1 / 11

Research Methodology and Methods of Social Inquiry GSSR October 11 201 1 Research Design

Research Methodology and Methods of Social Inquiry GSSR October 11 201 1 Research Design. Research Design Research design: plan that shows, through the discussion of the causal (theoretical) model & the data, how we expect to make inferences. Stages of Social Research

sabin
Télécharger la présentation

Research Methodology and Methods of Social Inquiry GSSR October 11 201 1 Research Design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Research Methodology and Methods of Social Inquiry GSSR October 11 2011 Research Design

  2. Research Design Research design: plan that shows, through the discussion of the causal (theoretical) model & the data, how we expect to make inferences.

  3. Stages of Social Research FORMULATION OF RESEARCH PROBLEM & THEORETICAL MODEL Chose variables and specify hypothesis PREPARATION OF RESEARCH DESIGN Define population and select sample. Develop instruments MEASUREMENT SAMPLING DATA COLLECTION DATA ORGANIZATION AND PROCESSING ANALYSES AND INTERPRETATION Make decisions about the fit of data and theory. Results are communicated to an audience. (Confirm or reject your initial theory)

  4. Formulation of Theoretical Model & Research Problem • Choosing the research question - researchable; ‘What ?’ questions; ‘Why ?” questions - interesting; no-surprize; „so what ?” • Theory • Comprehensive literature review

  5. What do these help achieve? A. Whom do we study? (units of observation) B. Which characteristics of these units do we study? (Variables) C. What are our hypotheses? (i.e. the expected relationships btw. the variables) D. Understand (better) the results; interpretation.

  6. Units of Observation (units of analysis; cases) - individuals (micro-level); - households; families; networks, organizations (meso-level); - cities; states/counties; countries; regions (macro-level) Sampling: size & representativeness Aggregate Data - data gathered at one set of units (e.g. the individual) that are combined (i.e. expressed in a summary form) to describe a larger social unit (for ex. cities). Ex: Measure of city’s socioeconomic resources: average income and education of its inhabitants; \ High School performance measure: % of students who go on to college after graduation

  7. Assumptions made about individuals based on aggregate data are vulnerable to the ecological fallacy (ecological inference fallacy) This fallacy assumes that individual members of a group have the average characteristics of the group at large. \ Ex: Aggregate data on income for a neighborhood of a city shows that the average household income for the residents of that area is $30,000. The ecological fallacy can occur if we state, based on these data, that people living in the area earn about $30,000 Neighborhood = actually composed of 2 types of residential areas: - lower socio-economic group of residents; earn on average $10,000 - higher socio-economic group; average $50,000.

  8. B. Variables = Characteristics of the units of observation A variable is a measurable characteristic that differs across observation units. Each variable assumes a set of some definite values. Units ofVariables observation Age Gender Education Political Party Case # 1 21 0 12 0 Case # 2 36 1 16 3 Case # 3 23 1 15 2 . . . . . . . . . . Case # n 33 0 17 1

  9. C. Hypotheses A hypothesis is a prediction about how variables relate to each other (i.e. what is the relationship btw. the variables). Relationships btw. Variables: changes in the values of one variable are accompanied by systematic changes in the other variable(s). A hypothesis is usually based on theoretical expectations about how things work. At minimum, any hypothesis involves 2 variables: - the dependent variable (DV) measures the presumed effect/outcome; Y - the independent variable (IV) measures the presumed cause; controls; intervening Variables; X

  10. In statistical inference, hypotheses generally two forms: substantive and null. A substantive hypothesis represents an actual expectation about the relationship between 2/more variables. (Ex: higher education increases the likelihood of upward mobility) To decide whether a substantive hypothesis is supported by the evidence, it is necessary to test a related hypothesis, called the null hypothesis (Ex: education has no effect on mobility.) Spurious Associations A statistically significant association between 2 variables, driven by a third variable, which affects both. Ex: positive relation (correlation) between number of firefighters at the sight of a fire, and the amount of damage produced.

  11. Major methods in social science research: - experiments - surveys - content analysis - participant observation - secondary analysis

More Related