1 / 11

Standards Panel: Reflections on 10+ Years of Standards Work

http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/meetings/sca-home-nation-tour-2008/. Standards Panel: Reflections on 10+ Years of Standards Work. About This Talk This talk gives a brief summary of Brian Kelly’s involvement in standards work since the mid 1990s and reflections on these experiences.

salena
Télécharger la présentation

Standards Panel: Reflections on 10+ Years of Standards Work

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/meetings/sca-home-nation-tour-2008/http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/meetings/sca-home-nation-tour-2008/ Standards Panel: Reflections on 10+ Years of Standards Work About This Talk This talk gives a brief summary of Brian Kelly’s involvement in standards work since the mid 1990s and reflections on these experiences. Brian Kelly UKOLN University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY Email B.Kelly@ukoln.ac.uk Resources bookmarked using ‘sca-home-nation-tour-2008' tag UKOLN is supported by: This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 licence (but note caveat)

  2. About Me and About UKOLN • Brian Kelly: • UK Web Focus: a Web advisory post based at UKOLN • Funded by JISC and MLA to advise HE/FE and cultural heritage sectors • Web developer since Jan 1993 • Involved with JISC Standards work since 1995 • UKOLN: • National centre of expertise in digital information management • Located at the University of Bath

  3. The eLib Years • eLib Programme • Large-scale JISC-funded programme • Ran from 1996-2000? • Standards for eLib projects documented: • V 1.0 published in Feb 1995 / V 2.0 in Oct 1998 • See <http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/elib/papers/other/standards/> • Document refers to: • CGM • SGML • IAFA/whois++ • Z39.50 • URLs and URNs • VRML • … “eLib projects are expected to provide a URL for public services, and a URN when these become stable“

  4. NOF-Digi Experiences • NOF-Digi: • Lottery money to digitise and provide access to cultural resources • Technical Advisory Service provided by UKOLN & AHDS • Standards document: • Based on eLib/DNER Standards document • No longer available on People’s Network Site  • Experiences: • Valuable learning experience for cultural heritage orgs • Standards sometimes too theoretical so ‘escape clause’ (migration strategy) developed – documented reasons for non-conformance & plans for migration to open standards needed in project reports

  5. Developing A QA Framework • QA Focus: • JISC-funded project • Provided by UKOLN and TASI/AHDS • Aim: • Develop QA framework for JISC development projects • Provide recommendations on compliance regime for standards i.e. what does must mean? • Findings: • Uncertainty as to what is meant by an ‘open standard’ • Diversity of deliverables, approaches, expertise, effort, …

  6. Issues • What is an open standard? • RSS (1.0/2.0) • PDF • MS Word • What are the alternatives to open standards? • Do nothing? • Use something that’s not (yet) an open standard but isn’t owned by a company (‘my standard’) • Invent an open standard • Something else? • What about adopting popular patterns of use: • Web Services standards vs REST architectural approach (nb criticisms of WS* complexities & popularity of latter in Amazon)

  7. Characteristics Of Open Standards • EMII-DCF characteristics of open standard: • Open access (to the standard itself and to documents produced during its development) • Open use (implementing the standard incurs no or little cost for IPR, through licensing, for example) • Ongoing support driven by requirements of the user not the interests of the standard provider • EU definition: • The standard is adopted and will be maintained by a not-for-profit organization • The standard specification document is available either freely or at a nominal charge • The intellectual property of the standard is made irrevocably available on a royalty free basis • No constraints on the re-use of the standard

  8. What Do We Really Want? • Do we want: • Open standards? • The benefits promised by open standards: application- and device- independence, freedom from vendor pressures, …? • Do we want: • The cost savings promised by vendor-independent standards? • The costs associated with deploying new standards? • How do we reconcile: • A user-centred approach to IT development? • A developer-led approach to IT development?

  9. Changing Environment • Experiences from mid-1990s: • Identification of relevant standards • Engagement of standards-development • Consensus building; reflecting wide range of stake-holders • … • Recent experiences: • Web 2.0 • Using existing, well-established standards • Commercial provision of (often popular) services

  10. Quality Assurance External factors: institutional, cultural, legal, … Context: Policies Prog. n Funding Research Sector … Annotated Standards Catalogue Purpose Governance … Maturity Risks Responding To Change • Contextual model developed for JISC by UKOLN’s QA Focus project Context: Compliance External Self assessment Learning Penalties

  11. Questions • Issues which need to be addressed: • Does the evidence demonstrate the success of current approaches to use of standards? • Have we learnt from mistakes of the past (cf Coloured Book software)? • Does the contextual model provide the flexibility needed? • Is this an approach which can be used across a range of sectors?

More Related