1 / 19

EXTERNAL MANAGEMENT – A PRACTITIONER’S VIEW ( Bank of Korea)

EXTERNAL MANAGEMENT – A PRACTITIONER’S VIEW ( Bank of Korea). Chang-Ho Yoo Reserve Management Department. INTRODUCTION. ■ Objectives of the Presentation ▷ To explain about the practical aspects of external management ▷ To introduce the BOK’s practice

rude
Télécharger la présentation

EXTERNAL MANAGEMENT – A PRACTITIONER’S VIEW ( Bank of Korea)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EXTERNAL MANAGEMENT– A PRACTITIONER’S VIEW(Bank of Korea) Chang-Ho Yoo Reserve Management Department

  2. INTRODUCTION • ■ Objectives of the Presentation • ▷ To explain about the practical aspects of external management • ▷ To introduce the BOK’s practice • ■ Major Contents of the Presentation • ▷ Overview of the BOK’s external management scheme • ▷ Issues in the process of decision-making and implementation • ▷ KIC as an external manager of the BOK • ▷ Other related issues

  3. INTRODUCTION • ■ External management business is not very straightforward • → “art” rather than finance or quantitative science • • Half front office task and half middle office task • ■ In some sense, it is very complicated and difficult • ▷ Many parties are involved • • external managers vs. internal managers • • external management vs. internal middle and back offices • ▷ Not much is known to CBs (due to confidentiality) • ▷ Also, vulnerable to criticism from outside (of CBs) • ⇒ Should maintain a consistent and logical approach

  4. OVERVIEW OF THE SCHEME • ■ Objectives and significance • ▷ Performance enhancement and investment in a new area • ▷ Acquiring advanced investment techniques and strategies • ▷ Training and knowledge transfer • ■ History • ▷ Started from 1992 • ▷ Volume has been increased proportional to the growth of reserves • ▷ Number of funds and investment universe have been expanded • • Entrusting to the KIC since 2006 • ■ Manager of external managers: External Management Team • • Middle office (in Reserve Management Department)

  5. PROCESS Objectives & Constraints ● Investment universe ● Risks and returns ● Number of funds and managers Selection of managers ●Benchmarks ● Investment guidelines Monitoring & Evaluation Actual management ● Active/passive management

  6. PORTFOLIO CONSTRUCTION • ■ Factors affecting the amount of external management • • Investment universe • • Cost/benefit • • Internal capacity of reserve management • ■ The total size can be determined in the process of overall asset allocation • ▷ For new instruments, x% rule is also desirable • ■ Benchmark • ▷ In many cases, market index is enough • ▷ Larger universe by way of investment guidelines • • Should consider the status as foreign exchange reserves

  7. SELECTION OF MANAGERS • ■ Main criteria in selecting external managers; • ▷ Financial status (and credit ratings) • ▷ Management size and experience • ▷ Track record (past performance) • ▷ Risk management capacity • ▷ Reporting capacity • ▷ Fee level • ▷ Training capacity • ■ Simultaneous screening on the same basis over multiple institutions • ▷ The process includes paper screening and presentation

  8. FEES • ■ Flat fees vs. Performance fees • ▷ Flat fees: Proportional to the size of the mandate • • If the size for one manager increases, the total amount of fee will increase • - But fee rate will decrease • ▷ Performance fee: Determined by out-performance • • Benchmark construction and risk management are very important • ▷ Combination of the two types is also possible. • ■ Issues to be considered • ▷ Should fee proposal be a factor in selecting managers? • ▷ Should we negotiate the fee level with each and every manager?

  9. CUSTODIAN • ■ Contributes to transparency and control through external validation of • asset values and performance <source: World Bank Treasury> • (Core services) (Other services) • ■ Multiple custodians? • ▷ Good for comparison, competition, and flexibility • ▷ Difficult to consolidate different reporting, risk management systems Performance measurement Safekeeping Accounting Compliance with guidelines Valuation Reporting Risk measurement (basic)

  10. CUSTODIAN • Truster Asset Delivery Custodian Fee Asset Management Service Administration Service Management Fee • External • Manager • Custodian Book Reconciliation Asset Delivery

  11. AGREEMENTS (IMA) • ■ Contents of IMA (investment management agreement) • ▷ Main agreement: “standardized” • • Definitions • • Powers and obligations of Manager • • Ownership and authorization • • Confidentiality and other legal aspects • ▷ Schedules • • Investment policy and guidelines • - Including benchmark, eligible investments, restrictions and limits • • Fee • • Reporting

  12. MONITORING AND EVALUATION • ■ Reporting • ▷ Weekly/Monthly/Quarterly/Yearly • ▷ Position, strategy, performance, risks, accounting • ▷ Custodian can play a role in reporting • ■ Reviews • ▷ Semi-annually, face-to-face discussion • ■ Due Diligence (on site) • ▷ For monitoring as well as selection purposes • ⇒ Monitoring is time-consuming, but a very essential and important process

  13. REBALANCING • ■ When do we need rebalancing; • ▷ Changes in external management policy • ▷ Rearranging investment instruments • ▷ Consistent under- or out-performance • ▷ Breaches of agreements • ■ Should consider cost of rebalancing • ⇒ Frequent rebalancing is not very desirable • ▷ For new investment instruments, new portfolio can be added • ▷ When necessary, transition management service is helpful

  14. OTHER RELATED ISSUES • ■ Risk management • ▷ Limits reflected in guidelines • • Minimum credit ratings, duration deviation • • Restrictions on derivatives (if needed) • ▷ Soft limit of risks: e.g. tracking error • ■ Harmonization with direct investment • ▷ In terms of accounting, risk management, and other internal reporting • • Time gap due to collecting data • • Difference in accounting practice • • Difficulty in overall risk budgeting

  15. KIC- Establishment - • ■ Background of setting up KIC • ▷ Taking advantage of huge FX reserves and overseas investment demands • • Effectively managing public foreign currency assets • - As an external manager • • Nurturing of asset management industry • ■ KIC Act passed in National Assembly in May 2005 ■ BOK and MOFE agreement: For initial entrustment ▷ Providing KIC with $20 billion of reserves • “Seed money” • $17 billion from BOK, $3 billion from MOFE’s FESF • ■ BOK and KIC conclusion of IMA in June 2006

  16. KIC- Investment - • ■ Relationship between the BOK and the KIC • ▷ The asset truster and trustee • • BOK provides KIC with investment benchmark and guidelines • • Profits and losses of the KIC’s investment belong to BOK • • BOK pays KIC management fee • ■ Investment universe • ▷ BOK’s entrustment: Limited to bonds and high-grade stocks • Investment in PEFs or real estates prohibited • → Assets entrusted by BOK retains reserves status • ▷ Investment benchmark based on international bond and stock indices

  17. KIC- Investment - • ■ Investment strategy • ▷ Sufficient discretion given to KIC • • Financial derivatives permitted • • KIC can freely choose investment strategy • - within its guidelines and risk limits (in terms of tracking errors) • ■ Investment development • ▷ Initial investment of $20 billion to be completed by early next year • ▷ Expected to gradually increase weights of direct investment ▷ More entrustment expected from the Government, national pension funds or other sources

  18. KIC- Further Issues - • ■ Transparency • ▷ By the KIC Act, KIC discloses its operational status and investment • performance annually • ■ KIC is not a typical SWF • ▷ Current sources of KIC assets limited to FX reserves • Not bought by the Government (unlike the CIC) • ▷ But, Korea’s FX reserves are “borrowed money” accompanying liabilities • Resulting from sterilization policy in the FX market • • Fundamentally different from “pure assets”

  19. Q & A Thank you!

More Related