1 / 13

Quality in Contracting

Quality in Contracting. Dr. Tariq A. Aldowaisan; CSP, CQA, CQE, CQM/OE Gulf Lead Consultants. Kuwait Electricity & Water Contractors Conference & Exhibition 26 & 27 May 2010. Agenda. Quality Definition in Contracting Supplier/Customer Dual Roles Proactive vs. Reactive Quality in Contracting

sai
Télécharger la présentation

Quality in Contracting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Quality in Contracting Dr. Tariq A. Aldowaisan; CSP, CQA, CQE, CQM/OE Gulf Lead Consultants Kuwait Electricity & Water Contractors Conference & Exhibition 26 & 27 May 2010

  2. Agenda • Quality Definition in Contracting • Supplier/Customer Dual Roles • Proactive vs. Reactive Quality in Contracting • Quality Cost Types in Contracting • Fishbone – Contract Success • Balanced PM in Contracting • SPO • BSC

  3. Quality Definition • Quality is Meeting Customer Expectations. • In Contracting: • Meeting owner expectations • Meeting contractor expectations • Meeting other stakeholders expectations

  4. Supplier-Customer Dual Roles Owner (MEW) Contractor • MEW Expectations: • Quality services and manpower. • Meeting specifications • Competent manpower • Projects completed on time. • Projects completed without – or with minimal – variation orders. • Reasonable prices. • Contractor Expectations: • Fair and quick handling of disputes and claims. • Flexible and inviting prequalification process (innocent till proven guilty!) • Timely information on future projects. • Timely payment of valid invoices. • Assistance to close quality and performance gaps; e.g. advise, training, seminars, & field visits Expectations

  5. Proactive Quality • Prequalification & short-listing • Criteria: Company Experience, Financial, HSE Credentials • Type I Error: rejecting when you should accept • Type II Error: accepting when you should reject • Challenge: how to encourage local, professional, new entrants • Tendering (Preparation & Award) • Well-defined objective and scope of work with clear deliverables • Selection of competent owner representative • Objective selection of winner

  6. Reactive Quality • Contract Administration • Monitor compliance with objective/scope • Monitor compliance with schedule • Monitor compliance with budget • Review quality of deliverables • Material • Services

  7. Quality Cost Types in Contracting Contractor’s Perspective Owner’s Perspective Preventive Choosing qualified resources Quality training Appraisal Follow-up through progress reports Review progress reports’ feedback Internal failure Fixing errors in progress reports’ feedback External failure Error in estimating/developing overall project budget • Preventive • Audits of the effectiveness of the quality system • Quality training • Appraisal • Quality audits • Setup for test or inspection • Internal failure • Material procurement costs • Rework labor and overhead • External failure • Cost of field servicing and handling complaints • Lost sales arising from a reputation for poor quality

  8. Conformance Level vs. Quality Costs

  9. Fishbone – Contract Failure

  10. Quality Indicators in Contracting • No. of prequalified contractors. • No. of bidders. • No. of disputes/claims. • Average time & SD to process claims • No. of variation orders. • Contractor performance scores, i.e. less delays, more quality, more safety. • Satisfaction scores among contractors. • Satisfaction scores among MEW front-liners.

  11. Balancing Measures - SPO • Structure/Process/Outcome Structure Process Outcome • Satisfaction scores among contractors • Satisfaction scores among MEW front-liners • Contractor performance scores, i.e. less delays, more quality, more safety. • Ratio of resources to tenders issued • Percentage of credentialed employees • Resources training intensity • No. of disputes/claims • Average time & SD to process claims • No. of prequalified contractors • No. of bidders • No. of variation orders • Contractor performance scores, i.e. less delays, more quality, more safety.

  12. Balancing Indicators - Balanced Score Card

  13. Thank you… Gulf Lead Consultants

More Related