Who, That: It’s All Relative

Who, That:It’s All Relative …A Comedy in IV Acts

Supporting Cast Place all of the authors’ names here (First then Last). Because we have so many make this small and probably in two columns. Starring… Main Cast Amy Craig Allen Harrell Michael Johnson EmmieKinard

Plot Summary Four wily academics embark on a journey for the Holy Grail of grammar, Truth. Along their adventure, absurdity ensues; though with a Chuck-Norris-worthy effort, the four heroes find something greater than what they had originally sought…

PROLOGUE What do two copy editors, one TESOL instructor, and one undergraduate English major have in common? • A thorough understanding, perhaps a hang up, on the “rules” of English grammar. • As we were sharing our favorite grammar pet peeves, Amy mentioned the idiom “the one THAT got away” and how she thought it should be “the one WHO got away.” • As our group thought about this, we recalled a simple prescriptive “rule” for relative pronouns: who is for people, that is for objects. • We decided to pursue this further and posed several hypotheses.

ACT I: Survey of Literature • While we started out with a prescriptive rule in mind, we were quickly reminded that rules are made to be broken and that language is infinitely more complex than a set a prescriptive rules. • Jack Lynch and Edward Good agree with the “prescriptive rule,”but many sources do not espouse such a rule. • For instance, In the oldest grammar guide we could find, written by Lindley Murray in 1808, stated, “Who is applied to persons, which to animals and inanimate things…” and “That, as a relative, is often used to prevent too frequent repetition of who and which” • Leech and Svartvikwrite, “That is used with both personal and non-personal reference. However, it cannot follow a preposition, and is not usually used in non-restrictive relative clauses” (386). • Furthermore, Paul Brians, author of Common Errors in English Usage, says, interestingly, “An aversion to “that” referring to human beings as somehow diminishing their humanity may be praiseworthily sensitive, but it cannot claim the authority of tradition. In some sentences, “that” is clearly preferable to “who…”

…. • The Merriam-Webster Dictionary of English Usage supports Brians’ opinion, saying, “that was the first relative pronoun, existing at least since Middle English. Which came next, followed by who(m); both already existed in the language, but only began to be used as relative pronouns in the 14th and 15th centuries”.

Act II: Research Questions We need to talk about our frame, the Hartwell stuff.

Research Questions 1. Do students appear to follow any “rule” when using who and that? 2. What is the current trend in usage of these two relative pronouns?

Act III: Methodology • Hypothesis # 1: “Do students appear to follow any “rule” when using who and that?” • To examine this, we administered surveys to 93 students (77 Native English speakers and 16 Non-native)

Survey • Our survey questions were crafted to test different aspects/conditions of the usage of “who”vs. “that.” • These included : • Abstraction • Identity • Literature • Idiomatic Expression • & Testing Against a Rule

Survey • Our survey consists of 12 questions* and was administered to 93 students • The students are pupils of Allen, Michael, and Amy’s classes • Each question was chosen with an expected answer, which made the results very interesting. • Every question had the answer choices of either A. who or B. that

Survey (a few examples) • Our first question came straight from L&S: • The workers _ were on strike made a deal with their company. • A. 60 ~65% • B. 33 ~35%

Survey (a few examples) • Question two came from The Apprenticeship of DuddyKravitz, 1959 • “…Take while I’m in an offering mood. I’m not the Red Cross _ you can call at any emergency.” -Richler • A. 44 ~47% • B. 49 ~ 53%

Survey (a few examples) • The third question also came from a work of literature. However, this work by Shakespeare is much older than the previous one, but that is once again the relative pronoun used. • “I’ll make a ghost of him _ lets me.”Shakespeare, Hamlet • A. 71~ 76% • B. 22 ~ 24%

Survey (a few examples) • Our fourth question is very interesting because it is an idiomatic expression • She is the one _ got away. • A. 51~55% • B. 42~ 45%

Survey (a few examples) • Question five is another question that came from our L&S book • He is a guy _ always answers e-mail. • A. 66 ~ 71% • B. 27 ~ 29%

What does this tell us? “While interesting, our survey data unfortunately contains mostly spurious results when testing for our first hypothesis. That is, if we use our control question as we intended (which sets a .06 significance level), a question would need to have 94% of the responses to count as significant, to show students are making a certain choice because of a prescriptive rule, [which did not happen]…. Not finding a pattern, however, only reifies our conclusion from our survey of literature: if there is a rule, it is the minority, not the majority, who chose to follow it consistently.”****

Methodology • Research question 2: “What is the current trend in usage of these two relative pronouns?” • To look at the current trends with these two, we used COCA

Survey (a few examples) • Abstraction & Identity

Survey (a few examples) • Idiomatic Expression

Survey (a few examples) • Testing Against a Rule

An Interlude: Post Facto Interest • After we had collected and analyzed the data for our first 2 hypotheses, we returned to something that piqued our interest in the survey of literature: the historical relationship between who and that.

Google Ngram of Historical Relationship “Person who” vs. “Person that”

So What? This MAY relate to the Industrial Revolution, the boom in education, and grammars like Murray’s (which become hyper-rule based when taught, creating the “strict form” of who=people and that=objects). But an extensive investigation of this issue is beyond the scope of our paper.

Act IV: Conclusion • Based on the results of our research into historical literature on the existence of a rule, our survey, and our search for usage trends in the corpora, it is not possible to conclusively declare that there ever existed a prescriptive rule per se. That was in use as the HRRP of choice, followed by a seemingly inexplicable surge in the use of who and which. When grammars came into prominence and secular education began to be strongly endorsed for an emerging middle class, the usage of that, who, and which became more prescribed, yet a formalized rule remained contested. That is, our results, as a whole, tend to support – whether participants seem to think there is a hard and fast rule or not – the idea that there is confusion about which HRRP to use. However, the corpus data support that there is an idea out there that a rule exists, otherwise the results would have yielded a more even split between the uses of who and that.***

Appendix A • Place survey here.

Who, That: It’s All Relative