1 / 65

Engaging Brains Through Games and Simulations

Engaging Brains Through Games and Simulations. Bernie Dodge, PhD San Diego State University. http://webquest.org/workshops/engaging/. Outline. Games vs Learning An Equation for Learning Power Star Logo 2 Second Life The Glass Bead eGame Choose Your Own Edventure Turoff’s Game

sai
Télécharger la présentation

Engaging Brains Through Games and Simulations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Engaging Brains Through Games and Simulations Bernie Dodge, PhD San Diego State University http://webquest.org/workshops/engaging/

  2. Outline • Games vs Learning • An Equation for Learning Power • Star Logo 2 • Second Life • The Glass Bead eGame • Choose Your Own Edventure • Turoff’s Game • Simulated Diaries

  3. Good Games vs Good Teaching • Engagement • Unforgetableness • Positive emotion • Uncertainty But also… • Adrenaline • Addiction • Mindless automatic behavior

  4. Game Addiction

  5. Mini-Games Marc Prensky distinguishes between mini-games and complex games. Mini-games… • Take less than one hour • Have simple content

  6. Mini-Game Examples • Card games (except Bridge) • Quiz / Trivia games • Board games (except Chess & Go)

  7. Complex Games • Require learning a wide variety of strategies and skills • Develop mastery by progressing through a series of levels • Include ethical dilemmas and choices • Take 10 to 100 hours to complete

  8. Example Complex Games • Rise of Nations • Civilization • The Sims • World of Warcraft • America’s Army • John Madden’s Football

  9. Two Burning Questions: • Who’s got 10-100 hours to spare in their course? • Who’s got a million dollars to develop a complex game wrapped around their course content?

  10. Brain Minutes

  11. Learning Power P = ADE Power = Attention x Depth x Efficiency

  12. Attention The proportion of time learners spend • looking at, • listening to, and • thinking about what you want them to. • Ranges from 0 to 1.

  13. Causes of Attention Human Interest Variability Attention Competition Uncertainty Challenge Social interaction

  14. Attention as a Ratio Attention = Brain Minutes spent attending to X Total Brain Minutes

  15. Depth • the degree to which thinking is required • ranges from 0 to 100

  16. Efficiency • Curricular efficiency is the proportion of time learners have to spend thinking about what you’re trying to teach. Efficiency = Brain Minutes Devoted to Curriculum Total Brain Minutes

  17. Efficiency and Games If a game is… • Unfamiliar • Particularly creative • Richly detailed Learners will.. • Spend brain minutes on figuring out the game • And not figuring out your content

  18. Learning Power P = ADE Power = Attention x Depth x Efficiency So a perfect game would be 1 x 100 x 1 = 100

  19. Star Logo TNG

  20. Star Logo TNG • Programming by building blocks

  21. Wash Your Hands, Homer

  22. Wash Your Hands, Homer

  23. Wash Your Hands, Homer

  24. Wash Your Hands, Homer

  25. Learning Power of Star Logo • High attention • High depth • Low efficiency • Power = .9 x 90 x .2 = 16

  26. Second Life

  27. Second Life

  28. Second Life

  29. Second Life

  30. Second Life

  31. Possibilities • Mathematics of scaling, geometry • Theater productions • Machinema • Cross cultural exchange • Role plays

  32. Learning Power of Second Life • Attention will be very high • Depth could range from low to high • Efficiency could be low to medium • Power = .9 x 90 x .5 = 40 at best • Power = .9 x 10 x .2 = 18 at worst

  33. Choose Your Own Adventure • Popular book series for children • Adapted for adult training • Branching stories, multiple endings

  34. Choose Your Own Edventure • Narrative/simulation based on your content • Emphasis on choices and their consequences • You create a starting point and two or more choices • Students carry the story on from there • Easily implemented in Google Docs

  35. Learning Power of CYOE • High attention • High depth • Medium efficiency • Power = .9 x 90 x .5 = 40

  36. The Glass Bead Game • Based on Hermann Hesse’s Magister Ludi. • A kind of Scrabble for ideas

  37. Glass Bead eGame • Can use Inspiration or Gliffy • Learners take turns placing a bead and explaining how it relates to adjacent beads • Players reward points based on the elegance or surpringness of the linkages

  38. Glass Bead eGame

  39. Learning Power of the GBG • High attention • High depth • High efficiency • Power = .9 x 90 x .9 = 73

  40. Turoff’s Game • Invented by Alan Turoff • Played on Compuserve in the early 80s • Useful to liven up an online chat • Development cost: $0

  41. Turoff’s Game • Two lines will be shown • Intertwingled between them is a word or phrase that matches the clue • Example: A U.S. President • GARPETCHACHINA • WOTRONGYERDUNG • GARPETCHACHINA • WOTRONGYERDUNG • WARRENGHARDING

More Related