1 / 37

David Bushnell, retired 775 Northampton Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94303 bush@sonic January 2015

Minimum weight design by GENOPT/BIGBOSOR4 of an externally pressurized circumferentially corrugated cylindrical shell and verification by STAGS. David Bushnell, retired 775 Northampton Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94303 bush@sonic.net January 2015. Summary. What is GENOPT? What is BIGBOSOR4?

rrivers
Télécharger la présentation

David Bushnell, retired 775 Northampton Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94303 bush@sonic January 2015

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Minimum weight design by GENOPT/BIGBOSOR4 of an externally pressurized circumferentially corrugated cylindrical shell and verification by STAGS David Bushnell, retired 775 Northampton Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94303 bush@sonic.net January 2015

  2. Summary • What is GENOPT? • What is BIGBOSOR4? • Geometry, decision variables • Behaviors that constrain the design during optimization cycles • The objective: WEIGHT • Optimization via SUPEROPT • “Smoothing” segments • Nonlinear axisymmetric pre-buckling behavior • Local bifurcation buckling from BIGBOSOR4 and STAGS • General bifurcation buckling from BIGBOSOR4 and STAGS • Extreme sensitivity of an optimized design to perturbations • Conclusions

  3. GENOPT is used in combination with BIGBOSOR4. Optimization is performed with GENOPT/BIGBOSOR4/ADS. The optimizer is ADS, a gradient-based optimizer written by Vanderplaats and his colleagues in the 1980s

  4. What is BIGBOSOR4? • Stress, buckling and vibration of elastic shells of revolution (BIGBOSOR4=BOSOR4 with more shell segments permitted, up to 295 shell segments as of 2011). • Nonlinear axisymmetric stress analysis • Linear non-axisymmetric stress analysis • Axisymmetric or non-axisymmetric bifurcation buckling • Linear vibration modes of axisymmetrically loaded shell • Multi-segment, branched, ring-stiffened shells of revolution • Various wall constructions • BIGBOSOR4 cannot handle local shell segment transverse shear deformation (t.s.d.) or local shell wall anisotropy or bifurcation buckling with applied in-plane shear loading. Use a factor of safety to compensate for these effects on local buckling.

  5. Last year’s paper: longitudinally corrugated prismatic panels

  6. This year’s paper: circumferentially corrugated shells

  7. Decision variables in last year’s format

  8. Decision variables in this year’s format

  9. The circumferentially corrugated shell of revolution is optimized subject to the following “behavioral” constraints: • Local buckling that is symmetric about the symmetry plane at X = WIDTH/2 • General buckling that is symmetric about the symmetry plane at X = WIDTH/2. • General buckling that is anti-symmetric about the symmetry plane at X = WIDTH/2. • Maximum allowable stress

  10. The objective is: • Objective= WEIGHT (lb) of the entire panel of WIDTH = X inches

  11. Optimization via the GENOPT command “SUPEROPT” in order to find a “global” optimum design

  12. Difficulties optimizing when nonlinear theory is used in BIGBOSOR4: BIGBOSOR4 quits.

  13. “Smoothing” segments are used to eliminate “corners”, as was done last year

  14. Nonlinear axisymmetric pre-buckling deformation under uniform external lateral normal pressure (no pr/2 axial loading!)

  15. Pressure-end-displacement curves for the nonlinear axisymmetric pre-buckling state

  16. Nonlinear local buckling from the BIGBOSOR4 model of the nonlinearly optimized “mich8” configuration

  17. Nonlinear local buckling from the STAGS model of the nonlinearly optimized “mich8” configuration

  18. Nonlinear general buckling from the BIGBOSOR4 model of the nonlinearly optimized “mich8” configuration

  19. Nonlinear general buckling from the STAGS model of the nonlinearly optimized “mich8” configuration

  20. Comparison of predictions from BIGBOSOR4 and STAGS for linearly and nonlinearly optimized “mich8” configurations

  21. Design sensitivity of linearly optimized “mich8” configuration

  22. “mich8” also buckles under INTERNAL pressure

  23. Conclusions • “Global” optimum designs are difficult to find because of extreme design sensitivity and because of certain difficulties with nonlinear bifurcation buckling calculations in connection with optimization. • BIGBOSOR4 and STAGS predictions agree very well for linearly optimized configurations. • BIGBOSOR4 and STAGS predictions differ somewhat for nonlinearly optimized configurations. • Nonlinear effects are significant for optimized designs in the cases treated here.

More Related