1 / 10

NSIS Meeting

NSIS Meeting. Dallas, TX IETF65 John Loughney. 0900-1130 Morning Session. WG Status update – 5 minutes GIST update - 5 minutes QoS work update - 30 minutes QoS NSLP QSPEC Y.1541 QOSM RMD QOSM Controlled Load QOSM NATFW work update - 15 minutes Mobility discussion - 15 minutes

roman
Télécharger la présentation

NSIS Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NSIS Meeting • Dallas, TX IETF65 • John Loughney

  2. 0900-1130 Morning Session • WG Status update – 5 minutes • GIST update - 5 minutes • QoS work update - 30 minutes • QoS NSLP • QSPEC • Y.1541 QOSM • RMD QOSM • Controlled Load QOSM • NATFW work update - 15 minutes • Mobility discussion - 15 minutes • IANA Considerations discussion - 15 minutes • Mini off-path bof - 1 hour • HyPath –Luís Cordeiro • Partly-Decoupled Signalling in NSIS – Robert Hancock • New MRMs –Martin Stiemerling

  3. 1510-1610 Afternoon Session II • New Work discussion • Metering NSLP update • NSIS Operation Over IP Tunnels • GIST/SCTP • NAT Traversal for GIST • Interdomain QoS Model • Diagnostics NSLP

  4. WG Status Update • GIST will be sent to the Transport AD, after he returns from vacation. • QoS NSLP completed WGLC, needs more discussion & a revision. • QSPEC, Y.1541 &RMD completed WGLC with minimal review, need more review before we can progress

  5. Milestone update • Done Submit 'Signaling Requirements' to IESG for publication as an Informational RFC. • Done Submit 'Next Steps in Signaling: Framework' to IESG for publication as Info. • Done Submit 'Analysis of Existing Signaling Protocols' to IESG as Informational RFC • Done Submit 'RSVP Security Properties' to IESG as Informational RFC • Done Submit 'NSIS Threats' to IESG as Informational RFC • Done Submit 'NSIS Transport Protocol' to IESG for publication for Proposed Standard • May 2005 Submit 'NSIS QoS Application Protocol' to IESG for publication for Proposed Standard • May 2005 Submit 'NSIS QoS Specification Template' to IESG for publication as an Informational RFC • Jun 2005 Submit 'NSIS Middle Box Signaling Application Protocol' to IESG for publication for Proposed Standard • Sep 2005 Submit 'Applicability Statement of NSIS Protocols in Mobile Environments' to the IESG as an Informational RFC • Sep 2005 Submit 'Differentiated Service Signaling on the Internet' to the IESG for publication as an Informational RFC

  6. New Milestones • May 2006 Submit 'NSIS QoS Application Protocol' to IESG for publication for Proposed Standard • May 2006 Submit 'NSIS QoS Specification Template' to IESG for publication as an Informational RFC • May 2006 Submit 'NSIS NAT/FW Signaling Application Protocol' to IESG for publication for Proposed Standard • May 2006 Submit ‘RMD QoSM' to the IESG for publication as an Informational RFC • May 2006 Submit ‘Y.1541 QoSM' to the IESG for publication as an Info. RFC • Sept 2006 Submit 'Applicability Statement of NSIS Protocols in Mobile Environments' to the IESG as an Informational RFC • Plus whatever else we decide.

  7. NSIS Extensibility • draft-loughney-nsis-ext-02.txt • IETF 65

  8. Open Issues • Needs more text • Discussion of common object space • Discussion of new NSLP features • NSLP versioning • QoS Model interaction, at a high-level • Other stuff?

  9. Common object space • NSLPs should use a common GIST object space. • Should protocol message types be the same? • Error codes? • Goals • Do people think that implementations might merge features? • What should be common?

  10. Related things • Mini-TSVWG bar bof on CL, PCN & RMD • http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-briscoe-tsvwg-cl-phb-01.pdf • http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-briscoe-tsvwg-cl-architecture-02.txt • http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-karagiannis-ru-pdb-01.txt • http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/B.Briscoe/presents/0603ietf/Bar_BOF_combined.ppt • http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/B.Briscoe/presents/0603ietf/Bar_BOF_combined.pdf

More Related