1 / 22

Hotel InterContinental, Toronto Centre Toronto Ontario October 23, 2009

Day 2. Hotel InterContinental, Toronto Centre Toronto Ontario October 23, 2009. Behavioural Finance / Investment Beliefs. Overview. What is behavioural finance? Common behavioural biases and their implications for investment beliefs and decision making. What is Behavioural Finance?.

sachi
Télécharger la présentation

Hotel InterContinental, Toronto Centre Toronto Ontario October 23, 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Day 2 Hotel InterContinental, Toronto Centre Toronto Ontario October 23, 2009

  2. Behavioural Finance / Investment Beliefs

  3. Overview • What is behavioural finance? • Common behavioural biases and their implications for investment beliefs and decision making

  4. What is Behavioural Finance? • Relatively new school of thought • Gradually recognized as a legitimate field in finance in the 1990s • A marriage of psychology and finance • It says psychology plays a role in financial decision making • Is it a surprise that we are human? • Cognitive errors and biases affect investment beliefs, and hence financial choices • Poses a challenge to the traditional idea that markets are always efficient

  5. What is Behavioural Finance? • Why should we care? • To better understand our own investment behavior, and that of others  set the right incentives for clients, pension plan design, financial product design • To better understand asset management companies and active strategies that base their investment philosophy on behavioral finance • Even retail banking is talking to customers about it • E.g. CIBC Imperial Service: Investor Psychology 101 • Taking investor psychology into account

  6. Behavioural Biases • Summary of well-known cognitive errors and biases, and their impact on investment beliefs and financial decision making • Overconfidence • Loss aversion • Narrow framing • Representativeness • Regret avoidance • Ambiguity aversion • Mental accounting

  7. Overconfidence • Better than average • “I am a better than average driver.” • 95% of British drivers believe they are better than average (Sutherland 1992) • Illusion of control • “I am unlikely to be involved in a car accident.” • As applied to investments, overconfidence may lead to excessive trading • “Trading is hazardous to your wealth” by Barber and Odean (2000a) • Find that portfolio turnover is a good predictor of poor performance: Investors who traded the most had the lowest returns net of transaction costs • Barber and Odean (2000b): Result mostly confined to one particular gender…

  8. Barber and Odean (2000a)

  9. Why Don’t They Learn? • Similar results in other studies: Overconfident traders contribute less to desk profits (Fenton-O’Creevy et al. 2007) • Why don’t overconfident investors learn from their mistakes? • Self-attribution bias • Attribute successes to their own ability • Blame failures on bad luck • Selection of portfolio managers/traders: Type-A personalities or Type-B?

  10. Loss Aversion Prospect Theory Pleasure Small Pleasure -10% Loss Gain +10% Big Pain Pain

  11. Narrow Framing • Loss aversion may be a consequence of narrow framing • Narrow frame of evaluation • Limited set of metrics in evaluating investments • Myopic behavior even though investment is long-term • Obsessive about price changes in a particular stock • Can lead to over-estimation of risk

  12. Narrow Framing / Loss Aversion • Consequence • “Disposition effect”: Tendency to sell winners too soon, and hang on to losers for too long (Shefrin and Statman, 1985, Odean 1998)) • E.g. Nortel • “If I haven’t realized the loss, then it isn’t yet a loss.” • Affects design of financial products • If investor cares more about loss, rather than risk, then products that limit downside risk (or manages shortfall risk) is more attractive than products that have low volatility • Another rationale for asset-liability management (ALM), rather than asset-only management

  13. Myopic Loss Aversion • Example: Currency hedging • Influenced by recent events or stick with long-term view? • Combination of loss aversion and representativeness

  14. Representativeness • Making decisions based on recent history, or a small sample size • Believe that it is representative of the future, or the full sample • May lead to “excessive extrapolation” • Erroneously think that recent performance is representative of longer term prospects • Results: Investors chase past winners • Overreacts to glamour stocks (e.g., technology bubble) • Overreacts to bad news which may be temporary (thus creating “value opportunities”) • Creates short-term momentum, but long-term reversal in returns

  15. Representativeness • Let’s look at performance of portfolio managers Based on a sample of 220 U.S. equity managers (Wood 2006)

  16. Representativeness • Another example of excessive extrapolation: sample size • Erroneously think that a small sample size is representative of the population • E.g. opinion of a car vs. investing in the car company

  17. Regret Avoidance • Leads to procrastination and inertia • Status quo bias • Good intentions but poor follow-through • Consequences: • Delayed saving and investment choices • Defined Contribution Plans: A significant number of accounts are kept in their default allocation for a long time • Limit divergence from peers’ average asset allocation, if sensitive to peer comparison

  18. Ambiguity Aversion • Sticking with the familiar • Results in under-diversification • Investors may exhibit home bias, local bias • Bias is more substantial if take into account human capital • From a diversification point of view, DC plans should restrict company share ownership

  19. Mental Accounting • Tendency to divide total wealth into separate accounts and buckets • Ignores correlation between assets across portfolio • May result in tax-inefficient allocations • Naïve diversification in DC pension plans (Benartzi and Thaler 2001) • 1/n is found to be the predominant rule • Authors find that “the proportion invested in stocks depends strongly on the proportion of stock funds in the plan” • Plan sponsor’s menu of options and choices very important

  20. Impact on Committee Decision Making • Lack of diversity in membership could pose a problem • Common knowledge syndrome • Less willing to share unique or different information for the sake of social cohesion • It takes 16 similarly-minded committee members to generate the diversity of 4 different-minded members

  21. Final Note • Some empirical findings are more respected in the profession than others • Stock market returns affected by number of hours of sunshine, seasonal changes (SAD)…etc. • Point of disagreement • More and more asset management companies are using the “behavioural finance” buzz word (mostly value strategies), as well as investment advisors

  22. Questions?

More Related