal with Product Variety: TPS • Managing variety & flexibiltiy • Toyota Production System (TPS)

  38. Paradigm of Lean Operations: The Ideal Process • Synchronization of all flows • 1 x 1 • production on demand • defect free • At lowest possible cost • Waste = Gap between ideal and actual How do we set up a system to continually reduce waste ?

  39. Toyota’s waste elimination in Operations • 1. Overproduction • 2. Waiting • 3. Inessential handling • 4. Non-value adding processing • 5. Inventory in excess of immediate needs • 6. Inessential motion • 7. Correction necessitated by defects

  40. Batch Mfg (Lotsize = 5) Flow Mfg (Lotsize = 1) D C B 1 min/job 1 min/job 1 min/job 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 5 5 5 5 1 5 5 5 1 5 5 1 Synchronize to reduce waste: Cut Batch Sizes Example Process: A 1 min/job Space Space 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 A B C D A B C D 10 10 Time 15 15 20 20

  41. How to run Lean Operations: Managing Variety • Monthly Production Requirement: • How should production be scheduled for the month?

  42. FGI FGI time time Synchronize to reduce waste: HeijunkaMixed Level/Balanced Production • Batch Production Schedule Mixed Production Schedule • (AAAABBBB..) (ABAB...) • Product Apr/12.................15...........................30 Apr/12....................15.......................30 • A • B

  43. Synchronize to reduce waste: Reduced Setup Times • Can we shrink batch sizes with long setup/changeover times?

  44. PUSH: Inputs availability triggers execution Supplier Process Customer inputs outputs PULL: Outputs need triggers execution Supplier Process Customer inputs outputs Synchronize to reduce waste: customer demand pulls product

  45. Kanban Processing center i WIP Processing center i + 1 Implementation: Kanban Production Control Systems Job

  46. Synchronize to reduce waste:Quality at the Source

  47. Synchronize to reduce waste:Quality at the Source • Quality at source also improves time and throughput performance • Fool-proof/Fail-safe design (Poka-Yoke) • Inspection • Self • Automated (Jidoka) • Line-stopping empowerment (Andon) Human infrastructure

  48. Production Control P r o d u c t i o n P r o d u c t i o n P r o d u c t i o n C o n t r o l C o n t r o l C o n t r o l Roof Cut Base Cut R o o f R o o f R o o f B a s e B a s e B a s e C u t C u t C u t C u t C u t C u t Base Assy FA B a s e B a s e B a s e F A F A F A Production Control A s s y A s s y A s s y Production Control Roof Cut Base Cut Roof Cut Base Cut Q C Q C Q C Base Assy Base Assy FA FA Synchronize to reduce waste: From Functional Layout to Cells

  49. Synchronize to reduce waste: Just-In-Time operations • JIT= have exactly what is needed, in the quantity it is needed, when it is needed, where it is needed. • Reduce transfer batches • Level load production • Pull rather than push work • Quality at source • Set up cells

  50. Too Much Space Missed Due Dates Late Deliveries Too much paperwork Inventory Engineering Change Orders Scrap & Rework 100% inspection Long queues Poor Quality Machine Downtime Reducing waste: Increase Problem Visibility Lower the Water to Expose the Rocks

More Related