1 / 24

Dependable Web Service Compositions usng a Semantic Replication Scheme

Dependable Web Service Compositions usng a Semantic Replication Scheme. LABORATÓRIO DE SISTEMAS DISTRIBUÍDOS – LASID DEPARTAMENTO DE CIÊNCIA DA COMPUTAÇÃO - DCC UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA BAHIA - UFBA. Daniela Barreiro Claro 1. Raimundo José de Araújo Macêdo 2. SBRC 2008.

ryanadan
Télécharger la présentation

Dependable Web Service Compositions usng a Semantic Replication Scheme

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dependable Web Service Compositions usng a Semantic Replication Scheme LABORATÓRIO DE SISTEMAS DISTRIBUÍDOS – LASID DEPARTAMENTO DE CIÊNCIA DA COMPUTAÇÃO - DCC UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA BAHIA - UFBA Daniela Barreiro Claro1 Raimundo José de Araújo Macêdo2 SBRC 2008 • Dr. Daniela Barreiro Claro is supported by FAPESB (BOL2071/2006). • Prof. Raimundo José de Araujo Macêdo is supported by FAPESB and CNPQ(Edital Universal).

  2. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach Outline • Motivation • Dependability requirements for WSC • The SAREK approach • Experimental tests • Performance evaluation • Comparison with related work • Conclusion and future directions Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 2

  3. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach Motivation • Web services are autonomous applications that can be published, located and invoked over the Internet. • Due to their potential for heterogeneous integration, companies are implementing their business as a Web service format. • However, a single Web service cannot fulfill a user request and need to be combined. Web service Composition Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 3

  4. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach Motivation • Whereas WS specifications cover dependable issues, no one handles the problem of dependable and automatic Web service compositions. • This raises another problem: a single WS failure, thus the failure of the whole composition. • Availability or continuity of service must be taken into account to apply WSC in critical applications. Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 4

  5. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach Motivation • A commonly used technique for improving availability is to replicate services. • This work tackles the problem of dependability requirements of WSC, using ontologies to form a set of semantically alike replicas. • We propose a framework SAREK where a failure of a primary service can be masked by the execution of another service semantically compatible. Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 5

  6. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach Required Properties for WSC • Some kinds of faults should be treated by a fault tolerant mechanism in order to reach the goal of a WSC. • unavailability of a Web service • partially operational WS • Internet disconnections • Some mechanisms have been introduced • FT-SOAP, WS-Reliability, WS-Replication, etc Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 6

  7. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach Required Properties for WSC • Data Consistency • WSC should guarantee the integrity of data in its execution • Computation Availability • It is not possible to assume that all WS in a composition are reliable. A WSC should guarantee availability without knowing the reliability level of single WS • Scalability • WSC ability to handle a growing amount of WS • Transparency • WS is included and removed from a composition in a transparent way Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 7

  8. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach The SAREK approach • System model and assumptions • A set of activities m is the number of activities. • A set of services n is the number of services. • Candidate services is a subset of Service for a specific activity • A composition C is a sequence of activities performed by a set of services • WS are implemented as processes • Channels are assumed to be reliable Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 8

  9. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach The SAREK Approach • SAREK is a modified and enhanced version of SPOC1 • SAREK is divided into two modules • The Planner Module • Aims to automatically determine the activities for a given composition • The Executor Module • Aims to execute the composition defined by the Planner • Both modules are replicated using a passive replication mechanism. 1. Claro D.B, Albers P. And Hao, J-K. A framework for automatic composition of RFQ Web services. In IEEE SCW/ WSCA-ICWS, Salt Lake City, USA. 2007 Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 9

  10. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 10

  11. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach The Planner Module • The Planner is divided into two main phases: Planning and Optimization • The Planning phase • It uses an AI Planning algorithm based on preconditions and effects • Interacts with OPS (an OWL ontology) to discover services • Each WS is described using an OWL-S format • This phase aims to determine which activity belongs to the composition in order to fulfill the user request • It main issue is the set of activities A that can reach the given request Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 11

  12. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach The Planner Module • The Optimization phase • Optimizes the combination of WS and activities • The values used to optimize are based on estimated values retrieved from each candidate Web service • It seems a quotation system • Produces a set of semantic similar compositions • We used a genetic algorithm called NSGA-II to get the Pareto optimal solutions, i.e. the compositions Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 12

  13. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach The Executor Module • This module executes the composition using the prefix mechanism • In order to provide fault tolerance both a transactional approach and a replication mechanism are applied. • Semantic replication scheme • Transactional Level Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 13

  14. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach The Executor Module • Semantic replication scheme • Faulty Web service can be replaced by a semantically similar service (transparency property) • Kind of spatial redundancy, because there is a set of compositions that achieve the same goal. • The prefix approach increases performance • Only the failed partition of the composition is re-executed and the prefix . It saves recovery time supposing that the service s3failed. Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 14

  15. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach The Executor Module • Transactional Level • Temporal redundancy mechanism, SAREK tries one more time to recover from a possible transient fault • If the problem persists, and no other semantic similar composition can be replaced, SAREK roll back the previous executed Web service • Using ACID or a compensation technique Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 15

  16. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach Experimental Tests • Case Study • SAREK was applied to a bidding process for repairing public buildings. • Prototype implementation of SAREK • Java 1.5, Apache Tomcat 5.0, Axis 1.3, Jena API 2.3, OWL-S API 1.1.0 and MySQL Database 4.1 • Experiments were carried out in single computer • Inter motherboard Core Duo, processor T2300 1.66 Ghz and 1Gb of RAM. Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 16

  17. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach Simulated scenario • 4 activities • supplyWood, supplyConcrete, supplyIron and buildStaircase • Each activity can be performed by 2 candidate services Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 17

  18. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach Simulated scenario • There is one WSDL operations for execution • String executeWS() • Results were produced by 2 runs • Without failures Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 18

  19. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach Simulated scenario • With failures (services 5, 3, 6 failed) Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 19

  20. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach Performance Evaluation • Each experiment was run 400 times for calculating the average time and standard deviation • Two kinds of experiments • A composition is fixed • A composition is randomly chosen Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 20

  21. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach Performance Evaluation • The overhead caused by faults for an increasing the number of forced Web services failures. Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 21

  22. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach Related Work • Comparison in the light of the required dependability properties for automatic WSC Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 22

  23. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach Conclusion and future directions • Challenges for achieving Dependable Web service compositions • Suggesting a set of required dependability properties. • To the best of our knowledge, SAREK is the first framework that provides such fault tolerant guarantees in WSC • Future works • Evaluate the fault tolerant mechanism in real scenarios Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 23

  24. Experimental Tests Performance Evaluation Comparison with Related Work Conclusion Outline Motivation Properties for WSC SAREK approach Thank you! Daniela Barreiro Claro dclaro@ufba.br Raimundo Macêdo macedo@ufba.br http://www.lasid.ufba.br LaSiD/DCC/UFBa Daniela Barreiro Claro Raimundo Macêdo Dependable Web Service Compositions using a dclaro@ufba.br macedo@ufba.br Semantic Replication Scheme 24

More Related