1 / 9

Mid Kent Improvement Partnership (MKIP)

Mid Kent Improvement Partnership (MKIP). Formed in 2008 Partly in response to potential Unitary Threat Kent Agreement – all Kent LA’s committed to working in collaboration Funded from a contribution by each authority Originally 4 local Authorities

saad
Télécharger la présentation

Mid Kent Improvement Partnership (MKIP)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mid Kent Improvement Partnership(MKIP) • Formed in 2008 • Partly in response to potential Unitary Threat • Kent Agreement – all Kent LA’s committed to working in collaboration • Funded from a contribution by each authority • Originally 4 local Authorities • Ashford, Maidstone, Swale and Tunbridge Wells • Ashford chose to pull out in 2010 but retained the successful shared Audit Service

  2. Objectives • Working in partnership to: • Improve the quality of service to communities; • Improve the resilience of service delivery; • Deliver efficiency savings in the procurement, management and delivery of services; • Explore opportunities for trading in the medium to long-term; • Share best practice; and • Stabilise or reduce the environmental impact of service provision.

  3. What is MKIP? • Not a legal entity – partnership of equals • Funded by contributions from each authority • More than just shared services: • Joint procurement, sharing best practice, sharing officers • Delivered 8 shared services since 2008 • Audit, HR, Revenues and Benefits, Fraud, Legal, ICT, Planning Support, Environmental Health • 4 way, 3 way and 2 way arrangements

  4. MKIP Board and Governance • Leader and Chief Executive of each authority • Not decision making – remains with the each Cabinet and Council • Appoint shared service boards (operational) • Director of Shared Services ( recent appt.) • MKIP Programme Manager

  5. MKIP Numbers By MKIP’s 10th year (2017/18): • £2.25m annual savings • £13.3m total savings for £2.15m of investment, or • £6 return for every £1 invested Grown from 12 person Audit team in 2008/09 to over 240 staff (predicted) 2014/15

  6. MKIP – what has been learned Vision must be clearly: • Co-defined, and co-committed and co-communicated Decision making must be: • Rapid, Transparent and Strategic Sovereignty must be: Defined, Agreed and Shared ‘I can’t stand this indecision, Married with a lack of vision, Everybody wants to rule the world…’ Tears for Fears

  7. MKIP – what has been learned Staffing • Recognise that staff working in a shared environment are in a different physical and psychological space Loyalty and belonging • Be aware of the psychological contract and its affect on performance

  8. MKIP : The future? • Move 2 way partnerships to 3 way • Further shared service arrangements • Existing arrangements underpinned by consolidated ICT hardware, software and co-terminus contracts - Single Data Centre - Reduced line of Business Applications - Rationalised Telephony and Contact Centre

  9. MKIP : focus on the end game ‘Everything will be OKin the end If its not OK, we just haven’t got to the end yet…’ Attributed to John Lennon

More Related