1 / 37

United Nations High Level Forum on Global Geospatial Information Management 24 -26 October, Korea 2011. DEVELOPMENT OF C

United Nations High Level Forum on Global Geospatial Information Management 24 -26 October, Korea 2011. DEVELOPMENT OF COMMON FRAMEWORKS AND METHODOLOGIES Mexico. Content. Introduction Legal Framework Standards ( Regulation ) International Experiences RGNA Geodetic Data

sage
Télécharger la présentation

United Nations High Level Forum on Global Geospatial Information Management 24 -26 October, Korea 2011. DEVELOPMENT OF C

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. United Nations High Level Forum on Global Geospatial Information Management 24 -26 October, Korea 2011. DEVELOPMENT OF COMMON FRAMEWORKS AND METHODOLOGIES Mexico

  2. Content • Introduction • Legal Framework • Standards (Regulation) • International Experiences • RGNA Geodetic Data • INEGI Processing Center • Geoid • The North American Atlas • Development of Fundamental Mexico-UnitedStatesTransboundary Data • Central American Geospatial Data Integration • Considerations

  3. Introduction

  4. Introduction HereinispresentedtheMexicanexperience in relationtothedevelopment of regulation (standards) and methodology, as well as jointprojectswithneighboringcountries. Thedevelopment of standardsisbasicfor a coherent, active and operativeNationalStatistical and GeographicalInformationSystem(SNIEG). TheLaw of SNIEG establishesthattheNationalInstitute of Statistics and Geographymustissueregulations and standards.

  5. Legal Framework

  6. Legal Framework Constitution of theMexicanUnitedStates FirstTitle, Chapter I Civil Rights Article 26 B.TheStateshallhave a NationalStatistical and GeographicalInformationSystem, and its data shallbeconsideredofficial data. ItiscompulsoryfortheFederation, the Federal District, states and municipalitiesto use the data producedbytheSystem as stipulated in suchLaw. … TheLawshallestablishtheorganization and operation bases of theNationalStatistical and GeographicalInformationSystemaccordingtotheprinciples of accessibility, transparency, objectivity and independence…

  7. Legal Framework Law of theNationalStatistical and GeographicalInformationSystem (LSNIEG) • Art. 52 LSNIEG TheInstitute,accordingtoArticle 26, Section B of theConstitution of theMexicanUnitedStates, is a publicagencywithtechnical and managementautonomy, with legal personality and ownassets, responsible of theregulation and coordination of theNationalStatistical and GeographicalInformationSystem…

  8. Legal Framework Law of theNationalStatistical and GeographicalInformationSystem(LSNIEG) • Art. 58 LSNIEG TheInstitutewillregulate, bymeans of general directives, thecollection, processing and publication of Information, fortheproperfunctioning of theSystemorwillauthorizethedirectivesusedbytheStateUnitsforsuchactivities.

  9. Legal Framework In orderto produce and disseminate Information of NationalInterest • Units of theState • Federal PublicAdministration • Presidency of theRepublic • General Attorney’s Office • Legislative and Judicial Powers of the Federation • FederativeEntities • Municipalities • Constitutional autonomous organizations • Federal administrative courts Articulated bythe Coordinatedby NationalInformation Network Demographic and Social Economic National Information Subsystems Government, Public Security and Application of Justice Organizedthrough Geographical and Environmental

  10. Legal Framework Components of the NATIONAL SYSTEM OF STATISTICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION NATIONAL CONSULTIVE COUNCIL Demographic and Social Economic National Subsystems of Information Government, Public Security and Application of Justice Geographical and Environmental

  11. NationalConsultive Council Itis a participation and consultationbody in charge of givingitsopinion, suggestions and advising INEGI and itsGoverningBoardwithrespecttothedevelopment of statistical and geographicactivitiesfortheproduction, integration and dissemination of Information of NationalInterest. Itisformedby:

