1 / 24

Taking Ethics Seriously

Taking Ethics Seriously. Ethical Relativism. Ethical Relativism. M oral truths are not absolutely true, but “true” relative to some particular standards. Ethical Relativism. M oral truths are not absolutely true, but “true” relative to some particular standards One’s culture.

rhale
Télécharger la présentation

Taking Ethics Seriously

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Taking Ethics Seriously

  2. Ethical Relativism

  3. Ethical Relativism • Moral truths are not absolutely true, but “true” relative to some particular standards

  4. Ethical Relativism • Moral truths are not absolutely true, but “true” relative to some particular standards • One’s culture

  5. Ethical Relativism • Moral truths are not absolutely true, but “true” relative to some particular standards • One’s culture • One’s personal opinion

  6. Ethical Relativism • Moral truths are not absolutely true, but “true” relative to some particular standards • One’s culture • Cultural relativism: Moral truths are not absolutely true but are relative to a particular society. • One’s personal opinion

  7. Ethical Relativism • Moral truths are not absolutely true, but “true” relative to some particular standards • One’s culture • Cultural relativism: Moral truths are not absolutely true but are relative to a particular society. • Whether an act is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of society and not on an absolute standard. • One’s personal opinion

  8. Ethical Relativism • Moral truths are not absolutely true, but “true” relative to some particular standards • One’s culture • Cultural relativism: Moral truths are not absolutely true but are relative to a particular society. • Whether an act is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of society and not on an absolute standard. • One’s personal opinion • Individual relativism: Moral truths are not absolute but relative to individuals.

  9. Ethical Relativism • Moral truths are not absolutely true, but “true” relative to some particular standards • One’s culture • Cultural relativism: Moral truths are not absolutely true but are relative to a particular society. • Whether an act is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of society and not on an absolute standard. • One’s personal opinion • Subjectivism:Moral truths are not absolute but relative to individuals. • Whether an act is right or wrong depends on the convictions of the person performing it and not on an absolute standard.

  10. Ethical Relativism • For some, a corollary to a more general relativism – there’s no “real world” at all, no “objective truth” about anything.

  11. Ethical Relativism • For some, a corollary to a more general relativism – there’s no “real world” at all, no “objective truth” about anything. • If there are no facts, then of course there aren’t moral facts

  12. NOTHING IS TRUE

  13. NOTHING IS TRUE Is that true?

  14. Ethical Relativism • For some, a corollary to a more general relativism – there’s no “real world” at all, no “objective truth” about anything. • For others, there may be facts, but just not moral facts. So, realism about the world but relativism about ethics.

  15. Ethical Relativism • For some, a corollary to a more general relativism – there’s no “real world” at all, no “objective truth” about anything. • For others, there may be facts, but just not moral facts. So, realism about the world but relativism about ethics. • Why?

  16. Some things are relative • “Manners” – these are different from one culture to another, and within one culture different over time

  17. Some things are relative • “Manners” – these are different from one culture to another, and within one culture different over time • Social coordination rules – e.g. traffic rules

  18. Some things are relative • “Manners” – these are different from one culture to another, and within one culture different over time • Social coordination rules – e.g. traffic rules • Pluralism of individual preferences

  19. Some things are relative • “Manners” – these are different from one culture to another, and within one culture different over time • Social coordination rules – e.g. traffic rules • Pluralism of individual preferences We really do want to understand these sorts of normative claims as relativistic

  20. Ethical relativism gets traction by inviting comparison between those normative claims which are best understood as relativistic and moral claims.

  21. Ethical relativism gets traction by inviting comparison between those normative claims which are best understood as relativistic and moral claims. Our question: Is this a warranted move?

  22. Ethical relativism gets traction by inviting comparison between those normative claims which are best understood as relativistic and moral claims. Our question: Is this a warranted move? So: let’s consider Richter’s four arguments against relativism

More Related