1 / 20

Optimization of Sensor Response Functions for Colorimetry of Reflective and Emissive Objects

Optimization of Sensor Response Functions for Colorimetry of Reflective and Emissive Objects. Mark Wolski*, Charles A. Bouman, Jan P. Allebach Purdue University, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, West Lafayette, IN 47907 Eric Walowit

rianne
Télécharger la présentation

Optimization of Sensor Response Functions for Colorimetry of Reflective and Emissive Objects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Optimization ofSensor Response Functionsfor Colorimetry ofReflective and Emissive Objects Mark Wolski*, Charles A. Bouman, Jan P. Allebach Purdue University, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, West Lafayette, IN 47907 Eric Walowit Color Savvy Systems Inc., Springboro, OH 45066 *now with General Motors Research and Development Center, Warren, MI 48090-9055.

  2. Overall Goal Design components (color filters) for an inexpensive device to perform colorimetric measurements from surfaces of different types

  3. Device Operation Highlights • Output: XYZ tristimulus values • 3 modes of operation Emissive Reflective/EE Reflective/D65 EE D65 n n n

  4. n 700 400 l Computation of Tristimulus Values • Stimulus Vector – n • Emissive Mode • Reflective Mode 31 samples taken at 10 nm intervals

  5. Tristimulus Vector • Tristimulus vector • Color matching matrix – Am (3x31) • Effective stimulus

  6. z x y l Color Matching Matrix 3x31 matrix of color matching functions

  7. Device Architecture Detectors LED’s LED’s Filters

  8. Computational Model Tm

  9. Estimate of Tristimulus Vector • Estimate • Channel matrix • emissive mode • reflective modes

  10. Error Metric • Tristimulus error • CIE uniform color space

  11. Error Metric (cont.) • Linearize about nominal tristimulus value t = t0 • Linearized error norm

  12. Error Metric (cont.) • Consider ensemble of 752 real stimuli nk • Rearrange and sum over k

  13. Regularization • Filter feasbility • Roughness cost • Design robustness • Effect of noise and/or component variations • Augment error metric

  14. Design Problem • Overall cost function • Solution procedure • For any fixed F =[f1, f2, f3, f4]T determine optimal coefficient matrices TEM, TEE, and TD65 as solution to least-squares problem • Minimize partially optimized cost via gradient search

  15. Experimental Results • Optimal filter set for Kr = 0.1 and Ks = 1.0

  16. Experimental Results (cont.) • Effect of system tolerance W on mean-squared error

  17. Experimental Results (cont.) • Error performance in true L*a*b* for set of 752 spectral samples

  18. Experimental Results (cont.) • Emissive mode L*a*b* error surface

  19. Approximation of Color Matching Matrix

  20. Conclusions • For given device architecture, it is possible to design components that will yield satisfactory performance • filters are quite smooth • device is robust to noise • excellent overall accuracy • Solution method is quite flexible • independent of size of sample ensemble • Vector space methods provide a powerful tool for solving problems in color imaging

More Related