  12. NationalSubsystem of Geographical and EnvironmentalInformation GEOGRAPHICAL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA GROUPS • INDICATORS • Atmosphere • Water • Soil • Flora • Fauna • Hazardouswaste • Solidwaste Natural Resources and Climate Geographical names Cadastre Topography Continental, insular and submarine relief Coastal, international, state and municipalityboundaries Geodetic Reference Frame

  13. NationalSubsystem of Geographical and EnvironmentalInformation ExecutiveCommittee Collegiatebodies of participationthatcontributetointerinstitutionalcoordination and totheimplementation of policiesdefinedfortheexecution of statistical and geographicactivities of SNIEG. VICE PRESIDENT (presides) GOVERNING BOARD TECHNICAL SECRETARY (INEGI) EXECUTIVE SECRETARY (INEGI) COORDINATORS OF:

  14. SpecializedTechnicalCommittees Collegiateinstances of participation and consultationestablishedbyanaggreement of the INEGI GovernmentBoard and formedbyrepresentatives of theUnits of theState and theInstitute, whowillpromotetheirconformation and properoperation. As part of theNationalSubsystem of Statistical and GeographicalInformation, thefollowingSpecializedTechnicalCommitteeshavebeenestablished: Basic Geographic Information Water Climate Change Energy Sector Cadastre and Register Information Land Use, Vegetation and Forest Resources Hazardousemissions, waste and dangeroussubstances

  15. Regulation

  16. TechnicalRegulation In ordertoprovidehighquality, pertinent, truthful and timelyinformation, producedbytheSystem, itisnecessarytoregulatetheinformationprocess: Production Integration Dissemination Preservation

  17. TechnicalRegulation Byissuing general directives, INEGI regulatesthesetting of standards and guidelinesthatguaranteetheircoherence and consistencythroughthefollowingprocedure: INEGI and theUnits of theStategeneratetechnicalregulation ThroughtheSubsystems and throughproposals of theSpecializedTechnicalCommittees Also, theInstitute invites internationalorganizations, uponrequest of anExecutiveCommittee, toreview and giveitsopinionaboutthemethodologiesusedto produce Information of NationalInterest, includingthose of theInstituteitself. Withtheexpertopinion of theExecutiveCommittees TheGoverningBoard of INEGI authorizesthecorrespondingregulation

  18. TechnicalStandards Standard Officialization/Publication in the Official Journal Governing Board Regulatory Revision and Validation Regulatory Affairs Direction General External revision SNIGMA Executive Committee/ Specialized Committees Standard proposal elaboration Technical Area (DGGMA) Standard revision Technical /Regulatory Areas (DGGMA) Internal revision INEGI Geographic Areas

  19. TechnicalStandards

  20. International Experiences

  21. RGNA Geodetic Data The Active NationalGeodetic Network (RGNA) is a set of 22 GPS stationscontinuouslyoperating and generatinggeodetic data in Mexico. The data are available at the INEGI website and usedbyGeodesyinternational agencies. The US NGS uses this data in the OPUS (Online Position UserService) processingservice. TheGeocentricReferenceSystemfortheAmericas (SIRGAS) has beenadopted as theofficialframeworkforseveral South American countries. Marco de Referencia Geodésico

  22. INEGI Processing Center INEGI is a SIRGAS OfficialProcessing Center forthe GPS stations data since 2010. Eachweek, coordinates and theirprecision are deliveredto SIRGAS and tothe regional subcomission of theRegional Reference Frames for North America (NAREF). Thisinformationcontributestothedetermination and maintenance of thegeodeticreferenceframe in North America, LatinAmerica and theCaribbean.

  23. Geoid GeoidHeightModel Giventhewidespread use of GPS forobtainingcoordinatestobeused in topographic and cadastreactivities, itisnecessarytohave a geoidmodelfortheexpression of heightvalues at mean sea level. INEGI ispart of theworkinggrouponGravity and North American Geoid, alongwithCanada and the USA, forthedetermination of aninternationalstandardgeoid, within a subcomission of the International Association of Geodesy.

