1 / 38

Brian Kern Observational Astronomy 10/25/00

Adaptive Optics and Optical Interferometry or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Atmosphere. Brian Kern Observational Astronomy 10/25/00. Brief summary. Diffraction limit vs. atmospheric limit Science goals vs. spatial scale Adaptive Optics principles Interferometry principles

saki
Télécharger la présentation

Brian Kern Observational Astronomy 10/25/00

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Adaptive OpticsandOptical InterferometryorHow I Learned to Stop Worryingand Love the Atmosphere Brian Kern Observational Astronomy 10/25/00

  2. Brief summary • Diffraction limit vs. atmospheric limit • Science goals vs. spatial scale • Adaptive Optics principles • Interferometry principles • Recent results

  3. Diffraction limit • Limit to spatial resolution set by diameter of optics • Fundamental limit; you can’t simply zoom in • For 10-m telescope, in visible light (l = 0.5 mm), l/D = 0.010 arcsecl/D = 0.045 arcsec for l = 2.2 mm 1.2 l/D

  4. Atmospheric limit • Air has patches of different T, which gives different r, and therefore different indices of refration n. Tr n  diverging lens T r  n  converging lens

  5. Atmospheric limit - wavefront • Think of phase changes in wavefront - advancing and retarding wavefronts +0- Phase map

  6. Atmospheric limit - seeing disk • Atmosphere creates seeing disk, ~ 1 arcsec • Compare to 0.010 arcsec at l=0.5 mm, 0.045 arcsec at l=2.2 mm • Keck 10m telescope no better than 4” telescope • Features smaller than 1 arcsec lost in the blur • Seeing is site-dependent and time-dependent

  7. Atmospheric limit - motivation • Hubble Space Telescope unaffected by atmosphere • Diffraction-limited resolution, D=2.4 m • We can achieve 4x better resolution with a 10-m telescope

  8. Atmospheric limit - motivation

  9. Science goals

  10. Science goals

  11. Adaptive Optics - overview • Correct aberrated wavefront using deformable mirror • Mirror takes shape opposite to wavefront distortion • Must measure aberrations to know how to make correction • Can use natural guide star or laser guide star

  12. Adaptive Optics - requirements • Atmosphere sets spatial scale of correction • r0 is coherence length (Fried’s parameter) • r0 ~ 10 cm for 1 arcsec seeing in visible (0.5 mm) light • r0l6/5; r0 ~ 60 cm for l=2.2 mm (IR) • for l=20 mm (mid-IR), r0 > 8 m; no need for AO • r0 and wind speed v set time scale of correction • v ~ 10 m/s, so r0 /v = t ~ 10 ms • So we need ~ (D/r0)2 actuators, making corrections every t seconds • for l=0.5 mm, D =10 m, (D/r0)2 =104, t =10 ms • for l=2.2 mm, D =10 m, (D/r0)2 =250, t =60 ms

  13. Adaptive Optics - wavefront sensing • Guide star is necessary to determine corrections • Hartmann wavefront sensor is most common way to determine aberrations • Wavefront sensor looks at image of individual r0sub-apertures • Position of single sub-aperture image tells you slope of wavefront • Connect slopes to determine wavefront shape

  14. qiso h r0 Adaptive Optics - isoplanatism • To look at anything other than guide star, you look through a different line-of-sight • For a large off-axis angle, corrections are different for guide star and science object • Isoplanatic angle qiso is angle where corrections stop being valid • Angle qiso=h/r0 • For h=10 km, l=0.5 mm, qiso=2 arcsecl=2.2 mm, qiso=12 arcsec

  15. Adaptive Optics - natural guide stars • Corrections need to be measured for each r0-diameter patch in time t • For accurate corrections, need ~ 100 photons per sub-aperture per t • Magnitude limit is V ~ 9K ~ 14 • Need stars to be within qiso of science objects • Sky coverage 3×10-4 for l=0.5 mm0.01 for l=2.2 mm

