1 / 24

Educational Laboratory Virtual Instrumentation Suite (ELVIS)

Educational Laboratory Virtual Instrumentation Suite (ELVIS). May 03-19 Client : National Instruments Advisors : Dr. Mani Mina, Dr. Diane Rover Group Members : Michael Ballou – CprE Ryan Hankins – EE Jason Salz – EE David Schmidt – CprE Dayu Zhou - EE 30 May 2003. Outline.

ronny
Télécharger la présentation

Educational Laboratory Virtual Instrumentation Suite (ELVIS)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Educational Laboratory Virtual Instrumentation Suite (ELVIS) • May 03-19 • Client: National Instruments • Advisors: Dr. Mani Mina, Dr. Diane Rover • Group Members: • Michael Ballou – CprE • Ryan Hankins – EE • Jason Salz – EE • David Schmidt – CprE • Dayu Zhou - EE • 30 May 2003

  2. Outline • Introduction • Project Overview • Project Activities • Resources and Schedule • Summary

  3. Definitions • Educational Laboratory Virtual Instrumentation Suite (ELVIS) – A hardware data acquisition system • Data acquisition (DAQ) – The process of collecting and measuring electrical signals from sensors and transducers and inputting them to a computer for processing • LabVIEW – A graphical programming language used for creating test, measurement, and automation applications, developed by National Instruments

  4. Acknowledgement • David Gardner • Randy Hoskin

  5. Problem Statement • GeneralBackground • Convert current EE lab to ELVIS • Document the conversion process

  6. Problem Statement

  7. General Solution • Redo EE 201 labs • Write instructions for students • Find volunteer to follow the instructions • Develop new interfaces • Test • Document the conversion process

  8. Operating Environment • Standard laboratory condition • Indoors • Clean air • PC with Windows

  9. Intended User and Uses • User • Instructors or TAs who intend to use ELVIS in their circuit or electronics labs • Uses • Help users with conversion process

  10. Assumptions and Limitations • Assumptions • ELVIS bundle from NI in working condition • The group can create virtual instruments that are not provided • Limitations • No current or inductance measurement capacity • Measurement inaccuracy • Limited knowledge of internal design

  11. End-Product Description and Deliverables • Selected labs will be converted to ELVIS system • New instructions for selected labs • Documentation of conversion process

  12. Present Accomplishments • Familiarity with ELVIS hardware and software • Carried out EE 201 labs 1, 5 and 6 with the ELVIS system • Produced new documentation for completing EE 201 labs 1, 5 and 6 with the ELVIS system

  13. Approaches Considered and Used • Considered • Creating new virtual instruments • Individually converting every lab for use with ELVIS • Used • Decided to use Virtual Instruments provided by NI for their ease of use and functionality • Focused on key labs which made use of different features of ELVIS

  14. Research and Design Activities • Research • Read National Instrument’s ELVIS manual • Researched how others are using ELVIS • Design • Updated labs to make use of unique capabilities present in the ELVIS system

  15. Implementation Activities • Took notes as we implemented several EE 201 labs using ELVIS • Created new lab instructions for the labs that could be completed with ELVIS

  16. Testing Activities • Asked a EE major to follow our new lab instructions • Asked a ChemE major to follow our new lab instructions • Reviewed our own instructions to ensure completeness • Tested the accuracy of ELVIS

  17. Test Results

  18. Personnel Effort

  19. Financial Budget

  20. Project Schedule

  21. Project Evaluation • Analyze necessary virtual instruments (100%) • Completion of virtual instrument interface (100%) • Completion of necessary documentation (100%) • Completion of testing (100%) • Revision (100%) • Working demonstration of ELVIS (100%)

  22. Closing • Commercialization • No commercial application • Used by ECpE department • Additional Work • Re-evaluate ELVIS using non-prototype unit • Lessons Learned • Time Management • Team Communication • Risk Management

  23. Summary • Project Goals • Evaluate ELVIS for ECpE • Document conversion process • Approach Taken • Utilize tools provided by NI • Preserve educational concepts taught in lab • End Result • Sample of EE 201 labs • Conversion documentation

  24. Questions • ?

More Related