1 / 41

Semantic Infrastructure Workshop Applications

Semantic Infrastructure Workshop Applications. Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services http://www.kapsgroup.com. Agenda. Search and Semantic Infrastructure Elements /Rich Dynamic Results Different Environments Design Issues

riona
Télécharger la présentation

Semantic Infrastructure Workshop Applications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Semantic Infrastructure Workshop Applications Tom ReamyChief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services http://www.kapsgroup.com

  2. Agenda • Search and Semantic Infrastructure • Elements /Rich Dynamic Results • Different Environments • Design Issues • Platform for Information Applications • Multiple Applications • Case Study – Categorization & Sentiment • Case Study – Taxonomy Development • Case Study – Expertise & Sentiment • Conclusions

  3. A Semantic Infrastructure Approach to Search:Elements • Multiple Knowledge Structures • Facet – orthogonal dimension of metadata • Taxonomy - Subject matter / aboutness • Ontology – Relationships / Facts • Subject – Verb - Object • Software - Search, ECM, auto-categorization, entity extraction, Text Analytics and Text Mining • People – tagging, evaluating tags, fine tune rules and taxonomy • People – Users, social tagging, suggestions • Rich Search Results – context and conversation

  4. A Semantic Infrastructure Approach to Search:Rich Results • Elements • Faceted Navigation • Categorization – metadata and/or dynamic • Tag Clouds – clustering • User Tags, personalization • Related topics – discovery • Supports all manner of search behaviors and needs • Find known items – zero in with facets • Discovery – Tags clouds, user tags, related topics • Deep dive - categorization

  5. A Semantic Infrastructure Approach to Search: Three Environments • E-Commerce • Catalogs, small uniform collections of entities • Conflict of information and Selling • Uniform behavior – buy this • Enterprise • More content, more types of content • Enterprise Tools – Search, ECM • Publishing Process – tagging, metadata standards • Internet • Wildly different amount and type of content, no taggers • General Purpose – Flickr, Yahoo • Vertical Portal – selected content, no taggers

  6. A Semantic Infrastructure Approach to Search: Enterprise Environment –Taxonomy, 7 facets • Taxonomy of Subjects / Disciplines: • Science > Marine Science > Marine microbiology > Marine toxins • Facets: • Organization > Division > Group • Clients > Federal > EPA • Instruments > Environmental Testing > Ocean Analysis > Vehicle • Facilities > Division > Location > Building X • Methods > Social > Population Study • Materials > Compounds > Chemicals • Content Type – Knowledge Asset > Proposals

  7. A Semantic Infrastructure Approach to Search: Internet Design • Subject Matter taxonomy – Business Topics • Finance > Currency > Exchange Rates • Facets • Location > Western World > United States • People – Alphabetical and/or Topical - Organization • Organization > Corporation > Car Manufacturing > Ford • Date – Absolute or range (1-1-01 to 1-1-08, last 30 days) • Publisher – Alphabetical and/or Topical – Organization • Content Type – list – newspapers, financial reports, etc.

  8. Rich Search ResultsDesign Issues - General • What is the right combination of elements? • Faceted navigation, metadata, browse, search, categorized search results, file plan • What is the right balance of elements? • Dominant dimension or equal facets • Browse topics and filter by facet • When to combine search, topics, and facets? • Search first and then filter by topics / facet • Browse/facet front end with a search box

  9. Rich Search ResultsDesign Issues - General • Homogeneity of Audience and Content • Model of the Domain – broad • How many facets do you need? • More facets and let users decide • Allow for customization – can’t define a single set • User Analysis – tasks, labeling, communities • Issue – labels that people use to describe their business and label that they use to find information • Match the structure to domain and task • Users can understand different structures

  10. Rich Search ResultsAutomatic Facets – Special Issues • Scale requires more automated solutions • More sophisticated rules • Rules to find and populate existing metadata • Variety of types of existing metadata – Publisher, title, date • Multiple implementation Standards – Last Name, First / First Name, Last • Issue of disambiguation: • Same person, different name – Henry Ford, Mr. Ford, Henry X. Ford • Same word, different entity – Ford and Ford • Number of entities and thresholds per results set / document • Usability, audience needs • Relevance Ranking – number of entities, rank of facets

  11. Semantic Infrastructure for Search Based AppsMultiple Applications • Platform for Information Applications • Content Aggregation • Duplicate Documents – save millions! • Text Mining – BI, CI – sentiment analysis • Combine with Data Mining – disease symptoms, new • Social – Hybrid folksonomy / taxonomy / auto-metadata • Social – expertise, categorize tweets and blogs, reputation • Ontology – travel assistant – SIRI • Use your Imagination!

  12. Semantic Infrastructure for Search AppsMultiple Applications • SIRI – Travel Assistant

  13. Semantic Infrastructure for Search Apps Case Study – Categorization & Sentiment • Call Motivation • Categorization – Motivation Taxonomy • Purpose of previous calls to understand current call • Issues of scale, small size of documents, jargon, spelling • Customer Sentiment • Telecom Forums • Feature level – not just products • Issue of context - sarcasm, jargon • Knowledge Base • Categorization, Product extraction, expertise-sentiment analysis • Social Media as source for solutions

  14. Case Study – Categorization & Sentiment

  15. Case Study – Categorization & Sentiment

  16. Case Study – Categorization & Sentiment

  17. Case Study – Categorization & Sentiment

  18. Semantic Infrastructure for Search Apps Case Study – Taxonomy Development Problem – 200,000 new uncategorized documents Old taxonomy –need one that reflects change in corpus Text mining, entity extraction, categorization Content – 250,000 large documents, search logs, etc. Bottom Up- terms in documents – frequency, date, Clustering – suggested categories Clustering – chunking for editors Entity Extraction – people, organizations, Programming languages Time savings – only feasible way to scan documents Quality – important terms, co-occurring terms

