1 / 15

William Stallings Data and Computer Communications 7 th Edition

William Stallings Data and Computer Communications 7 th Edition. Chapter 12 Routing. Performance Criteri a. U sed for path selection Minimum hop count M inim um cost. Packet Switched Network example. Least Cost Algoritm. Routing decision Num ber of hop s

sallyprice
Télécharger la présentation

William Stallings Data and Computer Communications 7 th Edition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. William StallingsData and Computer Communications7th Edition Chapter 12 Routing

  2. Performance Criteria • Used for path selection • Minimum hop count • Minimum cost

  3. Packet Switched Network example

  4. Least Cost Algoritm • Routing decision • Numberof hops • link cost reflects capacity • Network with bidirectional links • Each link has a cost associated in both directions • Path cost equal to sum of link costs • Least cost path searched for each pair of nodes • Costs can be different on diff. directions

  5. Dijkstra Algorithm Definitions • Searches the least cost path from a source node to all other nodes by examining paths of increasing length or number of hops • N = set of nodes of the network • s = source node • T = setul of nodes incorporated in the algorithm • w(i, j) = cost of link from node i to node j • w(i, i) = 0 • w(i, j) = if not directly connected • w(i, j)  0 ifdirectly connected • L(n) = least cost path from node s to n known • At finish, L(n) is the least cost from s to all n

  6. Dijkstra Algorithm Method • Step 1 [Initialization] • T = {s} Source Node • L(n) = w(s, n) for n ≠ s • Initialyonly link costs • Step 2 [Next Node] • Searches neighbour nodenot incorporated in T with minimum cost to s • Incorporate nod in T • Step 3 [Update least cost path] • L(n) = min[L(n), L(x) + w(x, n)] for all n Ï T • If second term is min. update path by concatenation • [Finish ] Algorithm ends when all nodes incorporated in T

  7. Algoritm Dijkstra Observations • At finish, value L(x) asociated to each node x is the cost (lenght) of least cost path from s to x. • T definesthe least cost path from s to every other node • One iterationofsteps 2 and 3 adds a new nodeto T

  8. Example Algorithm Dijkstra

  9. Results for Dijkstra Algorithm

  10. Algoritm Bellman-Ford Definitions • Find shortest paths from source node such that paths contain at most one link • Find shortest paths such that paths have at most two links • And so on • s = source node • w(i, j) = link cost from node i to node j • w(i, i) = 0 • w(i, j) =  if nodes are directly connected • w(i, j)  0 if nodes directly connected • h = maximum number of links in path at current stage • Lh(n) =cost of least-cost path from s to n such that no more than h links

  11. Algorithm Bellman-Ford [Initialization] step 1 L0(n) = , for all n  s Lh(s) = 0, for all h [Update] step 2 For each successive h  0: For each n ≠ s, compute Lh+1(n)=minj[Lh(j)+w(j,n)] Connect n with predecessor node j that achieves minimum Eliminate any connection of n with different predecessor node formed during an earlier iteration Path from s to n terminates with link from j to n

  12. Observaţii Algoritm Bellman-Ford • At each iteration of step 2 for h=K and each destination node n, the algorithm compares paths from source s to n of length K+1 with the path from previous iteration • The path with lesser cost is maintained as best cost path

  13. Bellman-Ford Ex.

  14. Bellman-Ford Results

  15. B.-F. vs. Dijkstra • Dijkstra • Each node must know link costs of all links • Information must be exchanged with all other nodes • Both converge under static conditions to same solution • If costs change algorithm will attempt to catch up • If cost depends on traffic • Depends on routes chosen • then feedback condition exists • Bellman-Ford • Link cost to all neighboring nodes to node n [i.e., w(j, n)] plus total path cost to those neighboring nodes from a particular source node s [i.e., Lh(j)] • Each node can maintain set of costs and associated paths for every other node and exchange information with direct neighbors • Each node can use Bellman-Ford based only on information from neighbors and knowledge of its link costs • Instabilities may result

More Related