  16. Adaptive Optics - laser guide stars • High atmosphere (90 km) has layer of sodium from meteors • Tune laser to sodium spectral line, laser makes artificial guide star 90 km up • Point it anywhere you want • Single wavelength doesn’t interfere with science observation • Still need tip/tilt from natural guide star, but can be farther away and much fainter (1 correction for whole telescope)

  17. Adaptive Optics - results

  18. Adaptive Optics - results

  19. Adaptive Optics - results NGC 7469

  20. Interferometry - Young’s double-slit • Young’s double-slit experiment d Path lengths equalphase difference 0ºconstructive interference Path lengths differ by l/2phase difference 180ºdestructive interference l/d Intensity 0

  21. Interferometry - Two objects • Two objects give same interference pattern, shifted by position of object + = (l/d)/2

  22. Interferometry - Michelson • Michelson put double-slit on top of Mount Wilson 100” • vary “baseline” d to find Dx=(l/d)/2, where fringes disappear d

  23. Interferometry - atmosphere • Atmosphere adds random phase errors to two slits

  24. Interferometry - visibility • Atmosphere affects two stars the same; combined interference pattern is shifted, but not changed • “modulation” is unaffected by atmosphere • Define visibility V = (Imax - Imin) / (Imax + Imin) • V ranges from 0 to 1 V=1 V=0.5 V=0

  25. Interferometry - detection • Atmospheric phase differences shift pattern around • Place detector at zero-point, let atmosphere shift pattern back and forth across detector • Time series of detected intensity gives visibility • Use “slit” sizes ~ r0, detector intensity changes every t • Stars must be within qiso of each other I Imax Imin t

  26. Interferometry - visibility maps • 2-dimensional map of baseline vectors is (u,v) plane • Map of visibilities in (u,v) plane is (u,v) map • Short baselines correspond to large angular separations, long baselines correspond to small angular separations

  27. Interferometry - bigger baselines • Apertures can be completely disconnected from each other • Extending baselines to hundreds of meters resolves features at l/d = 0.0003 arcsec for l=0.5 mm, d=350 m

  28. Interferometry - delay lines • When apertures are not carried by a single telescope, they need a path length compensation • The delay lines take up lots of space Path length difference Delay line

  29. Interferometry - phase information • Letting atmosphere shift modulation pattern around eliminates phase information • In order to get phase information, phase needs to be stabilized with respect to atmospheric distortions • Can use double-star feed, where phase is locked to a star, and a science target can be observed in full phase

  30. Interferometry - large apertures • In order to use aperture much larger than r0, its distortions have to be “flattened” • Need AO on all large apertures before they can be interfered

  31. Interferometry - space • No atmospheric distortions in space • Spacecraft control (vibrations, positions) must be controlled to ~ picometer precision

  32. Interferometry - facilities NAME # tel aperture baseline CHARA Center for High-Angular Resolution Astronomy 6 1.0 350COAST Cambridge Optical Aperture Synthesis Tel. 5 0.40 20GI2T Grand Intérferomètre à 2 Télescopes 2 1.5 65 IOTA Infrared Optical Telescope Array 2 0.40 38 ISI Infrared Spatial Interferometer 2 1.6 85 MIRA-I Mitaka Infrared Array 2 0.25 4 NPOI Navy Prototype Optical Interferometer 3 0.12 35 PTI Palomar Testbed Interferometer 3 0.40 110SUSI Sydney University Stellar Interferometer 2 0.14 640 Keck K1-K2 2 10.0 60 Keck Auxiliary array upgrade 4 1.8 140 LBT Large Binocular Telescope 2 8.4 23 VIMA VLT Interferometer Main Array 4 8.0 130 VISA VLT Interferometer Sub-Array 4 1.8 202

  33. Interferometry - results Capella Sep 28 1995 Sep 13 1995

More Related