1 / 25

Prospects for Mechatronics Graduates? How do we improve them?

Prospects for Mechatronics Graduates? How do we improve them?. James Trevelyan November 2009. Acknowledgements. Sabbia Tilli – co-researcher Private companies sponsoring research Students. Engineering Graduates in Australia 2006. Occupations of those employed.

rock
Télécharger la présentation

Prospects for Mechatronics Graduates? How do we improve them?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Prospects for Mechatronics Graduates? How do we improve them? James Trevelyan November 2009

  2. Acknowledgements • Sabbia Tilli – co-researcher • Private companies sponsoring research • Students

  3. Engineering Graduates in Australia 2006

  4. Occupations of those employed

  5. Engineering Education in Australia

  6. Growing up in Australia

  7. Conclusions of this and related work • We have a plentiful reservoir of ‘other’-employed engineering graduates. • Engineering employment eludes the majority. • Canada and some other countries retain more graduates in engineering. • Cultural background seems to determine engineering and related management employment. • Engineering education in Australia makes no difference to prospects for migrants (compared to education at home)!

  8. Questions • Why do we see these results? • Why is (was) there a skills shortage? • Longitudinal Study of Engineering Graduates

  9. What do engineers really do? To Engineer is Human* but… novice V * Petroski, H. (1985). To Engineer is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design. New York, St Martin's Press.

  10. Motivation • Concerns at education misalignment? • What do engineers do? • Transition to practice? • Where are our engineers?

  11. Significance • help us understand what training is effective • make the transition easier • explain the relevance of coursework to students • improve curriculum design • explain attrition loss to other occupations?

  12. Aims of Study • What do novices do? • What training do they receive? • What do they learn by other means? • Perceived deficiencies in undergraduate education. • Career trajectories. • Engineering education continues after graduation….. even in the workplace

  13. Method • 204 participants (participation rate 67% steady after 2.5 years), all disciplines • 3 –4 surveys each year • Electronic surveys (& some interviews) • Qualitative and quantitative questions

  14. Aspects of Engineering Practice • Coordinationtelephone calls, visits, supervision, meetings, site engineering, monitoring, advocacy, procedures, team work, networking, mentoring • Engineering Processmanagement systems, project management, change management, configuration control, documentation management, maintenance management, operations management, inventory & logistics • Design, Review, Testdesign, detailing, review, check compliance with standards, research, component knowledge, testing, commissioning

  15. Working Hours • Average paid hours/week: 42 • Average unpaid o’time/week: 8 • Highest total 88, • 10% > 60hrs, 7% < 40 hrs

  16. Time Perception Surveys

  17. Working Time Allocation(% of time, sorted by average time)

  18. Working Time Allocation(% of time, sorted by category)

  19. Main Results • 60% of time spent on human interaction • Approx half in real time (face to face, phone) • Approx half through documents, messages • Approx half represents informal technical coordination, e.g. seeking information from others, getting work done, delivering results on time, detecting and correcting misunderstandings etc. • 9% of time spent working with hardware • Rest is desk work or meetings • 4% average on design & coding (mechatronics 8%) • 3-18% on calculation & modelling (EE 3%, Petroleum highest)

  20. Some mechatronic graduates in the study

  21. More graduates (total 120 being followed)

  22. Conclusions So Far • Diversity • Consistency (averages) • Insufficient learning opportunities • Nearly all GDPs could be greatly improved • Awareness gaps? GDP = Graduate Development Programme

  23. Recent Developments • Course experience results for engineering are uniformly poor across Australia • Mismatch in expectations of graduates • Communication skill requirements are grossly misunderstood • Australian engineering projects are failing because of poor communication skills • Recent education research shows ways to significantly improve teaching effectiveness in technical fundamentals, improving professional skills at the same time.

  24. Recent Feedback • Novice engineers don’t seem to understand how to create value for clients • Employers are worried but find it difficult to articulate their concerns • Key mechatronics stakeholders are concerned at graduate abilities, particularly in technical abilities • Team projects are reinforcing bad behaviour patterns

  25. What do you need to do? • Start learning about teaching methods known to improve results: • Cooperative learning • Peer instruction • Variation theory • Link development of teaching skill to performance evaluation • Focus on effective learning of technical fundamentals • Threshold concepts – useful tool • Study what your graduates are actually doing. • Teach them effective listening and coordination skills.

More Related