  19. Case Study – Taxonomy Development

  20. Case Study – Taxonomy Development

  21. Case Study – Taxonomy Development

  22. Semantic Infrastructure ApplicationsExpertise Analysis • Sentiment Analysis to Expertise Analysis(KnowHow) • Know How, skills, “tacit” knowledge • No single correct categorization • Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things • Types of Animals • Those that belong to the Emperor • Embalmed Ones • Suckling Pigs • Fabulous Ones • Those that are included in this classification • Those that tremble as if they were mad • Other

  23. Semantic Infrastructure ApplicationsExpertise Analysis – Basic Level Categories • Mid-level in a taxonomy / hierarchy • Short and easy words • Maximum distinctness and expressiveness • First level named and understood by children • Level at which most of our knowledge is organized • Levels: Superordinate – Basic – Subordinate • Mammal – Dog – Golden Retriever • Furniture – chair – kitchen chair

  24. Semantic Infrastructure ApplicationsExpertise Analysis • Experts prefer lower, subordinate levels • In their domain, (almost) never used superordinate • Novice prefer higher, superordinate levels • General Populace prefers basic level • Not just individuals but whole societies / communities differ in their preferred levels • Issue – artificial languages – ex. Science discipline • Issue – difference of child and adult learning – adults start with high level

  25. Semantic Infrastructure ApplicationsExpertise Analysis • What is basic level is context(s) dependent • Document/author expert in news health care, not research • Hybrid – simple high level taxonomy (superordinate), short words – basic, longer words – expert Plus • Develop expertise rules – similar to categorization rules • Use basic level for subject • Superordinate for general, subordinate for expert • Also contextual rules • “Tests” is general, high level • “Predictive value of tests” is lower, more expert • If terms appear in same sentence - expert

  26. Education Terms

  27. Healthcare Terms

  28. Semantic Infrastructure ApplicationsExpertise Analysis – application areas • Taxonomy/ Ontology development /design – use basic level • User contribution • Card sorting – non-experts use superficial similarities • Survey for attributes instead of cart sorting, general structure • Develop expert and general versions/sections/synonyms • Info presentation – combine superordinate and basic • Similar to scientific – Genus – Species is official name • Text Mining • Expertise characterization of writer

  29. Semantic Infrastructure ApplicationsExpertise Analysis – application areas • Business & Customer intelligence • General – characterize people’s expertise to add to evaluation of their comments • Combine with sentiment analysis – finer evaluation – what are experts saying, what are novices saying • Deeper research into communities, customers • Enterprise Content Management • At publish time, software automatically gives an expertise level – present to author for validation • Combine with categorization – offer tags that are suitable level of expertise

  30. Semantic Infrastructure ApplicationsExpertise Analysis – application areas • Social Media - Community of Practice • Characterize the level of expertise in the community • Evaluate other communities expertise level • Personalize information presentation by expertise • Expertise location • Generate automatic expertise characterization based on authored documents • Expertise of people in a social network • Terrorists and bomb-making

  31. Semantic Infrastructure ApplicationsExpertise Analysis – application areas- CoP • Basic Level • Blog • Software (Design) • Web (Design) • Linux • Javascript • Web2.0 • Google • Css • Flash • Superordinate • Music • Photography • News • Education • Business • Technology • Politics • Science • Culture

  32. Semantic Infrastructure ApplicationsExpertise Analysis – application areas-Tags • CSS • Web Design • Design • Css3 • Tutorial • Webdev • Javascript • Web • Development • Html • Jquery • html5 • Education • Technology • Resources • Teaching • Learning • Science • Web20 • Games • Interactive • Research • Tools • reference

  33. Semantic Infrastructure Approach to SearchConclusions • Semantic Infrastructure solution (people, policy, technology, semantics) and feedback is best approach • Foundation – Hybrid ECM model with text analytics, Search • Integrated Search design is essential – rich results • Subject, facets, tag clouds, etc. • Semantic Infrastructure as a platform for multiple applications • Build on infrastructure for economy and quality • Text Analytics (Entity extraction and auto-categorization) are essential • Future – new kinds of applications: • Text Mining and Data mining, research tools, sentiment • Beyond Sentiment – expertise applications • NeuroAnalytics – cognitive science meets search and more • Watson is just the start

  34. Questions? Tom Reamytomr@kapsgroup.com KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services http://www.kapsgroup.com

  35. Resources • Books • Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things • George Lakoff • Knowledge, Concepts, and Categories • Koen Lamberts and David Shanks • Web Sites • Text Analytics News - http://social.textanalyticsnews.com/index.php • Text Analytics Wiki - http://textanalytics.wikidot.com/

  36. Resources • Blogs • SAS- http://blogs.sas.com/text-mining/ • Web Sites • Taxonomy Community of Practice: http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/ • LindedIn – Text Analytics Summit Group • http://www.LinkedIn.com • Whitepaper – CM and Text Analytics - http://www.textanalyticsnews.com/usa/contentmanagementmeetstextanalytics.pdf • Whitepaper – Enterprise Content Categorization strategy and development – http://www.kapsgroup.com

  37. Resources • Articles • Malt, B. C. 1995. Category coherence in cross-cultural perspective. Cognitive Psychology 29, 85-148 • Rifkin, A. 1985. Evidence for a basic level in event taxonomies. Memory & Cognition 13, 538-56 • Shaver, P., J. Schwarz, D. Kirson, D. O’Conner 1987. Emotion Knowledge: further explorations of prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52, 1061-1086 • Tanaka, J. W. & M. E. Taylor 1991. Object categories and expertise: is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive Psychology 23, 457-82

More Related