1 / 10

Evaluating Reform to the Handling of Crossover Youth in California: AB 129

Evaluating Reform to the Handling of Crossover Youth in California: AB 129. Association for Criminal Justice Research October 20, 2005. Presentation Overview. Status of AB129 implementation Challenges that counties have posed Technical assistance to the courts

rupali
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluating Reform to the Handling of Crossover Youth in California: AB 129

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluating Reform to the Handling of Crossover Youth in California: AB 129 Association for Criminal Justice Research October 20, 2005

  2. Presentation Overview • Status of AB129 implementation • Challenges that counties have posed • Technical assistance to the courts • Overview of evaluation requirements • Overview of evaluation plans

  3. Where are we? • Many counties working toward signed protocol • Many questions and challenges have been posed regarding implementation • AOC sponsored symposium

  4. Major challenges • Allocation of responsibilities among court and agency • Resources • Information sharing • How to identify and screen for appropriate cases • ASFA issues • Determining the most effective model • Net widening • Obtaining the data required for the evaluation

  5. Technical assistance to address challenges • 27 counties attended AOC sponsored symposium on June 20th in San Francisco. • California Department of Social Services working on “All County Letter” • Workshop at the Beyond the Bench conference in December • Data collection and evaluation consultation

  6. Protocol must contain plan to collect data • Description of eligibility process • Description of assessment process • Ensure communication between dependency and delinquency judges 4. Plan to collect data in order to evaluate the protocol pursuant to Section 241.2

  7. W&I 241.2: legislatively mandated • Report to legislature on implementation of protocols • Use representative sample of counties that create protocol • Report findings within two years of first child being deemed dual status • Counties must include plan for collecting required data in protocol

  8. Two-pronged approach to evaluation • Descriptive component for all counties • Taxonomy of protocols • Case characteristics and hearing outcome for all cases that fall under protocol • In-depth/outcome-focused component with a sample of counties (”study counties”)

  9. Study county evaluation • Four to six counties • Mix of large/small, urban/rural • Mix of models • Additional descriptive data elements • Child and family outcomes • Impacts on courts and agencies • No design yet—need to first understand how implemented • Collaborative research design

  10. AOC contact information Audrey Fancy, Senior Attorney 415-865-7706 audrey.fancy@jud.ca.gov Michelle Diamond, Research Analyst 415-865-7569 michelle.diamond@jud.ca.gov

More Related