  24. Geoid Anotherprojectisthe “Monitoring of TemporaryChangesontheGeoidforMexico, Central America and theCaribbean”, financedbythe Pan American Institute of Geography and History (PAIGH), INEGI, NationalGeodeticSurvey and theUniversity of New Brunswick. At present, thecountriesparticipating are: Guatemala, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Honduras, DominicanRepublic, Panama, USA, Canada and Mexico.

  25. The North American Atlas Hydrography and itsbasicinfrastructure are essentialelementsforrepresentingtheterritory, and foritsgeographicunderstanding. In a globalizedsituation, theMexicanrealityisbetterunderstoodcomprehensivelyiftheneighboringcountries are included.

  26. The North American Atlas • Theconstruction of a trinationalmapistheresult of theintegration of specifications and standardsthatdemonstratetheinteroperability of at leastthispart of theCartographicSystems of theparticipantcountries. • Thisproject has combinedtheinformation and experience of four agencies: • Natural ResourcesCanada • U.S. Geological Survey • INEGI • Commissionforthe North American EnvironmentalCooperation

  27. The North American Atlas Thismapwasprinted at 1:10,000,000 scale and can beconsulted in a web mapservice.

  28. Building of the Mexico-USA Transboundary Fundamental Data • An on-line mapsystem has beendevelopedfortheseamlesstransboundary fundamental data query; the data can bedownloadedfrom a web platform. http://borderhealth.cr.usgs.gov • Amongtheavailable data you can find: • Binationalintegration of land use • Highwayinfrastructure data • Toponyms • Potentialpollutionsources • Analysis of land use and pollutants • Modelsforinteractiverivernetworks • Waterquantity and quality data • Geological data • Census data

  29. Building of the Mexico-USA Transboundary Fundamental Data • USA – MexicoAerophotographicMosaic • The USA performedtheaerophotographicsurvey of the Rio Grande thatallowedthegeneration of theaerophotographicmosaic. • INEGI reproducedtheaerophotographicmosaic at 1:25,000 scale. • Each country chose • itsgeographic • features and its • geographicnames.

  30. Producing of theMexico-USA Transboundary Fundamental Data • ForjointMexico-USA jointwork in the Rio Grande region, it has beennecessarytocreateallianceswith agencies onbothsides of theborder, such as: • INEGI • UnitedStates Geological Service • BorderUniversityConsortiums - SCERP • International USA- MexicoBorder and WaterCommission • Pan American HealthInstitute • PEMEX (MexicanPetrolleumCo.) • Border 2012 -EPA and SEMAR • As a result of theMexico–USA collaboration, someproductshavebeengeneratedshowingstatisticalinformationonbothsides of theborder.

  31. Building of the Mexico-USA Transboundary Fundamental Data On-line MapSystemforSeamlessTransboundary Fundamental Data Queries

  32. Building of the Mexico-USA Transboundary Fundamental Data 2000 Census Data (INEGI and US Census Bureau) showingpopulationdensity per AGEB (Mex) and block group (US).

  33. Integration of Central AmericaGeospatial Data In ordertointegrate a geospatialinformation continuum of basic and thematic data at 1:250,000 scalefor Central America, a group of expertsfromseveralcountrieswasestablished. OrganizingInstitutions: Pan American Institute of Geography and History/ NationalUniversity of Costa Rica /UnitedStates Geological Survey

  34. Integration of Central AmericaGeospatial Data

  35. Considerations

  36. Considerations • Continuewiththeconstruction of a regulatoryframeworkforthestrengthening of theNationalSystem of Statistical and GeographicalInformation of Mexico • Usingcommonframes and methodologiesenablestoregulategeographicactivities and contributesto: • Promotethe use of commontechnicalspecificationsforthe • performance of activitiesunderhomogeneouscriteria • Promotethe use of a commonlanguage • Generateconsistentgeospatialinformation • Facilitatinginformationinterchangeamongcountries in theregion

  37. THANK YOU

More Related